• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多种呼吸道标本中新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)检测的阳性率及一致性

The Yield and Consistency of the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Multiple Respiratory Specimens.

作者信息

Zhang Haixia, Chen Meiling, Zhang Yanhua, Wen Jing, Wang Yajie, Wang Liming, Guo Jinjin, Liu Chen, Li Daijing, Wang Ying, Bai Jing, Gao Guiju, Wang Sa, Yang Di, Yu Fengting, Yan Liting, Wan Gang, Zhang Fujie

机构信息

The Nursing Department, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

The Medical Statistic Department, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 26;7(10):ofaa379. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa379. eCollection 2020 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaa379
PMID:33072810
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7499703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the yield of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays in nasopharyngeal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, and sputum for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study in Beijing Ditan Hospital, China. Specimens including nasopharyngeal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, and sputum from confirmed coronavirus 2019 patients were collected for RT-PCR testing. Disease duration was calculated from the date of symptom onset to the date of specimen collection and divided into 3 groups: ≤14 days, 14-21 days, and >21 days. We compared positive rates across the 3 specimens collected. The kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the consistency of RT-PCR results between different specimens.

RESULTS

A total of 291 specimens were collected and tested from 43 confirmed patients. Among specimens collected with a disease duration of ≤14 days, the positive rate was highest in sputum (79.2%); this rate was significantly higher than that in nasopharyngeal swabs (37.5%; = .003) and oropharyngeal swabs (20.8%; < .001). Similar findings were observed with the disease durations of 14-21 days and >21 days. The consistency of testing results between nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs was low with the disease durations of ≤14 days and >21 days. The consistency between the sputum and oropharyngeal swabs and between the sputum and nasopharyngeal swabs was very low across all 3 disease durations, with statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs, sputum had the highest yield of SARS-CoV-2 detection. Nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs had a similar yield. If sputum is not feasible, a nasopharyngeal swab can be recommended for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, and early testing is needed.

摘要

背景

很少有研究比较鼻咽拭子、口咽拭子和痰液中逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的阳性率。

方法

我们在中国北京地坛医院进行了一项观察性研究。收集确诊的2019冠状病毒病患者的鼻咽拭子、口咽拭子和痰液等标本进行RT-PCR检测。从症状出现日期到标本采集日期计算病程,并分为3组:≤14天、14-21天和>21天。我们比较了采集的3种标本的阳性率。kappa系数用于评估不同标本之间RT-PCR结果的一致性。

结果

共收集并检测了43例确诊患者的291份标本。在病程≤14天采集的标本中,痰液的阳性率最高(79.2%);该率显著高于鼻咽拭子(37.5%;P = .003)和口咽拭子(20.8%;P < .001)。在病程为14-21天和>21天时也观察到类似结果。在病程≤14天和>21天时,鼻咽拭子和口咽拭子检测结果的一致性较低。在所有3个病程中,痰液与口咽拭子以及痰液与鼻咽拭子之间的一致性都非常低,具有统计学意义。

