Sharma Mayur, Dietz Nicholas, John Kevin, Aljuboori Zaid, Wang Dengzhi, Ugiliweneza Beatrice, Boakye Maxwell, Drazin Doniel
Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, Washington, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:e305-e319. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.048. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
To identify the impact of different surgical approaches for lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) on complications, reoperations/readmissions, and health care utilization.
We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan. Patients were divided into 6 groups: single-level anterior only (sA), single-level anterior + posterior (sAP), single-level posterior (sP), multilevel anterior (mA), multilevel anterior + posterior (mAP), and multilevel posterior only (mP). Outcomes of interest were cumulative complication rates, reoperation rates, readmission, and health care utilization at 6, 12, and 24 months.
Of 148,499 patients, 3% had sA fusion and 54% had mP procedures. Patients in the mAP cohort incurred higher cumulative complication rates (21%) compared with sA (13%), sAP (15%), sP (14%), mA (18%), and mP (18%). Emergency room admissions within 30 days were highest in the mA cohort (14%) followed by mAP (11%) and mP (8%). At 12 and 24 months, patients with mA procedures were most likely to have either new fusion or refusion (8% and 12%) followed by sA (7% and 10%), sAP (4% and 7%), mAP (4% and 8%) mP (4% and 7%), and sP (3% and 7%). Compared with the mP cohort, patients in the mA cohort incurred 1.2 times the overall median payments, whereas mAP and sA incurred 1.1 times the payments at 12 months. This difference was further reduced at 24 months.
mAP procedures are associated with higher cumulative complications and health care utilization compared with other procedures and the difference in health care utilization tends to decrease over 12 and 24 months.
确定腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病(DDD)不同手术方式对并发症、再次手术/再入院率及医疗资源利用的影响。
我们使用国际疾病分类第九版和第十版以及当前手术操作术语代码从MarketScan中提取数据。患者被分为6组:仅单节段前路手术(sA)、单节段前路+后路手术(sAP)、单节段后路手术(sP)、多节段前路手术(mA)、多节段前路+后路手术(mAP)以及仅多节段后路手术(mP)。关注的结果指标为6个月、12个月和24个月时的累积并发症发生率、再次手术率、再入院率及医疗资源利用情况。
在148,499例患者中,3%接受了sA融合手术,54%接受了mP手术。mAP队列患者的累积并发症发生率(21%)高于sA(13%)、sAP(15%)、sP(14%)、mA(18%)和mP(18%)。30天内急诊入院率在mA队列中最高(14%),其次是mAP(11%)和mP(8%)。在12个月和24个月时,接受mA手术的患者最有可能进行新的融合或再次融合(8%和12%),其次是sA(7%和10%)、sAP(4%和7%)、mAP(4%和8%)、mP(4%和7%)以及sP(3%和7%)。与mP队列相比,mA队列患者的总体中位费用是其1.2倍,而mAP和sA在12个月时的费用是其1.1倍。这种差异在24个月时进一步缩小。
与其他手术方式相比,mAP手术与更高的累积并发症及医疗资源利用相关,且医疗资源利用方面的差异在12个月和24个月期间趋于减小。