• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Barriers to Enrollment in Post-Stroke Brain Stimulation in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population.在不同种族和民族的人群中,脑刺激治疗卒中后障碍。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Sep;36(9):596-602. doi: 10.1177/15459683221088861. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
Transcranial electrostimulation with special waveforms enhances upper-limb motor function in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.经颅电刺激特殊波形增强慢性脑卒中患者上肢运动功能:一项先导随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jun 30;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00901-8.
3
The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper-limb function post-stroke: A meta-analysis of multiple-session studies.经颅直流电刺激对脑卒中后上肢功能的影响:多次治疗研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Aug;132(8):1897-1918. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.05.015. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Motor Recovery Studies Exhibit a Dose-Response Relationship.经颅直流电刺激治疗中风后上肢运动功能恢复的研究呈现出剂量反应关系。
Brain Stimul. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
5
Effects of combining two techniques of non-invasive brain stimulation in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study.联合应用两种无创性脑刺激技术治疗亚急性期脑卒中患者的效果:一项初步研究。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02607-3.
6
Timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with mirror therapy on daily function and motor control in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.经颅直流电刺激联合镜像疗法对慢性脑卒中患者日常功能和运动控制的时间依赖性影响:一项随机对照初步研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Jul 20;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00722-1.
7
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Potentiates Improvements in Functional Ability in Patients With Chronic Stroke Receiving Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy.经颅直流电刺激增强了接受强制性运动疗法的慢性中风患者的功能能力改善。
Stroke. 2017 Jan;48(1):229-232. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014988. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
8
Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis.经颅直流电刺激与卒中上肢康复的多疗程治疗:一项综述与荟萃分析
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):946-955. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.067. Epub 2015 May 4.
9
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation combined to a resistance training program in chronic stroke survivors: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.双侧经颅直流电刺激联合抗阻训练对慢性脑卒中幸存者的疗效、安全性和耐受性:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的初步研究。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019;37(4):333-346. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190908.
10
Timing-dependent interaction effects of tDCS with mirror therapy on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合镜像疗法对慢性卒中患者上肢运动功能恢复的时间依赖性交互作用:一项随机对照试验研究
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Oct 15;405:116436. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116436. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Recovery: A Scoping Review.远程监督经颅直流电刺激在中风后恢复中的应用:一项范围综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 29;61(4):627. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040627.
2
Barriers to Enrollment in a Post-Stroke Neuromodulation and Walking Study: Implications for Recruiting Women.卒中后神经调节与行走研究入组障碍:对女性招募的影响。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024 Mar;38(3):207-213. doi: 10.1177/15459683241230028. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?经颅直流电刺激治疗慢性卒中:神经影像学是实现下一步重大进展的答案吗?
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 30;12(7):2601. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072601.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Are Stroke Rehabilitation Trial Recruitment Rates in Single Digits?为何中风康复试验的招募率仅为个位数?
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 8;12:674237. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.674237. eCollection 2021.
2
Contribution of TMS and TMS-EEG to the Understanding of Mechanisms Underlying Physiological Brain Aging.经颅磁刺激(TMS)和TMS-脑电图(TMS-EEG)对理解生理性脑老化潜在机制的贡献。
Brain Sci. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):405. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11030405.
3
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)改善中风后患者的日常生活活动、身体和认知功能。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 11;11(11):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub4.
4
Low frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in subacute ischemic stroke: Number of sessions that altered cortical excitability.低频经颅磁刺激治疗亚急性缺血性脑卒中:改变皮质兴奋性的治疗次数。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;47(4):427-434. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203156.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting After Stroke.经颅直流电刺激在卒中后门诊康复环境中的可行性与安全性
Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 9;10(10):719. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100719.
6
Timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with mirror therapy on daily function and motor control in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.经颅直流电刺激联合镜像疗法对慢性脑卒中患者日常功能和运动控制的时间依赖性影响:一项随机对照初步研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Jul 20;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00722-1.
7
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with virtual reality on upper limb function in patients with ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.虚拟现实经颅直流电刺激对缺血性脑卒中患者上肢功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Jun 15;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00699-x.
8
Neurophysiological signatures of hand motor response to dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke: a TMS and MEG study.亚急性期脑卒中双经颅直流电刺激诱发手部运动反应的神经生理学特征:一项 TMS 和 MEG 研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Jun 11;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00706-1.
9
Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation.脑卒中康复的进展与挑战。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Apr;19(4):348-360. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
10
Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with physical-therapy in acute stroke patients - A randomized, triple blind, sham-controlled study.经颅直流电刺激联合物理治疗急性脑卒中患者的随机、三盲、假刺激对照研究。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Mar-Apr;13(2):329-336. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

