Department of Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Medical Faculty, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 13;17(20):7433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207433.
University students were confronted with abrupt changes to their daily lives by the COVID-19 lock-down. We investigated Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) and anxiety levels, and the association between perceived impact on well-being, studies, and daily lives and anxiety levels, adjusted for gender, age, social class and affiliation. Early in the lock-down all students of the Zurich University of Applied Sciences ( = 12,429) were invited to a voluntary longitudinal health survey. Participation rate was 20% ( = 2437): 70% females, median age 25 yrs. (IQR 23-28). A total of 10% reported a deterioration of well-being compared to pre-Corona. LCA yielded three classes varying in perceived COVID-19 impact: 1 (low, = 675), 2 (moderate, = 1098), and 3 (strong, = 656). Adjusted proportion of moderate to severe anxiety by class were 45% (95% CI: 28.0-62.0), 15.5% (95% CI: 13.1-17.9), and 5.1% (95% CI: 4.7-5.6), respectively. Multivariate regression analyses yielded an OR for moderate to severe anxiety of 3.88 (95% CI: 2.5-6.0, class 2) and 22.43 (95% CI: 14.5-34.6, class 3) compared to class-1. The investigated association implies that containment measures have a selective effect on anxiety in students. The diversity of students' perception and associated anxiety should be monitored and considered in future response to pandemics.
大学生的日常生活因 COVID-19 封锁而发生了突然的变化。我们调查了广泛性焦虑症量表 7 项(GAD-7)和焦虑水平,以及感知对幸福感、学业和日常生活的影响与焦虑水平之间的关联,并根据性别、年龄、社会阶层和所属关系进行了调整。在封锁早期,苏黎世应用科学大学的所有学生(=12429 人)都被邀请参加一项自愿的纵向健康调查。参与率为 20%(=2437 人):女性占 70%,中位数年龄为 25 岁(IQR 23-28)。共有 10%的人报告说,与新冠病毒大流行前相比,幸福感下降了。潜在类别分析得出了三个类别,其感知新冠病毒影响不同:1(低,=675)、2(中,=1098)和 3(高,=656)。按类别调整的中度至重度焦虑比例分别为 45%(95%CI:28.0-62.0)、15.5%(95%CI:13.1-17.9)和 5.1%(95%CI:4.7-5.6)。多变量回归分析显示,与类别 1 相比,中度至重度焦虑的优势比为 3.88(95%CI:2.5-6.0,类别 2)和 22.43(95%CI:14.5-34.6,类别 3)。调查结果表明,遏制措施对学生的焦虑有选择性影响。应该监测和考虑学生感知和相关焦虑的多样性,以便在未来应对大流行。