Suppr超能文献

评估髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白脑炎在临床常规队列中的诊断标准和预警信号。

Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and red flags of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein encephalomyelitis in a clinical routine cohort.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021 Apr;27(4):426-438. doi: 10.1111/cns.13461. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Abstract

AIMS

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG) have been proposed to define "MOG encephalomyelitis" (MOG-EM), with published diagnostic and "red flag" criteria. We aimed to evaluate these criteria in a routine clinical setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with borderline/positive MOG-IgG and applied the diagnostic and red flag criteria to determine likelihood of MOG-EM diagnosis. Para-/clinical parameters were described and analyzed with chi-square test.

RESULTS

In total, 37 patients fulfilled MOG-EM diagnostic criteria (female-to-male ratio: 1.6:1, median onset age: 28.0 years [IQR 18.5-40.5], n = 8 with pediatric onset). In 24/37, red flags were present, predominantly MOG-IgG at assay cutoff and/or MRI lesions suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS). As proposed in the consensus criteria, these patients should rather be described as "possible" MOG-EM. Of these, we classified 13 patients as "unlikely" MOG-EM in the presence of the red flag "borderline MOG-IgG" with negative MOG-IgG retest or coincidence of ≥1 additional red flag. This group mainly consisted of patients diagnosed with MS (n = 11). Frequency of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF-)-specific oligoclonal bands (OCB) is significantly lower in definite vs possible and unlikely MOG-EM (P = .0005).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of diagnostic and red flag criteria, MOG-IgG retesting (incl. change of assay), and CSF-specific OCB are relevant in clinical routine cohorts to differentiate MOG-EM from MS.

摘要

目的

髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白抗体(MOG-IgG)被提议用于定义“MOG 脑炎”(MOG-EM),并制定了相关诊断和“警示”标准。本研究旨在常规临床环境中评估这些标准。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 MOG-IgG 边界阳性患者,并应用诊断和警示标准来确定 MOG-EM 的诊断可能性。采用卡方检验描述和分析了临床和实验室参数。

结果

共有 37 例患者符合 MOG-EM 诊断标准(女/男比为 1.6:1,中位发病年龄为 28.0 岁[IQR 18.5-40.5],8 例为儿童起病)。在 24/37 例患者中,存在警示标准,主要是 MOG-IgG 在检测截止值以上和/或 MRI 病灶提示多发性硬化(MS)。根据共识标准,这些患者应被描述为“可能”MOG-EM。其中,在存在“边界 MOG-IgG”和 MOG-IgG 复测阴性或≥1 个其他警示标准的情况下,我们将 13 例患者归类为“不太可能”MOG-EM。该组主要由诊断为 MS 的患者(n=11)组成。与确定的和可能的以及不太可能的 MOG-EM 相比,脑脊液(CSF)-特异性寡克隆带(OCB)的频率显著更低(P=0.0005)。

结论

在临床常规队列中,评估诊断和警示标准、MOG-IgG 复测(包括检测方法的改变)和 CSF 特异性 OCB,对于将 MOG-EM 与 MS 区分开来具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb73/7941167/db023e60dcf0/CNS-27-426-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验