Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Dec;25(4):310-323. doi: 10.1177/1089253220949434. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
We examined how intercostal nerve block (ICNB) with standard bupivacaine and ICNB with extended-release liposomal bupivacaine, compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), were associated with postoperative opioid pain medication consumption and hospital length of stay (LOS) after thoracic surgery.
We studied 1935 patients who underwent thoracic surgery between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2017, at a tertiary academic center. Primary and secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery, the LOS, and total MME consumption from surgery to discharge.
Of these patients, 888 (45.9%) received TEA, 730 (37.7%) ICNB with standard bupivacaine, 127 (6.6%) ICNB with liposomal bupivacaine, and 190 (9.8%) no regional analgesia. Compared with epidural analgesia, in 2017, ICNB liposomal bupivacaine provided similar pain control in terms of MME consumption at 24 and 72 hours, but decreased MME consumption at 48 hours (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; confidence interval [CI] = 0.14-0.81) and at discharge (OR = 0.28; CI = 0.12-0.68) and was associated with a higher likelihood for a shorter LOS (hazard ratio = 3.46; CI = 2.42-4.96). Compared with TEA, ICNB with standard bupivacaine and no regional analgesia use showed varying impact on MME consumption between 24 and 72 hours after surgery, and their use was not associated with a significantly reduced MME consumption at discharge but with a shorter hospital LOS.
Multimodal analgesia involving regional anesthetic alternatives to TEA could help manage postoperative pain in thoracic surgery patients.
我们研究了肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)联合布比卡因标准制剂与 ICNB 联合布比卡因长时释控制剂,与胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)相比,在术后阿片类药物疼痛管理和胸外科术后住院时间(LOS)方面的相关性。
我们研究了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 11 月 30 日在一家三级学术中心接受胸外科手术的 1935 例患者。主要和次要结局是术后 24、48 和 72 小时内的阿片类药物消耗量(以吗啡毫克当量[MME]表示)、LOS 和从手术到出院的总 MME 消耗量。
这些患者中,888 例(45.9%)接受了 TEA,730 例(37.7%)接受了 ICNB 联合布比卡因标准制剂,127 例(6.6%)接受了 ICNB 联合布比卡因长时释控制剂,190 例(9.8%)未接受区域镇痛。与硬膜外镇痛相比,2017 年时,ICNB 长时释控布比卡因在 24 和 72 小时的 MME 消耗方面提供了相似的疼痛控制,但在 48 小时(比值比[OR] = 0.33;置信区间[CI] = 0.14-0.81)和出院时(OR = 0.28;CI = 0.12-0.68)的 MME 消耗减少,并且与 LOS 缩短的可能性更高(风险比[HR] = 3.46;CI = 2.42-4.96)相关。与 TEA 相比,ICNB 联合布比卡因标准制剂和不使用区域镇痛在术后 24 至 72 小时之间对 MME 消耗的影响各不相同,它们的使用与出院时 MME 消耗减少不显著相关,但与 LOS 缩短相关。
包括 TEA 以外的区域麻醉替代方案的多模式镇痛可能有助于管理胸外科患者的术后疼痛。