Suppr超能文献

自动化检测福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织切片在 21 基因复发评分检测中的表现。

Performance of Automated Dissection on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections for the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, 89667Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, 89667Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820960760. doi: 10.1177/1533033820960760.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the performance of MilliSect dissection and manual dissection. Twenty-five formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer tissue blocks were selected for comparison. Specific areas of interest (AOIs) in invasive carcinoma on tissue sections were transferred to dissection slides by manual macrodissection or the MilliSect instrument. The comparison criteria were 1) the time required for dissection; 2) RNA concentration and purity; 3) RNA quantity of 5 housekeeping genes (by RT-qPCR); and 4) ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67 and recurrence score (RS) values (by the 21-gene assay). Then, tumor-adjacent tissues, including fibrocollagenous and epithelial tissues, from the same selected tissue blocks of 8 of 25 patients were scraped using the mesodissection method, and their RS values were assessed to evaluate the influence of tumor-adjacent tissues on the target AOIs. Ultimately, 4 AOIs of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) from 1 tissue block of another 4 patients with lymph node (LN) metastases each, LN tissue and a mixture of IDC and LN tissue from the other tissue block of the same 4 patients were mesodissected to evaluate the influence of infiltrating lymphocyte levels on the RS values of AOIs. In our experience, the MilliSect instrument, which provides process management documentation, required more time than manual macrodissection (on average, approximately 9.1 min per sample versus 5.8 min per sample, respectively). The RNA yield and quality of the dissected tissues were comparable for the 2 methods. However, the tumor-adjacent tissues of the AOIs may influence the RS to some extent. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can dramatically increase RSs, far exceeding the influence of tumor-adjacent fibrocollagenous and epithelial tissues. In conclusion, MilliSect mesodissection is comparable to manual dissection. This mesodissection tool may facilitate AOI alignment and the dissection process for the 21-gene RS assay. Samples whose adjacent tissues are intermixed with TILs warrant special attention.

摘要

本研究旨在比较 MilliSect 解剖和手动解剖的性能。选择了 25 个福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)乳腺癌组织块进行比较。通过手动宏观解剖或 MilliSect 仪器将组织切片上的浸润性癌特定感兴趣区域(AOI)转移到解剖载玻片上。比较标准为 1)解剖所需的时间;2)RNA 浓度和纯度;3)5 个管家基因的 RNA 量(通过 RT-qPCR);以及 4)ER、PR、HER2、Ki-67 和复发评分(RS)值(通过 21 基因检测)。然后,使用中解剖方法刮取 25 名患者中的 8 名患者的同一选定组织块中的肿瘤相邻组织,包括纤维胶原和上皮组织,并评估其 RS 值,以评估肿瘤相邻组织对目标 AOI 的影响。最后,从另外 4 名有淋巴结(LN)转移的患者的 1 个组织块中的 4 个浸润性导管癌(IDC)的 4 个 AOI、LN 组织和 IDC 和 LN 组织的混合物从同一 4 名患者的另一个组织块中进行中解剖,以评估浸润性淋巴细胞水平对 AOI RS 值的影响。根据我们的经验,提供过程管理文件的 MilliSect 仪器比手动宏观解剖需要更多的时间(平均而言,分别为每个样本约 9.1 分钟和每个样本 5.8 分钟)。两种方法的解剖组织的 RNA 产量和质量相当。然而,AOI 的肿瘤相邻组织可能在某种程度上影响 RS。肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)可以极大地增加 RS,远远超过肿瘤相邻纤维胶原和上皮组织的影响。总之,MilliSect 中解剖与手动解剖相当。这种中解剖工具可能有助于 21 基因 RS 检测的 AOI 对准和解剖过程。相邻组织与 TIL 混合的样本需要特别注意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/7592317/024beb85bf3b/10.1177_1533033820960760-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验