Child Neurology Section, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States.
Neuropediatrics. 2020 Dec;51(6):377-388. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716901. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
Over the last several decades, significant progress has been made in the discovery of appropriate therapy in the management of infantile spasms (IS). Based on several well-controlled studies, the American Academy of Neurology and the Child Neurology Society have published the current best practice parameters for the treatment of IS. However, dissemination and implementation of evidence-based guidelines remain a significant challenge. Though the number of well-performed controlled trials and systematic reviews is increasing exponentially, the proportion of valuable new information subsequently embedding into the routine clinical care is significantly lower. Planned and systematic implementation of evidence-based interventions in a given health care structure may outstrip the benefits of discovering a new insight, procedure, or drug in another controlled setting. Implementation problems can be broad-ranging to hinder effective, efficient, safe, timely, and patient-centered care without significant variation. The first part of this review article provides a detailed summary of some crucial comparative treatment studies of IS available in the literature. In the second part, practical challenges to mitigate the gap between knowledge and practice to improve outcomes in the management of IS has been explored, and a consolidated framework approach for systematic implementation research methodology has been discussed to implement evidence-based guidelines for the management of IS. Although large multicenter controlled studies will help gather quality evidence in the treatment of IS, a more comprehensive range of scientific methodologies, including qualitative research and mixed research methodologies, will hold the more considerable promise for implementing evidence-based practices in the health care system.
在过去几十年中,在婴儿痉挛症 (IS) 的治疗管理中发现合适的治疗方法方面取得了重大进展。基于几项精心控制的研究,美国神经病学学会和儿童神经病学学会发布了目前治疗 IS 的最佳实践参数。然而,传播和实施循证指南仍然是一个重大挑战。尽管进行了大量精心设计的对照试验和系统评价,随后纳入常规临床护理的有价值的新信息的比例仍然明显较低。在特定的医疗保健结构中计划和系统地实施循证干预措施可能会超过在另一个对照环境中发现新见解、程序或药物的好处。实施问题可能范围广泛,从而阻碍了有效、高效、安全、及时和以患者为中心的护理,而不会有明显的变化。本文的第一部分详细总结了文献中一些关于 IS 的关键比较治疗研究。在第二部分,探讨了减轻知识与实践之间差距以改善 IS 管理结果的实际挑战,并讨论了综合框架方法来实施循证指南管理 IS。虽然大型多中心对照研究将有助于在 IS 的治疗中收集高质量的证据,但更广泛的科学方法,包括定性研究和混合研究方法,将为在医疗保健系统中实施循证实践提供更大的希望。