• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜喉咽手术联合内镜黏膜下剥离术的联合治疗。

Co-treatment with endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Jun;48(3):457-463. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2020.10.003
PMID:33067052
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS) is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for pharyngeal cancers. However, the disadvantages of ELPS are the interference of instruments in the operative field and the difficulty in approaching certain areas. To overcome these drawbacks, we began to perform combination treatment of ELPS and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacies of treatment with ELPS alone and ELPS combined with ESD.

METHODS

A total of 103 lesions in 73 patients who underwent pharyngeal ELPS for superficial pharyngeal cancer between August 2014 and January 2020 at our hospital were analyzed. Lesions were divided into the ELPS alone group and ELPS combined with ESD group. Lesion characteristics, technical results, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the ELPS combined with ESD group, procedure speed was shorter than the ELPS alone group (20.2 ± 10.0 mm/min vs 13.0 ± 6.6 mm/min, p < 0.001), and R0 resection rate was higher (67.4% vs 45.6%, p = 0.027). There were no significant differences in tumor size, depth of tumor invasion, and adverse events among the 2 groups. These results remained unchanged after propensity score matching. The overall and cause-specific survival rates at 3 years were 96.7% and 100% for the ELPS combined with ESD group and ELPS alone group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination treatment of ESD and ELPS enabled more efficient resection than ELPS alone. Cooperative treatment of pharyngeal cancer patients involving gastroenterologists and head and neck surgeons is effective and beneficial, and results in favorable long-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

内镜下咽及喉切除术(ELPS)是治疗咽癌的一种有效、微创的方法。然而,ELPS 的缺点是手术野中器械的干扰以及某些区域难以接近。为了克服这些缺点,我们开始进行 ELPS 和内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的联合治疗。本研究旨在比较单独行 ELPS 与 ELPS 联合 ESD 治疗的疗效。

方法

分析了 2014 年 8 月至 2020 年 1 月我院收治的 73 例因早期下咽癌接受咽 ELPS 治疗的患者的 103 处病变。病变分为单独 ELPS 组和 ELPS 联合 ESD 组。分析病变特征、技术结果、不良事件和长期结果。

结果

在 ELPS 联合 ESD 组中,手术速度快于单独 ELPS 组(20.2±10.0mm/min 比 13.0±6.6mm/min,p<0.001),R0 切除率更高(67.4%比 45.6%,p=0.027)。两组肿瘤大小、肿瘤浸润深度和不良事件无显著差异。倾向评分匹配后结果仍不变。ELPS 联合 ESD 组和单独 ELPS 组的 3 年总生存率和病因特异性生存率分别为 96.7%和 100%。

结论

ESD 联合 ELPS 的联合治疗比单独 ELPS 更能有效地进行切除。胃肠病学家和头颈外科医生联合治疗咽癌患者是有效和有益的,可获得良好的长期结果。

相似文献

1
Co-treatment with endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜喉咽手术联合内镜黏膜下剥离术的联合治疗。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Jun;48(3):457-463. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
2
Efficacy of polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue for the prevention of post-ELPS bleeding.聚乙二醇酸片和纤维蛋白胶预防内镜下食管贲门黏膜撕裂套扎术后出血的疗效。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Jun;48(3):471-476. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.09.021. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Complications After Endoscopic Laryngopharyngeal Surgery.内镜下咽手术术后并发症
Laryngoscope. 2018 Jul;128(7):1546-1550. doi: 10.1002/lary.26953. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
Comparative analyses of short- and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for superficial pharyngeal carcinomas.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与内镜下咽-喉手术治疗浅表性咽癌的短期和长期疗效比较分析。
DEN Open. 2024 Sep 12;5(1):e70003. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70003. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Transoral surgery for laryngo-pharyngeal cancer - The paradigm shift of the head and cancer treatment.喉咽癌的经口手术——头颈癌治疗的范式转变
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Feb;43(1):21-32. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
6
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection as a transoral treatment for superficial pharyngeal cancer.经口内镜下黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术作为治疗浅层咽癌的一种经口治疗方法的临床疗效。
Head Neck. 2013 Sep;35(9):1248-54. doi: 10.1002/hed.23106. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
7
Risk factors for incomplete resection with pharyngeal endoscopic submucosal dissection and long-term prognosis after resection.咽内镜黏膜下剥离术不完全切除的危险因素及切除后的长期预后。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3593-3601. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09820-8. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
8
Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of superficial pharyngeal carcinomas.内镜下黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术整块切除浅层咽部癌。
Endoscopy. 2012 Jun;44(6):556-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309720. Epub 2012 May 25.
9
Endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for superficial laryngo-pharyngeal cancer.内镜下咽-喉手术治疗下咽-喉浅表癌
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):323-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4213-y. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
10
Endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery for hypopharyngeal lesions.经内镜下咽-喉手术治疗下咽病变。
Oral Oncol. 2020 Jul;106:104655. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104655. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analyses of short- and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for superficial pharyngeal carcinomas.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与内镜下咽-喉手术治疗浅表性咽癌的短期和长期疗效比较分析。
DEN Open. 2024 Sep 12;5(1):e70003. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70003. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Significance of rescue hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection in difficult colorectal cases.挽救性杂交内镜黏膜下剥离术在复杂结直肠病例中的意义
Clin Endosc. 2023 Nov;56(6):778-789. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.268. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
Endoscopy under general anesthesia for detecting synchronous lesions of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
全身麻醉下的内镜检查用于检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌的同步病变。
Clin Endosc. 2023 May;56(3):308-309. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.069. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
Endoscopic Laryngopharyngeal Surgery Combined with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as a Treatment Option for Superficial Hypopharyngeal Cancer with Suspected Synchronous Lymph Node Metastasis.内镜下咽手术联合内镜黏膜下剥离术作为疑似同步淋巴结转移的浅表性下咽癌的一种治疗选择
Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 3;17(1):1-13. doi: 10.1159/000528424. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Efficacy of endoscopy under general anesthesia for the detection of synchronous lesions in oro-hypopharyngeal cancer.全身麻醉下内镜检查在口咽癌同步病变检测中的疗效
Clin Endosc. 2023 May;56(3):315-324. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.072. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
6
Prediction of depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis in superficial pharyngeal cancer by magnifying endoscopy using the Japan Esophageal Society classification.采用日本食管学会分类法的放大内镜对浅表型咽喉癌浸润深度及淋巴结转移的预测
DEN Open. 2022 Jul 12;3(1):e151. doi: 10.1002/deo2.151. eCollection 2023 Apr.