结论

与鼻咽拭子和口咽拭子相比,痰液检测SARS-CoV-2的阳性率最高。鼻咽拭子和口咽拭子的阳性率相似。如果无法获取痰液,可推荐使用鼻咽拭子检测SARS-CoV-2,且需要尽早检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b06/7550647/bb8d653ad842/ofaa379_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b06/7550647/bb8d653ad842/ofaa379_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b06/7550647/bb8d653ad842/ofaa379_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Yield and Consistency of the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Multiple Respiratory Specimens.多种呼吸道标本中新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)检测的阳性率及一致性
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 26;7(10):ofaa379. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa379. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Comparison of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in 353 patients received tests with both specimens simultaneously.比较 353 例同时接受两种标本检测的患者的鼻咽拭子和口咽拭子在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的应用。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:107-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
3
Comparable detection of nasopharyngeal swabs and induced sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection of suspected novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) patients in Fayoum governorate, Egypt.埃及法尤姆省疑似新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)患者病毒核酸检测中鼻咽拭子与诱导痰标本的可比检测
Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2023;12(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s43088-023-00379-4. Epub 2023 May 2.
4
Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients.检测和分析 COVID-19 患者各种生物样本中的核酸。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Sep-Oct;37:101673. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101673. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
5
Accuracy of Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction in COVID-19 Patients.实时聚合酶链反应在 COVID-19 患者中的准确性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0059121. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00591-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.拭子类型和采集时间对 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-COV-2 的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Buccal swabs as non-invasive specimens for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2.颊拭子作为非侵入性标本用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型。
J Int Med Res. 2021 May;49(5):3000605211016996. doi: 10.1177/03000605211016996.
8
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Reliability of induced sputum test is greater than that of throat swab test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: A multi-center cross-sectional study.诱导痰检测的可靠性大于咽拭子检测,可用于检测 COVID-19 患者的 SARS-CoV-2:一项多中心横断面研究。
Virulence. 2020 Dec;11(1):1394-1401. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1831342.
10
Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.比较日本 COVID-19 患者鼻咽拭子和唾液标本用于 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 分子检测的效果。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jan;27(1):126-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening and confirmation tests for SARS-CoV-2: benefits and drawbacks.新型冠状病毒2019(SARS-CoV-2)的筛查和确认试验:益处与弊端
Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2023;12(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s43088-023-00342-3. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
Performance & clinical utility of oropharyngeal versus nasopharyngeal swabs in COVID-19.口咽拭子与鼻咽拭子在 COVID-19 中的性能和临床应用。
Indian J Med Res. 2022 Sep;156(3):478-483. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2275_21.
3
Comparative analysis of various clinical specimens in detection of SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR in new and follow up cases of COVID-19 infection: Quest for the best choice.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Shedding Duration in Sputum and Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens Among Adult Inpatients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒肺炎成年住院患者痰液与鼻咽拭子标本中 2019 年冠状病毒脱落持续时间的差异。
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1876-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Adverse effects of nasopharyngeal swabs: Three-dimensional printed versus commercial swabs.鼻咽拭子的不良反应:三维打印拭子与商用拭子的比较
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 May;42(5):641-642. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.297. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Saliva sample as a non-invasive specimen for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study.
比较分析新冠病毒感染新发病例和随访病例中使用 rRT-PCR 检测时各种临床标本:探索最佳选择。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249408. eCollection 2021.
4
COVID-19 Pandemic: Review of Contemporary and Forthcoming Detection Tools.COVID-19大流行:当代及未来检测工具综述
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Mar 17;14:1049-1082. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S289629. eCollection 2021.
唾液样本作为 2019 年冠状病毒病诊断的非侵入性标本:一项横断面研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):285.e1-285.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 15.
4
What dentists need to know about COVID-19.牙医需要了解的 COVID-19 知识。
Oral Oncol. 2020 Jun;105:104741. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104741. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Clinical and virologic characteristics of the first 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States.美国首批 12 例 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的临床和病毒学特征。
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):861-868. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0877-5. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
6
Comparison of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in 353 patients received tests with both specimens simultaneously.比较 353 例同时接受两种标本检测的患者的鼻咽拭子和口咽拭子在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的应用。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:107-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
7
How to Obtain a Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimen.如何获取鼻咽拭子样本。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):e76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm2010260. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
Comparison of throat swabs and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 52 cases of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19).比较 52 例新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染性肺炎(COVID-19)患者的咽拭子和痰标本用于病毒核酸检测。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1089-1094. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0187.
9
Clinical Course and Outcomes of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: a Preliminary Report of the First 28 Patients from the Korean Cohort Study on COVID-19.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 感染患者的临床病程和转归:来自韩国 COVID-19 队列研究的前 28 例患者的初步报告。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;35(13):e142. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e142.
10
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.住院 COVID-19 患者的病毒学评估。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. Epub 2020 Apr 1.