• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌切除术 30 余年的演变:临床表现、治疗方法和结局的变化。

Evolution of Esophagectomy for Cancer Over 30 Years: Changes in Presentation, Management and Outcomes.

机构信息

Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Hospitals, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;28(6):3011-3022. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09200-3. Epub 2020 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-020-09200-3
PMID:33073345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8119401/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer has seen a considerable change in management and outcomes over the last 30 years. Historically, the overall prognosis has been regarded as poor; however, the use of multimodal treatment and the integration of enhanced recovery pathways have improved short- and long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the changing trends in presentation, management, and outcomes for patients undergoing surgical treatment for esophageal cancer over 30 years from a single-center, high-volume unit in the UK.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer (adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma) between 1989 and 2018 from a single-center, high-volume unit were reviewed. Presentation method, management strategies, and outcomes were evaluated. Patients were grouped into successive 5-year cohorts for comparison and evaluation of changing trends.

RESULTS

Between 1989 and 2018, 1486 patients underwent esophagectomy for cancer. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-71) and 1105 (75%) patients were male. Adenocarcinoma constituted 1105 (75%) patients, and overall median survival was 29 months (IQR 15-68). Patient presentation changed, with epigastric discomfort now the most common presentation (70%). An improvement in mortality from 5 to 2% (p < 0.001) was seen over the time period, and overall survival improved from 22 to 56 months (p < 0.001); however, morbidity increased from 54 to 68% (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes have significantly improved over the 30-year study period. In addition, mortality and length of stay have improved despite an increase in complications. The reasons for this are multifactorial and include the use of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy, the introduction of an enhanced recovery pathway, and improved patient selection.

摘要

背景

在过去的 30 年中,食管癌的治疗和预后发生了重大变化。历史上,整体预后一直被认为较差;然而,多模式治疗的应用和强化康复途径的整合改善了短期和长期预后。

目的

本研究旨在评估英国一家高容量中心 30 多年来接受手术治疗食管癌患者的表现、治疗方法和结局的变化趋势。

患者和方法

回顾了 1989 年至 2018 年间在一家高容量中心连续接受食管癌(腺癌或鳞状细胞癌)切除术的患者数据。评估了患者的就诊方式、治疗策略和结局。患者被分为连续的 5 年队列进行比较和趋势评估。

结果

1989 年至 2018 年间,1486 例患者接受了食管癌切除术。中位年龄为 65 岁(四分位距 [IQR] 59-71),1105 例(75%)为男性。腺癌占 1105 例(75%),总体中位生存期为 29 个月(IQR 15-68)。患者就诊方式发生了变化,现在上腹痛是最常见的表现(70%)。在此期间,死亡率从 5%降至 2%(p<0.001),总生存率从 22 个月提高到 56 个月(p<0.001);然而,发病率从 54%增加到 68%(p=0.004)。

结论

在 30 年的研究期间,长期预后有了显著改善。此外,尽管并发症增加,但死亡率和住院时间都有所改善。原因是多方面的,包括围手术期化疗(放疗)的应用、强化康复途径的引入以及患者选择的改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f27/8119401/ec7c79106b7b/10434_2020_9200_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f27/8119401/91a077d1d715/10434_2020_9200_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f27/8119401/ec7c79106b7b/10434_2020_9200_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f27/8119401/91a077d1d715/10434_2020_9200_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f27/8119401/ec7c79106b7b/10434_2020_9200_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of Esophagectomy for Cancer Over 30 Years: Changes in Presentation, Management and Outcomes.食管癌切除术 30 余年的演变:临床表现、治疗方法和结局的变化。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;28(6):3011-3022. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09200-3. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
2
Evolution of gastrectomy for cancer over 30-years: Changes in presentation, management, and outcomes.胃癌手术 30 年演变:发病情况、处理方法和预后的变化。
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.040. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
3
The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.在高容量中心,微创食管切除术的实施并不影响短期结果。
Anticancer Res. 2013 May;33(5):2085-91.
4
An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌手术结果的审计
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):536-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
5
Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.体重指数对机器人辅助Ivor-Lewis食管切除术后手术结果的影响:对一家高容量三级医疗中心129例病例的回顾性分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12484.
6
[Salvage surgery in esophageal cancer : Feasibility in patients after definitive radiochemotherapy (> 50 Gy)].[食管癌挽救性手术:根治性放化疗(>50 Gy)后患者的可行性]
Chirurg. 2015 Oct;86(10):955-62. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2971-z.
7
Trends in management and prognosis for esophageal cancer surgery: twenty-five years of experience at a single institution.食管癌手术的管理与预后趋势:单一机构的25年经验
Arch Surg. 2009 Mar;144(3):247-54; discussion 254. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2008.574.
8
Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.手术入路对食管癌食管切除术围手术期和长期结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1892-1900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5881-6. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
9
[Have Multimodal and Perioperative Therapeutic Strategies Changed the Survival after Oncological Oesophageal Surgery in the Last Two Decades? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis over 23 Years].[在过去二十年中,多模式和围手术期治疗策略是否改变了肿瘤性食管癌手术后的生存率?一项超过23年的回顾性队列分析]
Zentralbl Chir. 2018 Apr;143(2):171-180. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119892. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
10
Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer.食管癌切除术后的治疗结果。
Ann Surg. 2002 Sep;236(3):376-84; discussion 384-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200209000-00014.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility, safety and preliminary effect of exercise prehabilitation in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing surgery: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group pilot and feasibility study.运动预康复对食管癌手术患者的可行性、安全性及初步疗效:一项开放标签、随机、平行组先导性和可行性研究
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Aug 2;17(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01276-2.
2
Experiences and Needs of Patients with Esophageal Cancer Receiving Esophagectomy: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study.接受食管癌切除术的患者的经历与需求:一项质性纵向研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 17;19:2055-2068. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S523765. eCollection 2025.
3
A Comparison of Established Diagnostic Criteria for Cachexia and Their Impacts on Prognostication in Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancer.
恶病质既定诊断标准的比较及其对食管癌和胃癌患者预后的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 28;17(3):448. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030448.
4
Esophagectomy Trends and Postoperative Outcomes at Private Equity-Acquired Health Centers.私募股权收购的健康中心的食管癌切除术趋势及术后结果
JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):296-302. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5920.
5
Long-Term Impact of Severe Postoperative Complications after Esophagectomy for Cancer: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.食管癌切除术后严重术后并发症的长期影响:个体患者数据荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 11;16(8):1468. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081468.
6
Effects of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation on patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单一模式或多模式术前康复对行食管胃交界癌手术患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Dec 7;32(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08229-w.
7
The prognostic impact of pre-treatment cachexia in resectional surgery for oesophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.术前恶病质对食管胃结合部癌切除术预后影响的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1703-1711. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad239.
8
Effect of Intrathoracic or Cervical Anastomosis After Esophagectomy on Quality of Life.食管癌术后胸内或颈部吻合对生活质量的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7434-7441. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13770-3. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
9
The Impact of Acute Systemic Inflammation Secondary to Oesophagectomy and Anastomotic Leak on Computed Tomography Body Composition Analyses.食管癌切除术后急性全身炎症及吻合口漏对计算机断层扫描身体成分分析的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 30;15(9):2577. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092577.
10
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemotherapy for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma; Which Is the Optimal Treatment Option?新辅助放化疗与化疗治疗胃食管交界腺癌;哪种是最佳治疗方案?
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;14(23):5856. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235856.