• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境规制与外国直接投资吸引力:文献的计量分析。

Environmental regulation and FDI attraction: a bibliometric analysis of the literature.

机构信息

Faculdade de Economia do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Faculdade de Economia do Porto, Universidade do Porto and CEF.UP., Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-464, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(7):8873-8888. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11091-6. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11091-6
PMID:33074432
Abstract

Although concerns about the environment have been raised by some governments and the public in general, literature has explored the possibility that Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) may flow from countries with strict environmental regulations to countries where the regulations are less stringent-the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH). In response to that tendency, some countries may implement less stringent regulations, in order to attract FDI, resulting in the race to the bottom effect (RTB). As the number of studies on this topic has expanded dramatically in the last two decades, the present work intends to provide an updated literature review on the relationship between FDI and environmental regulations. Through a bibliometric analysis, we evaluate the relevance of existing studies and identify possible trends. Results show that there is considerable empirical evidence for the PHH, but fewer studies confirm the RTB, and that topic has been increasingly analysed.

摘要

尽管一些政府和公众已经对环境问题表示担忧,但文献已经探讨了外国直接投资(FDI)可能从环境法规严格的国家流向法规宽松的国家的可能性——污染避难所假说(PHH)。针对这种趋势,一些国家可能会实施较为宽松的法规,以吸引 FDI,从而导致了竞相降低环境标准的效应(RTB)。由于过去二十年来关于这一主题的研究数量急剧增加,本研究旨在对 FDI 与环境法规之间的关系提供最新的文献综述。通过文献计量分析,我们评估了现有研究的相关性,并确定了可能的趋势。结果表明,PHH 有相当多的经验证据,但确认 RTB 的研究较少,而且该主题的分析也在逐渐增加。

相似文献

1
Environmental regulation and FDI attraction: a bibliometric analysis of the literature.环境规制与外国直接投资吸引力:文献的计量分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(7):8873-8888. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11091-6. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
2
Do environmental regulations matter on Spanish foreign investment? A multisectorial approach.环境法规对西班牙对外投资有影响吗?多部门方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(41):57781-57797. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14635-6. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
Is there a trade-off between financing current account deficits and environmental deterioration in developing countries? An empirical investigation for the validity of the pollution haven hypothesis.发展中国家在弥补经常账户赤字和环境恶化之间是否存在权衡取舍?对污染避难所假说有效性的实证检验。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(37):56090-56097. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19819-2. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
4
Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO emissions for different European country groups: a panel ARDL approach.不同欧洲国家群体的外国直接投资、可再生能源和二氧化碳排放之间的相互关系:面板 ARDL 方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21495-21510. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05415-4. Epub 2019 May 24.
5
Moderating and mediating role of renewable energy consumption, FDI inflows, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from robust least square estimator.可再生能源消费、外国直接投资流入和经济增长对二氧化碳排放的调节和中介作用:稳健最小二乘估计的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2806-2819. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3837-6. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Does foreign direct investment limit trade-adjusted carbon emissions: fresh evidence from global data.外国直接投资是否会限制贸易调整后的碳排放:来自全球数据的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):37827-37841. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18088-9. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
7
How do foreign direct investment flows affect carbon emissions in BRICS countries? Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis using bilateral FDI flows from OECD to BRICS countries.外国直接投资流动如何影响金砖国家的碳排放?利用经合组织对金砖国家的双边外国直接投资流量重新审视污染避难所假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):14680-14692. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23185-4. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
Environmental impacts of FDI: evidence from heterogeneous panel methods.外国直接投资的环境影响:来自异质性面板方法的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(16):23639-23649. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17629-6. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
9
An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries.探讨 MINT 国家中的污染避难所和污染光环假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(22):23010-23026. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Effect of foreign direct investment on environmental quality in West Africa.外国直接投资对西非环境质量的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(20):57788-57800. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26545-w. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Research trends in the relationship between vitamin D and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 20-year bibliometric and visualization analysis.维生素 D 与 2 型糖尿病关系的研究趋势:20 年文献计量学和可视化分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 13;15:1421953. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1421953. eCollection 2024.
2
From foreign direct investment to environmental regulations: Does a feedback effect ever exist?从外国直接投资到环境法规:反馈效应是否存在?
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 31;10(8):e28657. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28657. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
3
The impact of FDI on energy conservation and emission reduction performance: A FDI quality perspective.
外商直接投资对节能减排绩效的影响:基于外商直接投资质量的视角
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 15;10(4):e25676. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25676. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
4
Impact of Environmental Regulation on Regional Innovative Ability: From the Perspective of Local Government Competition.环境规制对区域创新能力的影响:基于地方政府竞争的视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;20(1):418. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010418.
5
Revisiting the Relationship Between the Strength of Environmental Regulation and Foreign Direct Investment.重新审视环境规制强度与外国直接投资之间的关系
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:899918. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899918. eCollection 2022.