• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Taylor 空间框架或扩髓髓内钉治疗胫骨骨干闭合性骨折:一项随机对照试验。

Taylor Spatial Frame or Reamed Intramedullary Nailing for Closed Fractures of the Tibial Shaft: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov;34(11):612-619. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001802.

DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001802
PMID:33065663
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare a modern ring fixator [Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF)] and reamed intramedullary nailing (IMN) for the treatment of closed tibial shaft fractures.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Two university hospitals.

PATIENTS

Patients between 18 and 70 years of age surgically treated for an acute tibial shaft fracture.

INTERVENTION

TSF (n = 31) versus a reamed intramedullary nail (n = 32). The patients were followed up for 2 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The physical component summary of Short Form 36 (SF-36) at 2 years was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included the other components of the SF-36, pain assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS), complications, and resource consumption.

RESULTS

The mean age was 43 years (SD 14.0), and 42 (67%) were men. The physical component summary at 2 years was 52.4 (SD 6.3) in the TSF group and 53.3 (SD 8.0) in the IMN group (P = 0.35). There were modest differences in the other SF-36 scores during the follow-up period. Up to and including 12 months, the TSF group had less knee pain [at 12 months: VAS 0.5 (SD 1.2) vs. VAS 2.4 (SD 2.2; P < 0.001)], but this was not statistically significant at 24 months [VAS 0.7 (SD 1.4) vs. VAS 1.5 (SD 2.0; P = 0.11)]. Superficial skin infections were more frequent in the TSF group [22 (71%) vs. 4 (13%); P < 0.001]. The number of other complications was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TSF and IMN provided good clinical results. TSF had more pin-track infections but less knee pain the first year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

比较现代环式固定器(Taylor Spatial Frame,TSF)与扩髓髓内钉(reamed intramedullary nailing,IMN)治疗闭合性胫骨骨干骨折的效果。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

两所大学医院。

患者

年龄 18-70 岁、接受急性胫骨骨干骨折手术治疗的患者。

干预

TSF(n=31)组与扩髓髓内钉(n=32)组。患者随访 2 年。

主要观察指标

2 年时的 36 项简短健康调查问卷(Short Form 36,SF-36)的生理成分综合评分是主要观察指标。次要观察指标包括 SF-36 的其他成分、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)评估的疼痛、并发症和资源消耗。

结果

平均年龄 43 岁(标准差 14.0),42 例(67%)为男性。TSF 组的 2 年时生理成分综合评分为 52.4(标准差 6.3)分,IMN 组为 53.3(标准差 8.0)分(P=0.35)。在随访期间,SF-36 的其他评分存在适度差异。在至 12 个月期间,TSF 组的膝关节疼痛较轻[12 个月时:VAS 0.5(标准差 1.2)分比 VAS 2.4(标准差 2.2;P<0.001)],但在 24 个月时无统计学差异[VAS 0.7(标准差 1.4)分比 VAS 1.5(标准差 2.0;P=0.11)]。TSF 组的浅表皮肤感染更为常见[22 例(71%)比 4 例(13%);P<0.001]。两组的其他并发症数量相似。

结论

TSF 和 IMN 均能获得良好的临床效果。TSF 组的针道感染较多,但第 1 年的膝关节疼痛较轻。

证据等级

治疗学Ⅰ级。欲了解完整的证据等级说明,请参见作者须知。

相似文献

1
Taylor Spatial Frame or Reamed Intramedullary Nailing for Closed Fractures of the Tibial Shaft: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Taylor 空间框架或扩髓髓内钉治疗胫骨骨干闭合性骨折:一项随机对照试验。
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov;34(11):612-619. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001802.
2
Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults.成人胫骨干骨折的髓内钉固定术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008241.pub2.
3
Effect of acute reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing on compartment pressure when treating closed tibial shaft fractures: a randomized prospective study.治疗闭合性胫骨干骨折时急性扩髓与非扩髓髓内钉固定对骨筋膜室压力的影响:一项随机前瞻性研究
J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Nov;14(8):554-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200011000-00006.
4
Reaming Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes After Open and Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.扩髓不影响开放性和闭合性胫骨干骨折后的功能结局:一项随机对照试验的结果
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Mar;30(3):142-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000497.
5
A prospective multi-center study of intramedullary nailing vs casting of stable tibial shaft fractures.一项关于稳定型胫骨干骨折髓内钉固定与石膏固定的前瞻性多中心研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Mar;18(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10195-016-0429-4. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
6
A meta-analysis of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of closed tibial fractures.一项关于扩髓与非扩髓髓内钉治疗闭合性胫骨骨折的荟萃分析。
Orthopedics. 2014 Apr;37(4):e332-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140401-52.
7
Smoking, Obesity, and Disability Benefits or Litigation Are Not Associated with Clinically Important Reductions in Physical Functioning After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.吸烟、肥胖、残疾福利或诉讼与股骨干髓内钉固定后临床重要的体力功能改善无关:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Apr 1;479(4):805-813. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001573.
8
Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.随机、前瞻性比较钢板与髓内钉固定治疗胫骨骨干远端骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Dec;25(12):736-41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318213f709.
9
Economic evaluation of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing in patients with closed and open tibial fractures: results from the study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures (SPRINT).扩髓与非扩髓髓内钉治疗闭合性和开放性胫骨骨折的经济学评价:前瞻性评价胫骨骨折患者使用扩髓髓内钉(SPRINT)研究的结果。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.034. Epub 2011 May 25.
10
Prevalence and risk factors for re-interventions following reamed intramedullary tibia nailing.扩髓胫骨髓内钉固定术后再次干预的发生率及危险因素
Injury. 2016 Dec;47 Suppl 7:S49-S52. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30855-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixation for tibial shaft fractures: an explorative analysis of muscle strength from the IMVEX trial.胫骨干骨折的髓内钉固定与外固定架固定:来自IMVEX试验的肌肉力量探索性分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jul 18;145(1):379. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05995-6.
2
Outcomes of the hexapod frame in 111 'high risk' tibial fractures.111例“高危”胫骨骨折采用六足框架固定的治疗结果。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jul 14;6(7):816-821. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0023.R1.
3
Hexaxial external fixator versus intramedullary nail in treating segmental tibial fractures: a retrospective study.
六轴外固定架与髓内钉治疗胫骨节段性骨折:回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02327-0.
4
Chronic knee pain following infrapatellar/suprapatellar magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails versus external fixators in limb length discrepancy: A retrospective review.髌下/髌上磁性髓内延长钉与外固定架治疗肢体长度不等后慢性膝关节疼痛的回顾性研究
J Orthop. 2023 Dec 6;51:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.071. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures.更新的随机对照试验荟萃分析比较了外固定与髓内钉治疗开放性胫骨骨折的疗效。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 14;59(7):1301. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071301.
6
Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with Combined Use of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Plates and Taylor Spatial Frame for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎患者采用患者特异性 3D 打印钢板结合 Taylor 空间架行楔形胫骨高位截骨术的治疗
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Dec 1;2021:8609921. doi: 10.1155/2021/8609921. eCollection 2021.
7
Intraoperative acute correction versus postoperative gradual correction for tibial shaft fractures with multiplanar posttraumatic deformities using the hexapod external fixator.应用六足外固定架治疗多平面创伤后畸形的胫骨骨干骨折:术中急性矫正与术后逐渐矫正的比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04505-0.
8
Management of high-energy tibial shaft fractures using the hexapod circular external fixator.使用六足环状外固定架治疗高能胫骨骨干骨折。
BMC Surg. 2021 Feb 21;21(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01106-5.