Suppr超能文献

勘误:让发育性语言障碍患者及其父母/照料者参与研究优先级设定

Erratum: Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting.

出版信息

J Vis Exp. 2020 Oct 19(164). doi: 10.3791/6451.

Abstract

An erratum was issued for: Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting. The tables in the Representative Results section were updated. The tables in the Representative Results section were updated from: Participant (n=42) Topic Rating Identification Assessment/ diagnosis Bilingualism Lifelong impact Provision- primary Provision- secondary Provision- adults Intervention Working with others Raising awareness Technology 1 10 10 9 10 10 9 10 8 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 10 3 10 4 6 9 8 2 1 7 5 11 3 4 8 7 1 11 9 3 2 10 5 6 4 5 7 11 10 9 8 6 3 5 2 4 1 6 10 8 2 6 9 7 5 4 3 11 1 7 1 2 10 7 9 5 6 4 3 8 11 8 10 1 6 11 2 7 9 5 8 4 3 9 1 2 11 7 3 9 10 4 5 6 8 10 1 4 11 10 3 6 9 2 8 5 7 11 1 2 11 8 3 9 10 4 6 5 7 12 10 8 3 6 7 6 9 11 8 5 4 13 2 3 11 6 4 7 8 10 5 9 1 14 2 5 9 11 10 7 3 6 1 8 5 15 6 3 5 10 9 7 8 4 2 16 10 8 3 6 9 1 2 4 5 1 17 11 9 2 7 3 6 1 8 10 4 5 18 8 9 2 1 3 7 6 5 4 10 19 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 20 10 10 1 9 10 9 9 9 10 8 7 21 10 7 10 7 6 1 9 6 8 6 22 10 1 10 10 10 5 23 1 10 10 5 10 24 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 25 10 9 10 10 6 9 10 8 7 10 8 26 10 9 6 7 8 5 4 3 2 1 27 10 9 2 3 6 5 4 8 7 1 28 10 3 2 4 8 5 1 9 6 7 29 10 6 2 4 7 5 3 9 8 1 30 10 2 1 9 8 4 5 4 3 6 31 10 10 7 10 9 10 9 10 9 8 9 32 8 7 1 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 5 33 5 6 4 10 8 10 7 10 8 9 5 34 9 10 6 8 10 1 7 10 4 10 10 35 7 5 6 10 9 7 5 10 1 10 1 36 11 9 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 8 6 37 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 38 7 5 6 8 5 6 4 10 5 39 10 5 5 6 8 9 6 10 10 40 7 3 7 8 7 8 6 6 9 41 8 5 4 6 8 6 7 5 1 42 8 5 5 5 8 5 7 5 8 Corrector value 26 16 14 24 23 15 15 24 13 20 12 Table 3: Unadjusted and adjusted top ten research priorities lists. Table to show the top ten research priorities without adjustment (left column) and with adjustment (right column). * depict defined research areas which are not represented in the top ten of the other columns (i.e., where priorities were different). to: Participant (n=42) Topic Rating Identification Assessment/ diagnosis Bilingualism Lifelong impact Provision- primary Provision- secondary Provision- adults Intervention Working with others Raising awareness Technology 1 10 10 9 10 10 9 10 8 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 10 3 10 4 6 9 8 2 1 7 5 11 3 4 8 7 1 11 9 3 2 10 5 6 4 5 7 11 10 9 8 6 3 5 2 4 1 6 10 8 2 6 9 7 5 4 3 11 1 7 1 2 10 7 9 5 6 4 3 8 11 8 10 1 6 11 2 7 9 5 8 4 3 9 1 2 11 7 3 9 10 4 5 6 8 10 1 4 11 10 3 6 9 2 8 5 7 11 1 2 11 8 3 9 10 4 6 5 7 12 10 8 3 6 7 6 9 11 8 5 4 13 2 3 11 6 4 7 8 10 5 9 1 14 2 5 9 11 10 7 3 6 1 8 5 15 6 3 5 10 9 7 8 4 2 16 10 8 3 6 9 1 2 4 5 1 17 11 9 2 7 3 6 1 8 10 4 5 18 8 9 2 1 3 7 6 5 4 10 19 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 20 10 10 1 9 10 9 9 9 10 8 7 21 10 7 10 7 6 1 9 6 8 6 22 10 1 10 10 10 5 23 1 10 10 5 10 24 