• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外国直接投资流动如何影响金砖国家的碳排放?利用经合组织对金砖国家的双边外国直接投资流量重新审视污染避难所假说。

How do foreign direct investment flows affect carbon emissions in BRICS countries? Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis using bilateral FDI flows from OECD to BRICS countries.

机构信息

Department of Banking and Financial Management, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece.

Business School, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, Lancashire, UK.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):14680-14692. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23185-4. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-23185-4
PMID:36163571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9908710/
Abstract

Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows from developed to developing countries may increase carbon emissions in developing countries as developing countries are seen as pollution havens due to their lenient environmental regulations. On the other hand, FDI flows from the developed world may improve management practices and advanced technologies in developing countries, and an increase in FDI flows reduces carbon emissions. Most of the existing studies examine the relationship between FDI flows and carbon emissions by using aggregate FDI flows; however, this paper contributes to the literature by analyzing the impact of FDI flows on carbon emissions in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) between 1993 and 2012 using bilateral FDI flows from eleven OECD countries. According to our empirical results, from which OECD country FDI flows to BRICS countries matters for carbon emissions in BRICS countries. Our results confirm that FDI flows to BRICS countries from Denmark and the UK increase carbon emissions in BRICS countries, confirming the pollution haven hypothesis. On the other hand, FDI that flows from France, Germany, and Italy reduced carbon emissions in the BRICS countries, confirming the pollution halo effect. FDI flows from Austria, Finland, Japan, Netherlands, Portugal, and Switzerland have no significant impact on carbon emissions in BRICS countries. The BRICS countries should promote clean FDI flows by reducing environmental damages, and investing countries should be rated based on their environmental damage in the host countries.

摘要

外国直接投资(FDI)从发达国家流向发展中国家可能会增加发展中国家的碳排放,因为发展中国家因其宽松的环境法规而被视为污染避难所。另一方面,FDI 从发达国家流入可能会改善发展中国家的管理实践和先进技术,而 FDI 流入的增加则会减少碳排放。大多数现有研究都是通过使用总 FDI 流量来检验 FDI 流量与碳排放之间的关系;然而,本文通过分析 1993 年至 2012 年间来自 11 个经合组织国家的双边 FDI 流量,对 FDI 流量对金砖国家(巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)碳排放的影响做出了贡献。根据我们的实证结果,从经合组织国家流入金砖国家的 FDI 流量对金砖国家的碳排放很重要。我们的结果证实,丹麦和英国向金砖国家的 FDI 流入增加了金砖国家的碳排放,证实了污染避难所假说。另一方面,法国、德国和意大利的 FDI 流入减少了金砖国家的碳排放,证实了污染光环效应。奥地利、芬兰、日本、荷兰、葡萄牙和瑞士的 FDI 流入对金砖国家的碳排放没有显著影响。金砖国家应通过减少环境损害来促进清洁 FDI 流动,投资国应根据其在东道国的环境损害进行评级。

相似文献

1
How do foreign direct investment flows affect carbon emissions in BRICS countries? Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis using bilateral FDI flows from OECD to BRICS countries.外国直接投资流动如何影响金砖国家的碳排放?利用经合组织对金砖国家的双边外国直接投资流量重新审视污染避难所假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):14680-14692. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23185-4. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
2
On the remittances-environment led hypothesis: Empirical evidence from BRICS economies.基于汇款-环境假说的实证研究:来自金砖国家经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(14):16460-16471. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07999-8. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
3
Relationship between inward FDI and environmental degradation for Pakistan: an exploration of pollution haven hypothesis through ARDL approach.巴基斯坦外国直接投资流入与环境恶化之间的关系:基于 ARDL 方法对污染避难所假说的探讨。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(13):15407-15425. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08083-x. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
Does the pollution halo hypothesis exist in this "better" world? The evidence from STIRPAT model.在这个“更美好”的世界中,污染晕轮假说是否存在?基于STIRPAT模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(58):87082-87096. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21654-4. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
The impact of hydro-biofuel-wind energy consumption on environmental cost of doing business in a panel of BRICS countries: evidence from three-stage least squares estimator.水—生物燃料—风能消费对金砖国家营商环境成本的影响:三阶段最小二乘法估计的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Feb;25(5):4479-4490. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0797-1. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
6
A sectoral analysis of the role of Foreign Direct Investment in pollution and energy transition in OECD countries.OECD 国家中外国直接投资在污染和能源转型中的作用的部门分析。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 15;302(Pt A):114018. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114018. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
7
Do foreign direct investment inflows affect environmental degradation in BRICS nations?外国直接投资流入会影响金砖国家的环境退化吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(1):690-701. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15678-5. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
8
The relationship between FDI, CO emissions, and energy consumption in Asia-Pacific economic cooperation countries.亚太经合组织成员国 FDI、CO 排放与能源消费的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):42845-42862. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17494-3. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
9
Effect of foreign direct investment on environmental quality in West Africa.外国直接投资对西非环境质量的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(20):57788-57800. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26545-w. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
10
Moderating and mediating role of renewable energy consumption, FDI inflows, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from robust least square estimator.可再生能源消费、外国直接投资流入和经济增长对二氧化碳排放的调节和中介作用:稳健最小二乘估计的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2806-2819. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3837-6. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Foreign investments and load capacity factor in BRICS: the moderating role of environmental policy stringency.金砖国家的外国投资与负荷因子:环境政策严格程度的调节作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11228-11242. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31814-9. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
2
Emerging trends of carbon emissions and foreign direct investment: accounting for ecological footprints, renewable energy, globalization, and technological innovations in BRICS.新兴的碳排放与外国直接投资趋势:在金砖五国中考虑生态足迹、可再生能源、全球化和技术创新因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jun;31(29):41586-41599. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31495-4. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
3
The Roles of Carbon Trading System and Sustainable Energy Strategies in Reducing Carbon Emissions-An Empirical Study in China with Panel Data.碳交易体系与可持续能源策略在减少碳排放中的作用——基于中国面板数据的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;20(8):5549. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085549.
4
Sustainable development goals perspective: nexus between Christians' religious tourism, geopolitical risk, and CO pollution in Italy.可持续发展目标视角:意大利基督徒宗教旅游、地缘政治风险与 CO 污染的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(22):62341-62354. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26463-x. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
5
Study on the Impact of Collaborative Agglomeration of Manufacturing and Producer Services on PM Pollution: Evidence from Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River in China.关于制造业与生产性服务业集聚协同效应对 PM 污染影响的研究——来自中国长江中游城市群的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 12;20(4):3216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043216.