• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用锥形束计算机断层扫描、计算机辅助设计的口内扫描和修复驱动的种植体规划技术对牙周表型进行体内评估。

In Vivo Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotypes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Intraoral Scanning by Computer-Aided Design, and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Technology.

作者信息

Bednarz-Tumidajewicz Magdalena, Sender-Janeczek Aleksandra, Zborowski Jacek, Gedrange Tomasz, Konopka Tomasz, Prylińska-Czyżewska Agata, Dembowska Elżbieta, Bednarz Wojciech

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Specialist Outpatient Medical Clinic MEDIDENT, Gorlice, Poland.

Department of Periodontology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2020 Oct 16;26:e924469. doi: 10.12659/MSM.924469.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.924469
PMID:33064673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7574361/
Abstract

BACKGROUND Two clinical parameters, the gingival thickness (GT) and the width of keratinized tissue (WKT), describe the gingival phenotype, which is defined as the 3-dimensional volume of the gingiva. The periodontal phenotype additionally includes the thickness of the labial plate of the alveolar crest (TLPAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty patients with healthy periodontium on the upper canines and incisors underwent measurements for crestal, supracrestal, free gingival thickness (FGT), the alveolar crest-gingival margin (AC-GM), alveolar crest-cementoenamel junction distance, and the TLPAC at 2, 4, and 8 mm apically from the edge of the alveolar crest using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with computer-aided design and prosthetic-driven implant planning technology. For each tooth, the gingival and periodontal phenotype was evaluated on the basis of the gingival thickness, width of keratinized tissue (WKT), and TLPAC measurements. Each patient's periodontal phenotype was evaluated according to the coronal width/length ratio of both the upper central incisors. RESULTS The dentogingival units had varying average values for the 3 periodontal phenotypes (thin phenotype: FGT 0.65±0.06 mm, WKT 4.85±1.18 mm, AC-GM 3.17±0.64 mm, TLPAC2 0.66±0.28 mm; medium phenotype: FGT 0.87±0.07 mm, WKT 5.49±1.23 mm, AC-GM 3.36±0.65 mm, TLPAC2 0.76±0.37 mm; and thick phenotype: FGT 1.20 mm, WKT 6.00 mm, AC-GM 3.90 mm, TLPAC2 0.90 mm). Positive correlations were seen among WKT, FGT, AC-GM, and TLPAC2. CONCLUSIONS Positive correlations between the FGT and WKT, and the AC-GM distance confirm that measurements using CBCT with computer-aided design and prosthetic-driven implant planning technology can evaluate the gingival phenotype and TLPAC2 for the periodontal phenotype.

