Am Nat. 2020 Nov;196(5):555-565. doi: 10.1086/711020. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
AbstractThe nests built by social insects are complex group-level structures that emerge from interactions among individuals following simple behavioral rules. Nest patterns vary among species, and the theory of complex systems predicts that there is no simple one-to-one relationship between variation in collective patterns and variation in individual behaviors. Therefore, a species-by-species comparison of the actual building process is essential to understand the mechanism producing diverse nest patterns. Here, we compare tunnel formation of three termite sp ecies and reveal two mechanisms producing interspecific variation: in one, a common behavioral rule yields distinct patterns via parameter tuning, and in the other, distinct rules produce similar patterns. We found that two related species transport sand in the same way using mandibles but build tunnels with different degrees of branching. The variation arises from different probabilities of choosing between two behavioral options at crowded tunnel faces: excavating the sidewall to make a new branch or waiting for clearance to extend the current tunnel. We further discovered that a third species independently evolved low-branched patterns using different building rules, namely, a bucket brigade that can excavate a crowded tunnel. Our findings emphasize the importance of direct comparative study of collective behaviors at both individual and group levels.
摘要 社会性昆虫所建造的巢穴是一种复杂的群体结构,它是个体之间遵循简单行为规则相互作用的结果。巢穴模式在物种间存在差异,复杂系统理论预测,在集体模式的变化和个体行为的变化之间不存在简单的一一对应关系。因此,对实际的建筑过程进行逐个物种的比较对于理解产生不同巢穴模式的机制至关重要。在这里,我们比较了三种白蚁物种的隧道形成过程,并揭示了产生种间变异的两种机制:一种是通过参数调整,共同的行为规则产生不同的模式;另一种是不同的规则产生相似的模式。我们发现,两种亲缘关系密切的物种使用下颚以相同的方式运输沙子,但隧道的分支程度不同。这种变异源于在拥挤的隧道口选择两种行为选项的概率不同:是在侧壁上挖掘一个新的分支,还是等待清理空间来延长当前的隧道。我们进一步发现,第三种物种使用不同的建筑规则独立进化出了低分支模式,即一种可以挖掘拥挤隧道的桶式搬运。我们的研究结果强调了在个体和群体层面上直接比较集体行为的重要性。