Department of Nephrology, Dongzhimen Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University and Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, China.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):1576-1586. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05190420. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
Several clinical practice guidelines noted the potential benefits of urate-lowering therapy on cardiovascular disease and CKD progression; however, the effect of this regimen remains uncertain. In this systematic review, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of urate-lowering therapy on major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, kidney failure events, BP, and GFR.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane databases for trials published through July 2020. We included prospective, randomized, controlled trials assessing the effects of urate-lowering therapy for at least 6 months on cardiovascular or kidney outcomes. Relevant information was extracted into a spreadsheet by two authors independently. Treatment effects were summarized using random effects meta-analysis.
We identified 28 trials including a total of 6458 participants with 506 major adverse cardiovascular events and 266 kidney failure events. Overall urate-lowering therapy did not show benefits on major adverse cardiovascular events (risk ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.18) and all-cause mortality (risk ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.39) or kidney failure (risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 1.54). Nevertheless, urate-lowering therapy attenuated the decline in the slope of GFR (weighted mean difference, 1.18 ml/min per 1.73 m per year; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 1.91) and lowered the mean BP (systolic BP: weighted mean difference, -3.45 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -6.10 to -0.80; diastolic BP: weighted mean difference, -2.02 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -3.25 to -0.78). There was no significant difference (risk ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.08) in the risk of adverse events between the participants receiving urate-lowering therapy and the control group.
Urate-lowering therapy did not produce benefits on the clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and kidney failure. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to support urate lowering in patients to improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes.
几项临床实践指南指出,降低尿酸治疗对心血管疾病和慢性肾脏病进展有潜在益处;然而,这种治疗方案的效果仍不确定。在这项系统评价中,我们旨在评估降低尿酸治疗对主要不良心血管事件、全因死亡率、肾衰竭事件、血压和肾小球滤过率的疗效。
设计、设置、参与者和测量方法: 我们系统地检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,以获取截至 2020 年 7 月发表的试验。我们纳入了前瞻性、随机、对照试验,评估了至少 6 个月降低尿酸治疗对心血管或肾脏结局的影响。两位作者独立将相关信息提取到电子表格中。使用随机效应荟萃分析总结治疗效果。
我们确定了 28 项试验,共纳入 6458 名参与者,其中 506 名发生主要不良心血管事件,266 名发生肾衰竭事件。总体而言,降低尿酸治疗并未显示出对主要不良心血管事件(风险比,0.93;95%置信区间,0.74 至 1.18)和全因死亡率(风险比,1.04;95%置信区间,0.78 至 1.39)或肾衰竭(风险比,0.97;95%置信区间,0.61 至 1.54)的益处。然而,降低尿酸治疗可减缓肾小球滤过率下降的斜率(加权平均差异,1.18 ml/min/1.73 m/年;95%置信区间,0.44 至 1.91),并降低平均血压(收缩压:加权平均差异,-3.45 mmHg;95%置信区间,-6.10 至-0.80;舒张压:加权平均差异,-2.02 mmHg;95%置信区间,-3.25 至-0.78)。接受降尿酸治疗的参与者与对照组之间的不良事件风险无显著差异(风险比,1.01;95%置信区间,0.94 至 1.08)。
降低尿酸治疗并未对主要不良心血管事件、全因死亡率和肾衰竭等临床结局产生益处。因此,没有足够的证据支持通过降低尿酸来改善肾脏和心血管结局。