Jagan Nikhil, Morrow Lee E, Walters Ryan W, Klein Lauren P, Wallen Tanner J, Chung Jacqueline, Plambeck Robert W
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Nebraska-Western Iowa VA Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Oct 1;2(10):e0229. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000229. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Given perceived similarities between coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia and the acute respiratory distress syndrome, we explored whether awake self-proning improved outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019-infected patients treated in a rural medical center with limited resources during a significant local coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak.
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data.
Single-center rural community-based medical center in Grand Island, NE.
One hundred five nonintubated, coronavirus disease-infected patients.
None.
After patients were educated on the benefits of awake self-proning, compliance was voluntary. The primary outcome was need for intubation during the hospital stay; secondary outcomes included serial peripheral capillary oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry to the Fio ratios, in-hospital mortality, and discharge disposition. Of 105 nonintubated, coronavirus disease-infected patients, 40 tolerated awake self-proning. Patients who were able to prone were younger and had lower disease severity. The risk of intubation was lower in proned patients after adjusting for disease severity using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.96; = 0.043) or Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.91; = 0.034). No prone patient died compared with 24.6% of patients who were not prone ( < 0.001; number needed to treat = 5; 95% CI, 3-8). The probability of being discharged alive and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry to the Fio ratios were statistically similar for both groups.
Awake self-proning was associated with lower mortality and intubation rates in coronavirus disease 2019-infected patients. Prone positioning appears to be a safe and inexpensive strategy to improve outcomes and spare limited resources. Prospective efforts are needed to better delineate the effect of awake proning on oxygenation and to improve patients' ability to tolerate this intervention.
鉴于2019冠状病毒病肺炎与急性呼吸窘迫综合征之间存在明显相似之处,我们探讨了在当地2019冠状病毒病大爆发期间,在资源有限的农村医疗中心接受治疗的2019冠状病毒病感染患者中,清醒状态下的自主俯卧位是否能改善预后。
对前瞻性收集的临床数据进行回顾性分析。
内布拉斯加州格兰德艾兰的单中心农村社区医疗中心。
105名未插管的2019冠状病毒病感染患者。
无。
在向患者介绍了清醒状态下自主俯卧位的益处后,患者自愿配合。主要结局是住院期间是否需要插管;次要结局包括通过脉搏血氧饱和度测量的系列外周毛细血管血氧饱和度与吸氧浓度比值、住院死亡率和出院情况。在105名未插管的2019冠状病毒病感染患者中,40名患者耐受清醒状态下的自主俯卧位。能够进行俯卧位的患者更年轻,疾病严重程度更低。使用序贯器官衰竭评估评分调整疾病严重程度后,俯卧位患者插管风险更低(调整后风险比为0.30;95%置信区间为0.09 - 0.96;P = 0.043),或使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II评分调整后也是如此(调整后风险比为0.30;95%置信区间为0.10 - 0.91;P = 0.034)。没有俯卧位患者死亡,而非俯卧位患者的死亡率为24.6%(P < 0.001;治疗所需人数为5;95%置信区间为3 - 8)。两组患者存活出院的概率以及通过脉搏血氧饱和度测量的外周毛细血管血氧饱和度与吸氧浓度比值在统计学上相似。
清醒状态下的自主俯卧位与2019冠状病毒病感染患者较低的死亡率和插管率相关。俯卧位似乎是一种安全且廉价的策略,可改善预后并节省有限的资源。需要开展前瞻性研究,以更好地阐明清醒俯卧位对氧合的影响,并提高患者耐受这种干预的能力。