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 25 10 9 10 10 6 9 10 8 7 10 8 26 10 9 6 7 8 5 4 3 2 1 27 10 9 2 3 6 5 4 8 7 1 28 10 3 2 4 8 5 1 9 6 7 29 10 6 2 4 7 5 3 9 8 1 30 10 2 1 9 8 4 5 4 3 6 31 10 10 7 10 9 10 9 10 9 8 9 32 8 7 1 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 5 33 5 6 4 10 8 10 7 10 8 9 5 34 9 10 6 8 10 1 7 10 4 10 10 35 7 5 6 10 9 7 5 10 1 10 1 36 11 9 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 8 6 37 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 38 7 5 6 8 5 6 4 10 5 39 10 5 5 6 8 9 6 10 10 40 7 3 7 8 7 8 6 6 9 41 8 5 4 6 8 6 7 5 1 42 8 5 5 5 8 5 7 5 8 Corrector value 26 16 14 24 23 15 15 24 13 20 12 Table 1: Topic ratings from all iDLD/iDLDPC participants with corrector values. Corrector value = frequency of topic rated above 7 (identified as cut-off). Corrector values transform survey data to integrate iDLD/iDLDPC data. Ratings above cut-off are in bold-italic. Blank spaces indicate topics not discussed or rated by iDLD/iDLDPC. Research topic Survey score Topic Corrector Values Final score Specific characteristics of evidence-based DLD interventions which facilitate progress towards the goals of an individual with DLD 462 Intervention 486 24 Effective tools to assist accurate diagnosis of DLD in early years children with significant SLCN 418 Assessment/diagnosis 434 16 Implementation of SLT recommendations in the classroom by teaching staff: confidence levels, capacity, capability and levels of success 441 Working with others 454 13 Effective ways of teaching self-help strategies to children with DLD 414 Intervention 438 24 Effective interventions for improving receptive language in terms of intervention characteristics and mode of delivery 434 Intervention 458 24 Impact of including speech, language and communication needs (SLCN)/ developmental language disorder (DLD) in teacher training course curriculums on referral rates and level of support for children with DLD 409 Working with others Identification 448 13 26 Effectiveness of a face-to-face versus indirect approach to intervention for individuals with DLD 417 Provision- primary Provision- secondary Provision- adult 470 23 15 15 Outcomes for individuals with DLD across settings (e.g. language provision, mainstream school), in relation to curriculum access, language development and social skills 415 Lifelong impact Provision- primary Provision- secondary 477 24 23 15 Impact of SLT interventions for adolescents and adults with DLD, on wider functional outcomes (e.g. quality of life, access to the curriculum, social inclusion and mental health) 392 Lifelong impact Intervention 440 24 24 Impact of targeted vocabulary interventions for individuals with DLD on curriculum access 410 Intervention 434 24 Table 2: Top ten research topics from survey with unadjusted scores, with application of corrector values and adjusted scores. Each defined research area is assigned to one or more topic, and adjusted proportionately. The final column indicates final score which is used to identify top ten highest scoring research priorities Rank Unadjusted top ten research