Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 20;103(2):146-154. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00024.
The apparently physiological kinematics of the bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS TKA) systems have been attributed to the anterior and posterior post-cam mechanism. Although comparisons between TKA designs with either a retained or a sacrificed cruciate ligament have been conducted, we are not aware of any analyses of 2 implants with identical bearing geometry but different cruciate-ligament strategies under equal loading conditions. Knowledge about the kinematic effect of the different cruciate ligament strategies would potentially be valuable to facilitate preoperative planning and decision-making with regard to selecting the most appropriate implant for a patient.
This retrospective study included 20 patients: 10 treated with a BCS and 10 treated with a cruciate retaining (CR) TKA. Fluoroscopic analyses during high-flexion activities (unloaded flexion-extension and loaded lunge) were conducted at 24 months postsurgery. All patients completed the Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, and High-Flexion Knee Score questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively.
The BCS cohort showed greater femoral lateral rollback as well as a medial pivot in both activities. In contrast, the CR cohort showed a significant increase in anterior translation on the medial compartment as well as almost absent femoral lateral rollback. Higher clinical scores were observed in the BCS cohort.
At 24 months postsurgery, despite equal bearing geometry, retention of the posterior cruciate ligament in the CR cohort apparently was insufficient to reduce anterior shift. The BCS cohort showed expected knee joint kinematics; however, the kinematics in this cohort could eventually benefit from a smooth transition between the interchanging surfaces. Further investigation should be focused on the surgical technique and its interaction with the TKA design.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
双髁稳定型全膝关节置换术(BCS TKA)系统的前、后髁后凸轮机制被认为是其具有明显的生理性运动学。尽管已经对保留或牺牲交叉韧带的 TKA 设计进行了比较,但我们不知道在相同的加载条件下,有哪些对具有相同的轴承几何形状但不同交叉韧带策略的 2 种植入物的分析。了解不同交叉韧带策略的运动学效果可能有助于为患者选择最合适的植入物提供术前规划和决策方面的帮助。
本回顾性研究纳入了 20 例患者:10 例接受 BCS 治疗,10 例接受保留交叉韧带(CR)TKA 治疗。术后 24 个月进行了高屈曲活动(无负荷屈伸和负荷弓步)的荧光透视分析。所有患者在术前和术后均完成了膝关节协会评分(Knee Society Score)、遗忘关节评分(Forgotten Joint Score)和高屈曲膝关节评分(High-Flexion Knee Score)问卷。
BCS 组在两种活动中均显示出更大的股骨外侧后滚和内侧旋转。相比之下,CR 组在内侧间室中显示出明显的前向平移增加,并且股骨外侧后滚几乎不存在。BCS 组的临床评分较高。
术后 24 个月,尽管具有相同的轴承几何形状,但 CR 组保留后交叉韧带显然不足以减少前向移位。BCS 组显示出预期的膝关节运动学;然而,该组的运动学最终可能受益于在交换表面之间的平稳过渡。进一步的研究应集中在手术技术及其与 TKA 设计的相互作用上。
治疗水平 III。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者须知。