Suppr超能文献

改善低收入和中等收入国家0至6个月大儿童纯母乳喂养阶段线性生长的干预措施:一项网络和成对荟萃分析的系统评价

Interventions to improve linear growth during exclusive breastfeeding life-stage for children aged 0-6 months living in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review with network and pairwise meta-analyses.

作者信息

Park Jay J H, Siden Ellie, Harari Ofir, Dron Louis, Mazoub Reham, Jeziorska Virginia, Zannat Noor-E, Gadalla Heather, Thorlund Kristian, Mills Edward J

机构信息

MTEK Sciences, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1J5, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.

出版信息

Gates Open Res. 2020 Sep 24;3:1720. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13082.2. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) during the first six months of life is critical for child's linear growth. While there is strong evidence in favor of EBF, the evidence with regards to other interventions for linear growth is unclear. We evaluated intervention domains of micronutrients, food supplements, deworming, maternal education, water sanitation and hygiene (WASH), and kangaroo care, for their comparative effectiveness on linear growth. For this review, we searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of the interventions provided to infants aged 0-6 months and/or their breastfeeding mothers in low- and middle-income countries reporting on length-for-age z-score (LAZ), stunting, length, and head circumference. We searched for reports published until September 17 , 2019 and hand-searched bibliographies of existing reviews. For LAZ and stunting, we used network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effects of all interventions except for kangaroo care, where we used pairwise meta-analysis to compare its effects versus standard-of-care. For length and head circumference, we qualitatively summarized our findings. We found 29 RCTs (40 papers) involving 35,119 mother and infant pairs reporting on the effects of aforementioned interventions on linear growth outcomes. Our NMA on LAZ found that compared to standard-of-care, multiple micronutrients administered to infants (MMN-C) improved LAZ (mean difference: 0.20; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.03,0.35), whereas supplementing breastfeeding mothers with MMN did not (MMN-M, mean difference: -0.02, 95%CrI: -0.18,0.13). No interventions including MMN-C (relative risk: 0.74; 95%CrI: 0.36,1.44) reduced risk for stunting compared to standard-of-care. Kangaroo care, on the other hand, improved head circumference (mean difference: 0.20 cm/week; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.09,0.31 cm/week) and length (mean difference: 0.23 cm/week; 95%CI: 0.10,0.35 cm/week) compared to standard-of-care.   Our study found important improvements for kangaroo care, but we did not find sufficient evidence for other interventions. PROSPERO CRD42018110450; registered on 17 October 2018.

摘要

出生后头六个月进行纯母乳喂养对儿童的线性生长至关重要。虽然有强有力的证据支持纯母乳喂养,但关于其他促进线性生长的干预措施的证据尚不清楚。我们评估了微量营养素、食物补充剂、驱虫、孕产妇教育、水环境卫生与个人卫生(WASH)以及袋鼠式护理等干预领域对线性生长的相对有效性。在本次综述中,我们检索了在低收入和中等收入国家为0至6个月婴儿和/或其母乳喂养母亲提供的干预措施的随机临床试验(RCT),这些试验报告了年龄别身长Z评分(LAZ)、发育迟缓、身长和头围情况。我们检索了截至2019年9月17日发表的报告,并人工检索了现有综述的参考文献目录。对于LAZ和发育迟缓,我们使用网状Meta分析(NMA)来比较除袋鼠式护理之外的所有干预措施的效果,对于袋鼠式护理,我们使用成对Meta分析来比较其与标准护理的效果。对于身长和头围,我们对研究结果进行了定性总结。我们发现29项RCT(40篇论文),涉及35119对母婴,报告了上述干预措施对线性生长结局的影响。我们对LAZ的NMA发现,与标准护理相比,给婴儿补充多种微量营养素(MMN-C)可改善LAZ(平均差值:0.20;95%可信区间[CrI]:0.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7c/7536364/004fb5c24f47/gatesopenres-3-14382-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验