• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为“信心照护”随机对照试验的一部分,对寄养照顾者的“培育变化”计划进行定性过程评估。

Qualitative process evaluation of the Fostering Changes program for foster carers as part of the Confidence in Care randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Children's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Nov;109:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104768. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104768
PMID:33065358
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fostering Changes is an in-service training program for foster carers designed to enhance carer skills, coping strategies and carer-child relationships. The training program has been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial comparing Fostering Changes to usual care.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a qualitative process evaluation drawing on stakeholder perspectives to describe the logic model of Fostering Changes, identify potential mechanisms of impact of the program and enhance understanding of the trial results.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Participants were stakeholders in the Fostering Changes program delivered in Wales, UK including foster carers invited to attend the program (18 attendees, eight non-attendees), two program developers, five trainers, 12 social workers who attended or recruited to the program.

METHODS

Total population sampling with qualitative data collection methods. Qualitative data were subject to thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A logic model summarising the program resources, activities and anticipated outcomes was generated. Implementation themes were quality of training, setting and group composition. Mechanisms of impact were identified with themes falling into two categories, group process and skills development. Potential barriers to effectiveness included a poor fit between the carer needs and the program in relation to levels of challenge being faced, age-appropriate content and responsiveness. Contextual factors were also relevant, including the existing relationship between foster carers and the agency and the perceived value of training.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the group aspects of the program were well received, the program itself did not help foster carers deal with more complex challenges and needed to be more targeted in terms of carers needs and circumstances.

摘要

背景

“培育变化”是一项为寄养照顾者设计的在职培训计划,旨在提高照顾者的技能、应对策略和照顾者与孩子的关系。该培训计划已在一项随机对照试验中进行了评估,将“培育变化”与常规护理进行了比较。

目的

从利益相关者的角度进行定性过程评估,描述“培育变化”的逻辑模型,确定该计划影响的潜在机制,并加深对试验结果的理解。

参与者和设置

参与者是英国威尔士“培育变化”计划的利益相关者,包括受邀参加该计划的寄养照顾者(18 名参与者,8 名未参与者)、两名计划开发者、五名培训师、12 名参加或招募该计划的社会工作者。

方法

采用全人群抽样和定性数据收集方法。对定性数据进行主题分析。

结果

生成了一个总结计划资源、活动和预期结果的逻辑模型。实施主题包括培训质量、设置和小组组成。确定了影响机制,主题分为两类,即小组过程和技能发展。潜在的有效性障碍包括照顾者需求与计划之间的不匹配,以及所面临的挑战程度、适合年龄的内容和响应能力。背景因素也很相关,包括寄养照顾者与机构之间的现有关系以及培训的感知价值。

结论

尽管该计划的小组方面受到了欢迎,但该计划本身并没有帮助寄养照顾者应对更复杂的挑战,需要根据照顾者的需求和情况更加有针对性。

相似文献

1
Qualitative process evaluation of the Fostering Changes program for foster carers as part of the Confidence in Care randomized controlled trial.作为“信心照护”随机对照试验的一部分,对寄养照顾者的“培育变化”计划进行定性过程评估。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Nov;109:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104768. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
2
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the fostering changes programme.促进变化计划的实用随机对照试验。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Oct;108:104646. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104646. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
3
Evaluating the long-term impact of the Fostering Changes training programme for foster carers in Wales, the Confidence in Care trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估威尔士针对寄养家庭照料者的“促进改变”培训计划的长期影响,即“关爱中的信心”试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2424-3.
4
What are the challenges when recruiting to a trial in children's social care? A qualitative evaluation of a trial of foster carer training.招募儿童社会关怀试验参与者时面临哪些挑战?寄养照顾者培训试验的定性评估。
Trials. 2021 Apr 1;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05186-9.
5
Effectiveness of a trauma-informed care psychoeducational program for foster carers - Evaluation of the Fostering Connections Program.创伤知情关怀心理教育方案对寄养照顾者的有效性-寄养关系方案的评估。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Apr;102:104390. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104390. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
6
Cognitive-behavioural training interventions for assisting foster carers in the management of difficult behaviour.认知行为训练干预措施,用于帮助寄养家庭照顾者管理困难行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD003760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003760.pub2.
7
Supporting the emotional needs of young people in care: a qualitative study of foster carer perspectives.关爱年轻人的情感需求:寄养照顾者观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 10;10(3):e033317. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033317.
8
The Reflective Fostering Programme-improving the wellbeing of children in care through a group intervention for foster carers: a randomised controlled trial.《反思式养育方案——通过对寄养父母的小组干预来提高寄养儿童的幸福感:一项随机对照试验》。
Trials. 2021 Nov 25;22(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05739-y.
9
How do foster carers manage the oral health of children in foster care? A qualitative study.寄养照顾者如何管理寄养儿童的口腔健康?一项定性研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;45(6):529-537. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12316. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
10
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
What are the challenges when recruiting to a trial in children's social care? A qualitative evaluation of a trial of foster carer training.招募儿童社会关怀试验参与者时面临哪些挑战?寄养照顾者培训试验的定性评估。
Trials. 2021 Apr 1;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05186-9.