• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 52 例新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染性肺炎(COVID-19)患者的咽拭子和痰标本用于病毒核酸检测。

Comparison of throat swabs and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 52 cases of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19).

机构信息

Department of Blood Transfusion, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, P.R. China.

Department of Medical Laboratory, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P.R. China.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1089-1094. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0187.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2020-0187
PMID:32301745
Abstract

Objectives In December 2019, a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, China. Laboratory-based diagnostic tests utilized real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on throat samples. This study evaluated the diagnostic value to analyzing throat and sputum samples in order to improve accuracy and detection efficiency. Methods Paired specimens of throat swabs and sputum were obtained from 54 cases, and RNA was extracted and tested for 2019-nCoV (equated with SARS-CoV-2) by the RT-PCR assay. Results The positive rates of 2019-nCoV from sputum specimens and throat swabs were 76.9% and 44.2%, respectively. Sputum specimens showed a significantly higher positive rate than throat swabs in detecting viral nucleic acid using the RT-PCR assay (p = 0.001). Conclusions The detection rates of 2019-nCoV from sputum specimens were significantly higher than those from throat swabs. We suggest that sputum would benefit for the detection of 2019-nCoV in patients who produce sputum. The results can facilitate the selection of specimens and increase the accuracy of diagnosis.

摘要

目的

2019 年 12 月,中国武汉发生了新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染的肺炎(COVID-19)。基于实验室的诊断检测利用实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)对咽喉样本进行检测。本研究旨在评估分析咽喉和痰液样本的诊断价值,以提高检测的准确性和效率。

方法

收集了 54 例患者的咽拭子和痰液配对样本,提取 RNA,通过 RT-PCR 检测 2019-nCoV(等同于 SARS-CoV-2)。

结果

痰液标本和咽拭子标本中 2019-nCoV 的阳性率分别为 76.9%和 44.2%。与 RT-PCR 检测病毒核酸相比,痰液标本的阳性率明显高于咽拭子(p=0.001)。

结论

痰液标本中 2019-nCoV 的检出率明显高于咽拭子。建议对于产生痰液的患者,痰液有利于检测 2019-nCoV。研究结果有助于选择标本,提高诊断的准确性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of throat swabs and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 52 cases of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19).比较 52 例新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染性肺炎(COVID-19)患者的咽拭子和痰标本用于病毒核酸检测。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1089-1094. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0187.
2
Reliability of induced sputum test is greater than that of throat swab test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: A multi-center cross-sectional study.诱导痰检测的可靠性大于咽拭子检测,可用于检测 COVID-19 患者的 SARS-CoV-2:一项多中心横断面研究。
Virulence. 2020 Dec;11(1):1394-1401. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1831342.
3
Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients.检测和分析 COVID-19 患者各种生物样本中的核酸。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Sep-Oct;37:101673. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101673. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
4
Prospective Study Comparing Deep Throat Saliva With Other Respiratory Tract Specimens in the Diagnosis of Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019.前瞻性研究比较深喉唾液与其他呼吸道标本在新型冠状病毒病 2019 诊断中的应用。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 13;222(10):1612-1619. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa487.
5
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.拭子类型和采集时间对 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-COV-2 的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
Viral loads in throat and anal swabs in children infected with SARS-CoV-2.儿童感染 SARS-CoV-2 后咽喉和肛门拭子中的病毒载量。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1233-1237. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1771219.
7
Temporal Change of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Specimens of COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients.SARS-CoV-2 在 COVID-19 肺炎患者临床标本中的时间变化。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Sep;103(3):1204-1206. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0551.
8
Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients.新冠康复患者体内病毒 RNA 的持续存在与清除。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 May 5;133(9):1039-1043. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000774.
9
Dynamic profile of RT-PCR findings from 301 COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study.中国武汉 301 例 COVID-19 患者的实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测结果动态特征:一项描述性研究。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jun;127:104346. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104346. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
10
Comparison of Two Commercial Molecular Tests and a Laboratory-Developed Modification of the CDC 2019-nCoV Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.两种商业分子检测方法与一种实验室开发的对疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)2019新型冠状病毒逆转录聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测法的改良方法用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00938-20.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
2
COVID-19: An overview on possible transmission ways, sampling matrices and diagnosis.新型冠状病毒肺炎:关于可能的传播途径、采样基质和诊断的概述
Bioimpacts. 2024;14(6):29968. doi: 10.34172/bi.2024.29968. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
A Comparative Analysis of Molecular Biological Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Testing the In Vitro Infectivity of the Virus.
用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)及测试该病毒体外感染性的分子生物学方法的比较分析
Microorganisms. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):180. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12010180.
4
Molecular Diagnosis of COVID-19; Biosafety and Pre-analytical Recommendations.新型冠状病毒肺炎的分子诊断;生物安全与分析前建议
Iran J Pathol. 2023 Summer;18(3):244-256. doi: 10.30699/IJP.2023.1988405.3061. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
5
Comparable detection of nasopharyngeal swabs and induced sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection of suspected novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) patients in Fayoum governorate, Egypt.埃及法尤姆省疑似新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)患者病毒核酸检测中鼻咽拭子与诱导痰标本的可比检测
Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2023;12(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s43088-023-00379-4. Epub 2023 May 2.
6
Next-generation nanophotonic-enabled biosensors for intelligent diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 variants.用于 SARS-CoV-2 变体智能诊断的新一代基于纳米光子学的生物传感器。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jul 1;880:163333. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163333. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
7
Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on obesity, internet addiction, and sleep quality in adolescents.2019 年冠状病毒病大流行对青少年肥胖、网络成瘾和睡眠质量的影响。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct;66:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2022.07.011. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
8
COVID-19: Main findings after a year and half of unease and the proper scientific progress (Review).新冠疫情:一年半的不安与科学进展后的主要发现(综述)
Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jun;23(6):424. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11350. Epub 2022 May 4.
9
SARS-CoV-2 saliva testing using RT-PCR: a systematic review.使用 RT-PCR 进行 SARS-CoV-2 唾液检测:系统评价。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;121:166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 May 13.
10
Changes in reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold values of SARS-CoV-2 with topical povidone iodine use: A single-arm open-label interventional study.使用局部聚维酮碘后新型冠状病毒逆转录聚合酶链反应循环阈值的变化:一项单臂开放标签干预性研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Feb;11(2):480-486. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_993_21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.