priorities (Correctors  not applied, survey data only) Adjusted top ten research priorities (Corrector values applied) 1 Specific characteristics of evidence-based DLD interventions which facilitate progress towards the goals of an individual with DLD  Outcomes for individuals with DLD across settings (e.g. language provision, mainstream school), in relation to curriculum access, language development and social skills  2 Effective tools to assist accurate diagnosis of DLD in early years children with significant SLCN* Specific characteristics of evidence-based DLD interventions which facilitate progress towards the goals of an individual with DLD 3 Implementation of SLT recommendations in the classroom by teaching staff: confidence levels, capacity, capability and levels of success  Effectiveness of a face-to-face versus indirect approach to intervention for individuals with DLD 4 Effective ways of teaching self-help strategies to children with DLD Effective interventions for improving receptive language in terms of intervention characteristics and mode of delivery  5 Effective interventions for improving receptive language in terms of intervention characteristics and mode of delivery (402) Impact of including speech, language and communication needs (SLCN)/ developmental language disorder (DLD) in teacher training course curriculums on referral rates and level of support for children with DLD  6 Impact of including speech, language and communication needs (SLCN)/ developmental language disorder (DLD) in teacher training course curriculums on referral rates and level of support for children with DLD  Impact of SLT interventions for adolescents and adults with DLD, on wider functional outcomes (e.g. quality of life, access to the curriculum, social inclusion and mental health)* 7 Effectiveness of a face-to-face versus indirect approach to intervention for individuals with DLD Implementation of SLT recommendations in the classroom by teaching staff: confidence levels, capacity, capability and levels of success  8 Outcomes for individuals with DLD across settings (e.g. language provision, mainstream school), in relation to curriculum access, language development and social skills Effective ways of teaching self-help strategies to children with DLD 9 Impact of SLT interventions for adolescents and adults with DLD, on wider functional outcomes (e.g. quality of life, access to the curriculum, social inclusion and mental health) Impact of targeted vocabulary interventions for individuals with DLD on curriculum access 10 Impact of targeted vocabulary interventions for individuals with DLD on curriculum access Impact of teacher training (on specific strategies/ language support) on academic attainment in adolescents with DLD in secondary schools Table 3: Unadjusted and adjusted top ten research priorities lists. Table to show the top ten research priorities without adjustment (left column) and with adjustment (right column). * depict defined research areas which are not represented in the top ten of the other columns (i.e., where priorities were different).

