Faculty of Medicine Institute of Health and Society Oslo University Oslo Norway.
Lovisenberg Diaconal University College Oslo Norway.
Nurs Open. 2020 Jul 23;7(6):1787-1797. doi: 10.1002/nop2.565. eCollection 2020 Nov.
To evaluate the effects of a person-centred and thriving-promoting intervention in nursing homes on staff job satisfaction, stress of conscience and the person-centredness of care and of the environment.
A multi-centre, non-equivalent control group, before-after trial design.
Staff ( = 341) from six nursing homes in Australia, Norway and Sweden were assigned to the intervention or the control group and both groups were evaluated before the intervention, immediately after and by 6 months follow-up. Staff completed a questionnaire about job satisfaction (primary endpoint), stress of conscience and the person-centredness of care and of the environment (secondary endpoints). Linear regression models were used to identify the mean scores and to analyse group differences to test the effects of the intervention.
The intervention had no statistically significant effects on staff job satisfaction, level of stress of conscience or the perceived person-centredness of care and of the environment.
评估以人为主导和促进繁荣的干预措施对养老院工作人员工作满意度、良心压力以及以人为主导的护理和环境的影响。
多中心、非等效对照组、前后测设计。
来自澳大利亚、挪威和瑞典的 6 家养老院的工作人员(n=341)被分配到干预组或对照组,两组在干预前、干预后即刻和 6 个月随访时进行评估。工作人员完成了一份关于工作满意度(主要终点)、良心压力以及以人为主导的护理和环境的调查问卷(次要终点)。线性回归模型用于确定平均分数,并分析组间差异以检验干预的效果。
干预措施对工作人员的工作满意度、良心压力水平或感知的以人为主导的护理和环境的人性化程度没有统计学上的显著影响。