基于电报的虚拟教育与面对面教育对中重度哮喘青少年生活质量的有效性：一项试点随机对照试验。
The effectiveness of telegram-based virtual education versus in-person education on the quality of life in adolescents with moderate-to-severe asthma: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
作者信息
Faraji Shiva, Valizadeh Sousan, Sharifi Akbar, Shabazi Shahla, Ghojazadeh Morteza
机构信息
Department of Pediatric Nursing School of Nursing and Midwifery Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran.
Iranian Center for Evidence-Based Practice, Nursing and Midwifery School Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran.
出版信息
Nurs Open. 2020 Jun 28;7(6):1691-1697. doi: 10.1002/nop2.552. eCollection 2020 Nov.
AIM
In recent years, mobile applications have been developed for health education purposes. The aim of this study was to determine whether Telegram-based virtual education versus in-person education can be effective for improving the quality of life in adolescents with moderate-to-severe asthma.
DESIGN
A single-blind randomized trial.
METHODS
Participants were 64 adolescents aged 12-19 years and were equally assigned randomly to group A (Telegram-based education) and group B (in-person education) during 22 June 2017-19 February 2018. The educational contents were similar for both groups. The Mini Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire was used prior to intervention and 5 weeks postintervention for both groups of adolescents.
RESULTS
A statistically significant increase was observed in the quality of life in both groups (< .001). After controlling the quality-of-life scores, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the mean score for the quality of life and its domains (< .05).
目的
近年来，已开发出用于健康教育目的的移动应用程序。本研究的目的是确定基于Telegram的虚拟教育与面对面教育相比，是否能有效改善中重度哮喘青少年的生活质量。
设计
单盲随机试验。
方法
参与者为64名12 - 19岁的青少年，在2017年6月22日至2018年2月19日期间被随机平均分配到A组（基于Telegram的教育）和B组（面对面教育）。两组的教育内容相似。两组青少年在干预前和干预后5周均使用了《小儿哮喘生活质量迷你问卷》。
结果
两组的生活质量均有统计学上的显著提高（<0.001）。在控制生活质量得分后，两组在生活质量及其领域的平均得分方面没有统计学上的显著差异（<0.05）。
Zotero 插件