摘要

已发布以下勘误

《让发育性语言障碍患者及其父母/照料者参与研究重点设定》。“代表性结果”部分的表格已更新。“代表性结果”部分的表格更新如下:

|参与者(n = 42)|主题评分|

|----|----|

|识别|评估/诊断|双语|终身影响|初级服务|二级服务|成人服务|干预|与他人合作|提高认识|技术|

|1|10|10|9|10|10|9|10|8|

|2|10|10|10|10|10|10|5|10|

|3|10|4|6|9|8|2|1|7|

|4|5|11|3|4|8|7|1|11|

|5|9|3|2|10|5|6|4|5|

|6|7|11|10|9|8|6|3|5|

|7|2|4|1|6|10|8|2|6|

|8|9|7|5|4|3|11|1|7|

|9|1|2|10|7|9|5|6|4|

|10|3|8|11|8|10|1|6|11|

|11|2|7|9|5|8|4|3|9|

|12|1|2|11|7|3|9|10|4|

|13|5|6|8|10|1|4|11|10|

|14|(3)|6|9|2|8|5|7|11|

|15|1|2|11|8|3|9|10|4|

|16|6|5|7|12|10|8|3|6|

|17|7|6|9|11|8|5|4|13|

|18|2|3|11|6|4|7|8|10|

|19|5|9|11|10|7|3|6|1|

|20|8|5|1|17|11|9|2|7|

|21|3|6|1|8|10|4|5|18|

|22|8|9|2|1|3|7|6|5|

|23|4|10|9|8|7|6|5|4|

|24|3|2|1|20|10|10|1|9|

|25|10|9|10|7|6|1|9|6|

|26|8|6|22|1|10|10|10|5|

|27|1|10|10|5|10|24|10|10|

|28|10|10|10|10|10|10|9|25|

|29|10|9|10|10|6|9|10|8|

|30|7|10|8|26|10|9|6|7|

|31|8|5|4|3|2|1|27|10|

|32|9|3|2|4|8|5|1|9|

|33|6|2|4|7|5|3|9|8|

|34|1|10|2|1|9|8|4|5|

|35|4|3|6|31|10|10|7|10|

|36|9|10|6|8|10|1|7|10|

|37|4|10|10|35|7|5|6|10|

|38|9|5|5|6|8|9|6|10|

|39|10|7|3|7|8|7|8|6|

|40|6|6|9|41|8|5|4|6|

|41|8|5|5|5|8|5|7|5|

|42|8|5|5|5|8|5|7|5|

|校正值|26|16|14|24|23|15|15|24|13|20|12|

表3:未调整和调整后的十大研究重点列表。该表展示了未调整(左列)和调整后(右列)的十大研究重点。*表示在其他列的十大重点中未出现的特定研究领域(即重点不同的地方)。

更新后内容

|参与者(n = 42)|主题评分|

|----|----|

|识别|评估/诊断|双语|终身影响|初级服务|二级服务|成人服务|干预|与他人合作|提高认识|技术|

|1|10|10|9|10|10|9|10|8|

|2|10|10|10|10|10|10|5|10|

|3|10|4|6|9|8|2|1|7|

|4|5|11|3|4|8|7|1|11|

|5|9|3|2|10|5|6|4|5|

|6|7|11|10|9|8|6|3|5|

|7|2|4|1|6|10|8|2|6|

|8|9|7|5|4|3|11|1|7|

|9|1|2|10|7|9|5|6|4|

|10|3|8|11|8|10|1|6|11|

|11|2|7|9|5|8|4|3|9|

|12|1|2|11|7|3|9|10|4|

|13|5|6|8|10|1|4|11|10|

|14|(3)|6|9|2|8|5|7|11|

|15|1|2|11|8|3|9|10|4|

|16|6|5|7|12|10|8|3|6|

|17|7|6|9|11|8|5|4|13|

|18|2|3|11|6|4|7|8|10|

|19|5|9|11|10|7|3|6|1|

|20|8|5|1|17|11|9|2|7|

|21|3|6|1|8|10|4|5|18|

|22|8|9|2|1|3|7|6|5|

|23|4|10|9|8|7|6|5|4|

|24|3|2|1|20|10|10|1|9|

|25|10|9|10|7|6|1|9|6|

|26|8|6|22|1|10|10|10|5|

|27|1|10|10|(5)|10|24|10|10|

|28|10|10|10|10|10|10|9|25|

|29|10|9|10|10|6|9|10|8|

|30|7|10|8|26|10|9|6|7|

|31|8|5|4|3|2|1|27|10|

|32|9|3|2|4|8|5|1|9|

|33|6|2|4|7|5|(3)|9|8|

|34|1|10|2|1|9|8|4|5|

|35|4|3|6|31|10|10|7|10|

|36|9|10|6|8|10|1|7|10|

|37|4|10|10|35|7|5|6|10|

|38|9|5|5|6|8|9|6|10|

|39|10|7|3|7|8|7|8|6|

|40|6|6|9|41|8|5|4|6|

|41|8|5|5|5|8|5|7|5|

|42|8|5|5|5|8|5|7|5|

|校正值|26|16|14|24|23|15|15|24|13|20|12|

表1:所有发育性语言障碍患者/发育性语言障碍患者父母参与者的主题评分及校正值。校正值 = 主题评分高于7(设定为临界值)的频率。校正值用于转换调查数据以整合发育性语言障碍患者/发育性语言障碍患者父母的数据。高于临界值的评分用粗斜体表示。空白表示发育性语言障碍患者/发育性语言障碍患者父母未讨论或评分的主题。

