Rheumatology, HU Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, University of Cantabria, Santander.
Rheumatology Cátedra UAM-Roche (EPID-Future) HU La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, UAM, Madrid.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Dec 1;59(12):3906-3916. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa621.
To assess the efficacy of abatacept (ABA) in RA patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (RA-ILD).
This was an observational, multicentre study of RA-ILD patients treated with at least one dose of ABA. ILD was diagnosed by high-resolution CT (HRCT). We analysed the following variables at baseline (ABA initiation), 12 months and at the end of the follow-up: Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) scale (1-point change), forced vital capacity (FVC) or diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (improvement or worsening ≥10%), HRCT, DAS on 28 joints evaluated using the ESR (DAS28ESR) and CS-sparing effect.
We studied 263 RA-ILD patients [150 women/113 men; mean (s.d.) age 64.6 (10) years]. At baseline, they had a median duration of ILD of 1 (interquartile range 0.25-3.44) years, moderate or severe degree of dyspnoea (MMRC grade 2, 3 or 4) (40.3%), FVC (% of the predicted) mean (s.d.) 85.9 (21.8)%, DLCO (% of the predicted) 65.7 (18.3) and DAS28ESR 4.5 (1.5). The ILD patterns were: usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (40.3%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (31.9%) and others (27.8%). ABA was prescribed at standard dose, i.v. (25.5%) or s.c. (74.5%). After a median follow-up of 12 (6-36) months the following variables did not show worsening: dyspnoea (MMRC) (91.9%); FVC (87.7%); DLCO (90.6%); and chest HRCT (76.6%). A significant improvement of DAS28ESR from 4.5 (1.5) to 3.1 (1.3) at the end of follow-up (P < 0.001) and a CS-sparing effect from a median 7.5 (5-10) to 5 (2.5-7.5) mg/day at the end of follow-up (P < 0.001) was also observed. ABA was withdrawn in 62 (23.6%) patients due to adverse events (n = 30), articular inefficacy (n = 27), ILD worsening (n = 3) and other causes (n = 2).
ABA may be an effective and safe treatment for patients with RA-ILD.
评估阿巴西普(ABA)在患有间质性肺疾病(ILD)的类风湿关节炎(RA-ILD)患者中的疗效。
这是一项针对至少接受过一次 ABA 治疗的 RA-ILD 患者的观察性、多中心研究。ILD 通过高分辨率 CT(HRCT)诊断。我们在基线(ABA 起始时)、12 个月和随访结束时分析了以下变量:改良医学研究委员会(MMRC)量表(1 分变化)、用力肺活量(FVC)或一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)(改善或恶化≥10%)、HRCT、28 关节 DAS 使用 ESR(DAS28ESR)和 CS 节约效应评估。
我们研究了 263 名 RA-ILD 患者[150 名女性/113 名男性;平均(标准差)年龄 64.6(10)岁]。基线时,ILD 中位持续时间为 1(四分位距 0.25-3.44)年,呼吸困难程度为中度或重度(MMRC 2、3 或 4 级)(40.3%),FVC(预测值的%)平均(标准差)85.9(21.8)%,DLCO(预测值的%)65.7(18.3)%和 DAS28ESR 4.5(1.5)%。ILD 模式为:普通间质性肺炎(UIP)(40.3%)、非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)(31.9%)和其他(27.8%)。ABA 以标准剂量静脉内(25.5%)或皮下(74.5%)给药。中位随访 12(6-36)个月后,以下变量无恶化:呼吸困难(MMRC)(91.9%);FVC(87.7%);DLCO(90.6%);和胸部 HRCT(76.6%)。DAS28ESR 从随访结束时的 4.5(1.5)显著改善至 3.1(1.3)(P<0.001),CS 节约效应从中位 7.5(5-10)mg/天改善至随访结束时的 5(2.5-7.5)mg/天(P<0.001)。ABA 因不良事件(n=30)、关节无效(n=27)、ILD 恶化(n=3)和其他原因(n=2)而在 62 名(23.6%)患者中停药。
ABA 可能是治疗 RA-ILD 患者的一种有效且安全的治疗方法。