assistant professor of social work and affiliate faculty, Women & Gender Studies.
student and undergraduate research assistant, Department of Social Work, Harris College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth.
Soc Work. 2020 Oct 10;65(4):317-324. doi: 10.1093/sw/swaa039.
Despite gender being central to any given social issue and the profession of social work's commitment to social justice, gender and gender inequality remain tangential to mainstream social work goals as partially indicated by the Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative led by the American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare. Feminist methodologists prioritize the investigation of gender inequality by elevating the voices of oppressed groups, particularly women, using qualitative and mixed-methods studies, focusing on structural social change, and emphasizing the need for intersectional inquiry. Feminist and other critical methodologies frame structural inequality as central to the examination of all social issues and research questions. This study investigates the extent to which gender and gender inequality are investigated in mainstream social work research. Specifically, drawing on 404 research articles from three mainstream social work journals, this research relies on content analysis to demonstrate the dearth of studies examining gender and gender inequality in mainstream social work research. This work also presents opportunities for social workers to position gender as central to understanding persisting structural inequalities of the 21st century and work toward a more equitable social order.
尽管性别是任何给定社会问题的核心,社会工作专业也致力于社会正义,但正如美国社会工作学院和社会福利学院领导的“社会工作重大挑战”倡议部分表明的那样,性别和性别不平等仍然与主流社会工作目标没有直接关系。女性主义方法论学家通过提升受压迫群体(尤其是女性)的声音,优先考虑调查性别不平等问题,使用定性和混合方法研究,关注结构性社会变革,并强调需要进行交叉研究。女性主义和其他批判性方法将结构性不平等视为研究所有社会问题和研究问题的核心。本研究调查了在主流社会工作研究中对性别和性别不平等的研究程度。具体来说,本研究借鉴了三本主流社会工作期刊的 404 篇研究文章,运用内容分析法表明,主流社会工作研究中很少有研究关注性别和性别不平等。这项工作还为社会工作者提供了机会,将性别置于理解 21 世纪持续存在的结构性不平等的核心地位,并努力实现更公平的社会秩序。