|研究主题|调查得分|主题|校正值|最终得分|

|----|----|----|----|----|精准诊断发育性语言障碍的有效工具,助力有显著言语、语言和沟通需求的幼儿|462|干预|486|24|在课堂上由教师实施言语和语言治疗建议:信心水平、能力、成效和成功程度|441|与他人合作|454|13|向发育性语言障碍儿童教授自助策略的有效方法|414|干预|438|24|从干预特征和实施方式角度看,改善接受性语言的有效干预措施|434|干预|458|24|将言语、语言和沟通需求/发育性语言障碍纳入教师培训课程对转诊率和发育性语言障碍儿童支持水平的影响|409|与他人合作/识别|448|13/26|针对发育性语言障碍个体的面对面干预与间接干预方法的有效性|417|初级服务/二级服务/成人服务|470|23/15/15|发育性语言障碍个体在不同环境(如语言服务、主流学校)下,在课程参与、语言发展和社交技能方面的成果|415|终身影响/初级服务/二级服务|477|24/23/15|言语和语言治疗干预对发育性语言障碍青少年和成人更广泛功能结果(如生活质量、课程参与、社会融入和心理健康)的影响|392|终身影响/干预|440|24/24|针对发育性语言障碍个体的目标词汇干预对课程参与的影响|410|干预|434|24|

表2:未调整分数、应用校正值后的分数及调整后分数的调查十大研究主题。每个特定研究领域被分配到一个或多个主题,并按比例调整。最后一列表示用于确定十大得分最高研究重点的最终得分。

|排名|未调整的十大研究重点(未应用校正值,仅调查数据)|调整后的十大研究重点(应用校正值)|

|----|----|----|

|1|精准诊断发育性语言障碍的有效工具,助力有显著言语、语言和沟通需求的幼儿|发育性语言障碍个体在不同环境(如语言服务、主流学校)下,在课程参与、语言发展和社交技能方面的成果|

|2|从干预特征和实施方式角度看,改善接受性语言的有效干预措施|精准诊断发育性语言障碍的有效工具,助力有显著言语、语言和沟通需求的幼儿|

|3|在课堂上由教师实施言语和语言治疗建议:信心水平、能力、成效和成功程度|针对发育性语言障碍个体的面对面干预与间接干预方法的有效性|

|4|向发育性语言障碍儿童教授自助策略的有效方法|从干预特征和实施方式角度看,改善接受性语言的有效干预措施|

|5|将言语、语言和沟通需求/发育性语言障碍纳入教师培训课程对转诊率和发育性语言障碍儿童支持水平的影响|将言语、语言和沟通需求/发育性语言障碍纳入教师培训课程对转诊率和发育性语言障碍儿童支持水平的影响|

|6|针对发育性语言障碍个体的目标词汇干预对课程参与的影响|言语和语言治疗干预对发育性语言障碍青少年和成人更广泛功能结果(如生活质量、课程参与、社会融入和心理健康)的影响|

|7|针对发育性语言障碍个体的面对面干预与间接干预方法的有效性|在课堂上由教师实施言语和语言治疗建议:信心水平、能力、成效和成功程度|

|8|发育性语言障碍个体在不同环境(如语言服务、主流学校)下,在课程参与、语言发展和社交技能方面的成果|向发育性语言障碍儿童教授自助策略的有效方法|

|9|言语和语言治疗干预对发育性语言障碍青少年和成人更广泛功能结果(如生活质量、课程参与、社会融入和心理健康)的影响|针对发育性语言障碍个体的目标词汇干预对课程参与的影响|

|10|教师培训(针对特定策略/语言支持)对中学发育性语言障碍青少年学业成绩的影响|针对发育性语言障碍个体的目标词汇干预对课程参与的影响|

表3:未调整和调整后的十大研究重点列表。该表展示了未调整(左列)和调整后(右列)的十大研究重点。*表示在其他列的十大重点中未出现的特定研究领域(即重点不同的地方)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验