Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激在卒中后门诊康复环境中的可行性与安全性

Feasibility and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting After Stroke.

作者信息

Cleland Brice T, Galick Melissa, Huckstep Amy, Lenhart Laura, Madhavan Sangeetha

机构信息

Brain Plasticity Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab DayRehab Center, Homewood, IL 60430, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 9;10(10):719. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100719.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has strong potential for outpatient clinical use, but feasibility and safety of tDCS has only been evaluated in laboratory and inpatient clinical settings. The objective of this study was to assess feasibility and safety of tDCS for stroke in an outpatient clinical setting. Individuals with stroke in outpatient therapy received tDCS during physical therapy sessions. Feasibility was assessed with screening, enrollment, withdrawal, and adherence numbers, tDCS impressions, and perceived benefits and detriments of tDCS. Acute changes in fatigue and self-reported function and pre-post changes in fatigue were also assessed. Safety was assessed as adverse events and side effects. In total, 85 individuals were screened, and 10 were enrolled. Most exclusions were unrelated to clinical feasibility. In total, 3 participants withdrew, so 7 participants completed 2 sessions/week for 5-6 weeks with 100% adherence. In total, 71% reported positive impressions of tDCS. tDCS setup decreased to 5-7 min at end of study. There was one adverse event unrelated to tDCS. Mild to moderate side effects (tingling, itching, pinching, and fatigue) were experienced. In total, 86% of participants recounted benefits of tDCS. There were acute improvements in function and energy. Results support the feasibility and safety of tDCS in an outpatient clinical setting.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在门诊临床应用方面具有巨大潜力,但tDCS的可行性和安全性仅在实验室和住院临床环境中进行过评估。本研究的目的是评估tDCS在门诊临床环境中治疗中风的可行性和安全性。门诊治疗的中风患者在物理治疗期间接受tDCS。通过筛选、入组、退出和依从人数、tDCS印象以及tDCS的感知益处和弊端来评估可行性。还评估了疲劳的急性变化、自我报告的功能以及疲劳的前后变化。通过不良事件和副作用来评估安全性。总共筛选了85名个体,10名被纳入。大多数排除与临床可行性无关。总共有3名参与者退出,因此7名参与者以100%的依从性完成了每周2次、持续5 - 6周的治疗。总共71%的人对tDCS给出了积极评价。在研究结束时,tDCS的设置时间减少到了5 - 7分钟。有1例不良事件与tDCS无关。参与者出现了轻度至中度的副作用(刺痛、瘙痒、挤压感和疲劳)。总共86%的参与者讲述了tDCS的益处。功能和精力有急性改善。结果支持tDCS在门诊临床环境中的可行性和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8297/7599981/4973f98f857e/brainsci-10-00719-g001.jpg

相似文献

9
Safety Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke.
Neuromodulation. 2017 Apr;20(3):215-222. doi: 10.1111/ner.12574. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
10
Tolerability and blinding of 4x1 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) at two and three milliamps.
Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):991-997. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 May 4.

引用本文的文献

4
Study protocol of a double-blind randomized control trial of transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke fatigue.
Front Neurol. 2024 Jan 29;14:1297429. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1297429. eCollection 2023.
6
Barriers to Enrollment in Post-Stroke Brain Stimulation in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Sep;36(9):596-602. doi: 10.1177/15459683221088861. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Cortical priming strategies for gait training after stroke: a controlled, stratified trial.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 17;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00744-9.
4
9
Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
The treatment of fatigue by non-invasive brain stimulation.
Neurophysiol Clin. 2017 Apr;47(2):173-184. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验