在不同种族和民族的人群中,脑刺激治疗卒中后障碍。

Barriers to Enrollment in Post-Stroke Brain Stimulation in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, 12334University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Department of Neurology, 23534Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Sep;36(9):596-602. doi: 10.1177/15459683221088861. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1177/15459683221088861
PMID:35925037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9509403/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Brain stimulation is an adjuvant strategy to promote rehabilitation after stroke. Here, we evaluated the influence of inclusion/exclusion criteria on enrollment in a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) trial in the context of a racially/ethnically diverse acute stroke service at University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW).

METHODS

3124 (59.7 ± 14.5 years) racially/ethnically diverse (38.4% non-Hispanic white, (W), Hispanic (H) 22%, African American (AA) 33.5%, Asian (A) 2.3%) patients were screened in the acute stroke service at UTSW. Demographics, stroke characteristics, and reasons for exclusion were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

2327 (74.5%) patients had a verified stroke. Only 44 of them (1.9%) were eligible. Causes for exclusion included in order of importance: (1) magnitude of upper extremity (UE) motor impairment, (2) prior strokes (s), (3) hemorrhagic stroke, (4) psychiatric condition or inability to follow instructions, and (5) old age, of these (2) and (4) were more common in AA patients but not in other minorities. 31 of the 44 eligible individuals were enrolled (W 1.68%, H 1.37%, AA .77%, A 3.774%). 90.5% of verified stroke patients did not exhibit contraindications for stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

3 main conclusions emerged: (a) The main limitations for inclusion in brain stimulation trials of motor recovery were magnitude of UE motor impairments and stroke lesion characteristics, (b) most stroke patients could be stimulated with tDCS without safety concerns and (c) carefully tailored inclusion criteria could increase diversity in enrollment.Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01007136.

摘要

背景与目的

脑刺激是促进中风后康复的辅助策略。在这里,我们评估了纳入/排除标准在德克萨斯大学西南分校(UTSW)的一个种族/民族多样化的急性中风服务中对经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)试验入组的影响。

方法

3124 名(59.7±14.5 岁)种族/民族多样化(38.4%非西班牙裔白人(W),22%西班牙裔(H),33.5%非裔美国人(AA),2.3%亚洲人(A))的患者在 UTSW 的急性中风服务中接受了筛选。前瞻性记录了人口统计学、中风特征和排除原因。

结果

2327 名(74.5%)患者经证实患有中风。只有 44 名(1.9%)符合条件。排除的原因按重要性顺序排列如下:(1)上肢(UE)运动障碍的程度,(2)既往中风(s),(3)出血性中风,(4)精神疾病或无法听从指示,(5)年龄较大,其中(2)和(4)在 AA 患者中更为常见,但在其他少数族裔中则不然。44 名符合条件的患者中有 31 名(W 1.68%,H 1.37%,AA.77%,A 3.774%)被纳入。90.5%的经证实的中风患者没有刺激的禁忌症。

结论

有 3 个主要结论:(a)运动恢复脑刺激试验纳入的主要限制是 UE 运动障碍的程度和中风病变特征,(b)大多数中风患者可以用 tDCS 进行刺激而没有安全问题,(c)精心定制的纳入标准可以增加入组的多样性。临床试验注册网址:http://clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01007136。