• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

频繁使用基层医疗保健和急诊部门人群的心理困扰:范围综述。

Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

École de réadaptation, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Public Health. 2019 Jul;172:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.024
PMID:31129474
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Frequent users of healthcare services are a small proportion of patients with disproportionately high healthcare usage. A wide array of factors, including psychological distress, leads to frequent use of healthcare services. There is no existing synthesis of research on frequent use and psychological distress in the general population. This scoping review aimed to compare psychological distress between frequent and non-frequent users and to examine the association between psychological distress and frequent use of healthcare services in primary care and emergency department (ED) services.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed following the five steps defined by Arksey and O'Malley. A search strategy was developed with an information specialist in five databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PubMed) for articles in English published between 1963 and October 2018. To be included, studies had to be quantitative, have taken place in a primary care or ED setting, have documented frequent use, and have measured psychological distress in patients. Two team members independently gathered the data for each of the included studies. Results were collated, summarized, and reported using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Psychological distress in primary care is generally higher in frequent users, and increased psychological distress scores are associated with frequent use. Both studies set in EDs reported noteworthy findings, stating that frequent users reported higher levels of psychological distress and that psychological distress was associated with frequent use.

CONCLUSION

Psychological distress is prevalent in frequent users and has a significant association with frequent use. As such, psychological distress should be evaluated by physicians to prevent or reduce frequent use and to identify candidates for interventions.

摘要

简介

高频次使用医疗服务的患者在患者群体中占比较小,但他们的医疗服务使用量却很高。大量的因素,包括心理困扰,导致了高频次使用医疗服务的情况。目前,尚未有针对普通人群中高频次使用医疗服务和心理困扰的综合研究。本范围界定综述旨在比较高频次使用者和非高频次使用者之间的心理困扰,并研究初级保健和急诊部门(ED)服务中,心理困扰与高频次使用医疗服务之间的关系。

方法

我们按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley 定义的五个步骤进行了范围界定综述。我们与一名信息专家合作制定了一个搜索策略,在五个数据库(Medline、PsycINFO、CINAHL、SCOPUS 和 PubMed)中搜索了 1963 年至 2018 年 10 月期间发表的英文文章。纳入标准为:定量研究、发生在初级保健或 ED 环境中、记录高频次使用、在患者中测量心理困扰的研究。两名团队成员独立收集了每一项纳入研究的数据。结果使用叙述性综合进行了整理、总结和报告。

结果

有 7 项研究符合纳入标准。初级保健中的高频次使用者的心理困扰通常更高,并且心理困扰评分的增加与高频次使用相关。两个在 ED 中进行的研究报告了值得注意的发现,即高频次使用者报告了更高水平的心理困扰,并且心理困扰与高频次使用相关。

结论

心理困扰在高频次使用者中很普遍,并且与高频次使用有显著关联。因此,医生应该评估心理困扰,以预防或减少高频次使用,并识别干预的候选人。

相似文献

1
Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review.频繁使用基层医疗保健和急诊部门人群的心理困扰:范围综述。
Public Health. 2019 Jul;172:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
Experience of being a frequent user of primary care and emergency department services: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.经常使用初级保健和急诊服务的体验:定性系统评价和主题综合。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e033351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033351.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Factors associated with frequent use of emergency-department services in a geriatric population: a systematic review.与老年人群体频繁使用急诊服务相关的因素:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1197-9.
5
Chronic pain and frequent use of emergency department: A systematic review.慢性疼痛与频繁使用急诊部:系统综述。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;38(2):358-363. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158492. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review.用于急诊科高频就诊者分析的统计工具:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e027750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027750.
7
The impact of knowledge on attitudes of emergency department staff towards patients with substance related presentations: a quantitative systematic review protocol.知识对急诊科工作人员对待物质相关就诊患者态度的影响:一项定量系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):133-45. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2203.
8
Non-emergency department (ED) interventions to reduce ED utilization: a scoping review.非急诊部门(ED)干预措施以减少 ED 利用:范围综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01028-4.
9
Predictors and outcomes of frequent emergency department users.急诊科频繁使用者的预测因素及结局
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):320-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01344.x.
10
Individual predictors of frequent emergency department use: a scoping review.频繁使用急诊科的个体预测因素:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 20;16(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1852-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a national Distress Brief Intervention: a multi-agency service to provide connected, compassionate support for people in distress.全国性应激简短干预措施的制定:一项多机构服务,为处于困境中的人们提供连贯、富有同情心的支持。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12469-3.
2
Psychological Nursing Effect of Patients with Gynecological Malignant Tumor.妇科恶性肿瘤患者的心理护理效果。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 May 23;2022:1569656. doi: 10.1155/2022/1569656. eCollection 2022.
3
Stress Measurement in Primary Care: Conceptual Issues, Barriers, Resources, and Recommendations for Study.
初级保健中的压力测量:概念问题、障碍、资源以及研究建议。
Psychosom Med. 2022 Apr 1;84(3):267-275. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001051.
4
Does living close to a petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of the COVID-19 lockdown?居住在石化综合体附近是否会增加 COVID-19 封锁对心理健康的负面影响?
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 17;16(3):e0249058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249058. eCollection 2021.
5
CONECT-6: a case-finding tool to identify patients with complex health needs.CONECT-6:一种用于识别有复杂健康需求患者的病例发现工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06154-4.
6
Frequent users of emergency departments and patient flow in Alberta and Ontario, Canada: an administrative data study.加拿大艾伯塔省和安大略省急诊频繁就诊者和患者流量:一项行政数据研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):938. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05774-6.