摘要

背景

牙龈厚度(GT)和角化组织宽度(WKT)这两个临床参数描述了牙龈表型,牙龈表型被定义为牙龈的三维体积。牙周表型还包括牙槽嵴唇侧板厚度(TLPAC)。材料与方法:30例上颌尖牙和切牙牙周健康的患者,使用锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)结合计算机辅助设计和修复驱动的种植规划技术,测量从牙槽嵴边缘向根尖2、4和8mm处的嵴顶、嵴上、游离牙龈厚度(FGT)、牙槽嵴-牙龈边缘(AC-GM)、牙槽嵴-牙骨质釉质界距离以及TLPAC。对于每颗牙齿,根据牙龈厚度、角化组织宽度(WKT)和TLPAC测量值评估牙龈和牙周表型。根据上颌中切牙的冠宽/长比评估每位患者的牙周表型。结果:牙-牙龈单位的三种牙周表型具有不同的平均值(薄表型:FGT 0.65±0.06mm,WKT 4.85±1.18mm,AC-GM 3.17±0.64mm,TLPAC2 0.66±0.28mm;中等表型:FGT 0.87±0.07mm,WKT 5.49±1.23mm,AC-GM 3.36±0.65mm,TLPAC2 0.76±0.37mm;厚表型:FGT 1.20mm,WKT 6.00mm,AC-GM 3.90mm,TLPAC2 0.90mm)。WKT、FGT、AC-GM和TLPAC2之间存在正相关。结论:FGT与WKT以及AC-GM距离之间的正相关证实,使用CBCT结合计算机辅助设计和修复驱动的种植规划技术进行测量,可以评估牙龈表型和牙周表型的TLPAC2。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/f819922bab4a/medscimonit-26-e924469-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/51905d52b0eb/medscimonit-26-e924469-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/dde96d6bb783/medscimonit-26-e924469-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/9ce796b9cb2f/medscimonit-26-e924469-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/516ee46c206a/medscimonit-26-e924469-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/fc688e35ebd9/medscimonit-26-e924469-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/a8c4dccfa26f/medscimonit-26-e924469-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/f819922bab4a/medscimonit-26-e924469-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/51905d52b0eb/medscimonit-26-e924469-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/dde96d6bb783/medscimonit-26-e924469-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/9ce796b9cb2f/medscimonit-26-e924469-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/516ee46c206a/medscimonit-26-e924469-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/fc688e35ebd9/medscimonit-26-e924469-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/a8c4dccfa26f/medscimonit-26-e924469-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860c/7574361/f819922bab4a/medscimonit-26-e924469-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
In Vivo Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotypes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Intraoral Scanning by Computer-Aided Design, and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Technology.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描、计算机辅助设计的口内扫描和修复驱动的种植体规划技术对牙周表型进行体内评估。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Oct 16;26:e924469. doi: 10.12659/MSM.924469.
2
Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Method and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Combined with Intraoral Scanning and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Method in Determining the Gingival Phenotype in the Healthy Periodontium.超声法与锥形束 CT 结合口内扫描及基于修复体的种植导板设计方法在确定健康牙周组织龈生物型中的效果比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12276. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912276.
3
Dimensions of the dentogingival tissue in the anterior maxilla. A CBCT descriptive cross-sectional study.上颌前部牙龈组织的维度。一项 CBCT 描述性横断面研究。
Int J Esthet Dent. 2021 Oct 29;16(4):580-592.
4
Assessment of gingival biotype and facial hard/soft tissue dimensions in the maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估上颌前牙区牙龈生物型及面部软硬组织尺寸。
Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Jul;79:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
Changes of Periodontal Parameters after Apical Surgery: Correlation of Clinical and Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Data.根尖手术后牙周参数的变化:临床与锥形束计算机断层扫描数据的相关性
J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):876-884. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
6
Relationship between supracrestal soft tissue dimensions and other periodontal phenotypic features: A cross-sectional study.牙骨质上方软组织维度与其他牙周表型特征的关系:一项横断面研究。
J Periodontol. 2023 Aug;94(8):944-955. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0434. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
7
Correlation analysis of periodontal tissue dimensions in the esthetic zone using a non-invasive digital method.使用非侵入性数字方法对美学区牙周组织尺寸进行相关性分析。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021 Apr;51(2):88-99. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2003460173.
8
[Digitalized analysis of the gingival and bone morphology in the maxillary anterior teeth in patient with posterior dental implant].[后牙种植患者上颌前牙区牙龈及骨形态的数字化分析]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 9;57(4):340-345. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20220202-00042.
9
Clinical and tomography evaluation of periodontal phenotypes of Brazilian dental students.巴西牙科学生牙周表型的临床与断层扫描评估
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 May-Jun;25(3):207-212. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_497_20. Epub 2021 May 3.
10
Assessment of the correlation between supracrestal gingival tissue dimensions and other periodontal phenotypes components via the digital registration method: a cross‑sectional study in a Chinese population.通过数字化登记方法评估龈上组织维度与其他牙周表型成分之间的相关性:一项中国人群的横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04158-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital photometric analysis as a non-invasive method to determine gingival phenotype: A comparative study.数字光度分析作为一种确定牙龈表型的非侵入性方法:一项比较研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Nov;36(11):1466-1471. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.005. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
A comparative study of the application of three digital imaging techniques to assess the thickness of the palatal mucosa of the maxillary anterior teeth.三种数字化成像技术在上颌前牙腭侧黏骨膜厚度评估中应用的对比研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1137. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04896-1.
3
Difference in Buccal Gingival Thickness between the Mandible and Maxilla in the Aesthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of CBCT with different voxel sizes and intraoral scanner for detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.不同体素尺寸锥形束 CT 与口内扫描仪检测牙周缺损的比较:一项体外研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Jul;49(5):20190197. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190197. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
2
Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various registration methods.不同配准方法下口内扫描和锥形束 CT 扫描牙冠的配准精度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Mar;157(3):348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.031.
3
Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry.
美学区域下颌骨与上颌骨颊侧牙龈厚度的差异:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 20;13(6):1789. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061789.
4
A novel approach for gingiva thickness measurements around lower anterior teeth by means of dental magnetic resonance imaging.一种通过口腔磁共振成像测量下前牙牙龈厚度的新方法。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec 23;28(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05459-4.
5
Gingival phenotype determination: Cutoff values, relationship between gingival and alveolar crest bone thickness at different landmarks.牙龈表型测定:截断值,不同标志点处牙龈与牙槽嵴骨厚度之间的关系。
J Dent Sci. 2023 Oct;18(4):1544-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
6
Current landmarks for gingival thickness evaluation in maxillary anterior teeth: a systematic review.当前上颌前牙牙龈厚度评估的地标:系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Apr;27(4):1363-1389. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04898-3. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
7
Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Method and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Combined with Intraoral Scanning and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Method in Determining the Gingival Phenotype in the Healthy Periodontium.超声法与锥形束 CT 结合口内扫描及基于修复体的种植导板设计方法在确定健康牙周组织龈生物型中的效果比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12276. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912276.
不同口内扫描仪-计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件组合在数字化牙科中的精度评估。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jan 3;26:e918529. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918529.
4
Reliability and accuracy of linear measurements in cone-beam computed tomography using different software programs and voxel sizes.使用不同软件程序和体素大小的锥束计算机断层扫描中线性测量的可靠性和准确性。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;21(6):607-612. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_314_18.
5
Reproducibility of the PIROP ultrasonic biometer for gingival thickness measurements.PIROP 超声生物仪测量牙龈厚度的可重复性。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 May;31(3):263-267. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12446. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
A novel soft tissue thickness measuring method using cone beam computed tomography.一种使用锥形束计算机断层扫描的新型软组织厚度测量方法。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Nov;30(6):516-522. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12428. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
7
The repeatability and reproducibility of gingival thickness measurement with an ultrasonic device.使用超声设备测量牙龈厚度的可重复性和再现性。
Dent Med Probl. 2018 Jul-Sep;55(3):281-288. doi: 10.17219/dmp/95111.
8
Noninvasive evaluation of the correlation between thickness of the buccal bone and attached gingiva of maxillary premolars.非侵入性评估上颌前磨牙颊侧骨厚度与附着龈的相关性。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 May;31(3):240-245. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12395. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
9
Gingival thickness assessment at the mandibular incisors with four methods: A cross-sectional study.四种方法评估下颌切牙的牙龈厚度:一项横断面研究。
J Periodontol. 2018 Nov;89(11):1300-1309. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0125. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
10
Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions.系统疾病及发育和获得性状况的牙周表现:2017 年牙周病和种植体周围病分类世界研讨会第 3 工作组的共识报告。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S219-S229. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12951.