Department of Family Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Family Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Oct;8(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000327.
The objective of the study is to determine the effect of background, affect, trouble, handling and empathy (BATHE) versus usual interview technique on patient satisfaction during regular consultation with family physicians in ambulatory care.
The research design was a prospective, randomised control trial.
The trial took place in a family practice unit in South India, which was one of the clinical service units of the academic Department of Family Medicine of a tertiary hospital.
The eligible participants were adults above the age of 18 years, who did not have any acute presenting illness. The participants should have given consent and also not have any cognitive disability. A total of 138 participants took part in the trial, 70 in BATHE group and 68 in the non-BATHE group. All participants entering the trial completed the questionnaire.
The BATHE group had a significantly higher mean score for questions grouped under professional satisfaction. This included questions on whether the patient felt that the physician treated them as a person and also whether they felt the appropriate clinical examination was communicated to them. The questionnaire used for scoring satisfaction had 18 questions with a maximum possible score of 90. When taking a cut-off of 75% (68) from the total possible score of 90, 72.9% (51) of the participants for whom the BATHE consultation technique was used were satisfied as compared with only 55.9% (30) for whom the routine consultation was carried out. This was statistically significant (χ=11.15, p value=0.0006) CONCLUSION: The study suggests that using BATHE in this family practice centre is beneficial in improving the perception of person centeredness in the consultation. However, further studies ruling out all possible bias are needed in our setting before the range of probable benefits of the BATHE technique can be fully gauged.
本研究旨在确定背景、情感、烦恼、处理和同理心(BATHE)与常规访谈技术相比,对门诊家庭医生常规就诊中患者满意度的影响。
研究设计为前瞻性、随机对照试验。
该试验在印度南部的一个家庭实践单位进行,该单位是一家三级医院的家庭医学学术部门的临床服务单位之一。
合格的参与者为年龄在 18 岁以上、没有急性发作疾病的成年人。参与者应同意并没有认知障碍。共有 138 名参与者参加了试验,70 名参与者在 BATHE 组,68 名参与者在非 BATHE 组。所有进入试验的参与者都完成了问卷。
BATHE 组在专业满意度分组问题上的平均得分显著更高。这包括患者是否觉得医生将他们视为一个人,以及他们是否觉得适当的临床检查已经与他们沟通的问题。用于评分满意度的问卷有 18 个问题,满分为 90 分。当从 90 分的总可能分数中取 75%(68)的截止分数时,使用 BATHE 咨询技术的 72.9%(51)的参与者感到满意,而仅进行常规咨询的 55.9%(30)的参与者感到满意。这具有统计学意义(χ=11.15,p 值=0.0006)。
本研究表明,在这个家庭实践中心使用 BATHE 有助于提高咨询中以患者为中心的感知。然而,在我们的环境中,需要进行排除所有可能偏倚的进一步研究,才能充分评估 BATHE 技术的可能益处范围。