• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水交换与二氧化碳充气对比右半结肠腺瘤漏检率:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Comparison of Right Colon Adenoma Miss Rates Between Water Exchange and Carbon Dioxide Insufflation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Evergreen General Hospital, Taoyuan.

Division of Gastroenterology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021;55(10):869-875. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001454.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001454
PMID:33074950
Abstract

GOALS

To test the hypothesis that water exchange (WE), when compared with carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation, significantly reduces the right colon adenoma miss rate (rAMR) in a blinded randomized controlled trial with cap-assisted colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND

The unblinded consecutive group observational data showed that WE significantly decreased rAMR. The unblinded data are limited by potential bias.

STUDY

Consecutive patients aged 45 years or more were randomized to undergo insertion with WE or CO2. Withdrawal and polypectomy were performed with CO2 in both groups to the hepatic flexure. The colonoscope was reinserted to the cecum. A second colonoscopist re-examined the right colon. The second colonoscopist was unaware, but made a guess, of the initial insertion method. The number of additional adenomas divided by the total number detected in both examinations equaled rAMR.

RESULTS

Among 262 patients (131/group), demographic variables were similar. The body mass index was significantly higher in the WE group. Compared with CO2, WE significantly decreased rAMR [18.0% (33/183) vs. 34.6% (62/179), P=0.0025] and right colon serrated polyp miss rate [17.4% (27/155) vs. 39.3% (33/84), P=0.002]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that WE was an independent predictor of rAMR (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.86), and so was ≥2 adenomas in the right colon (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-4.76). Whether the second colonoscopist guessed the insertion method correctly or not, and demographic and procedure variables were not associated with rAMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The randomized controlled trial validated unblinded observational data showing that WE significantly decreased rAMR and right colon serrated polyp miss rate (clinical trial registration number: NCT03845933).

摘要

目的

通过一项盲法随机对照试验,检验与二氧化碳(CO2)充气相比,水交换(WE)是否能显著降低盲法随机对照试验中右结肠腺瘤漏诊率(rAMR)的假说。

背景

非盲连续组观察数据显示 WE 显著降低了 rAMR。非盲数据受到潜在偏倚的限制。

研究

连续纳入年龄 45 岁及以上的患者,随机分为 WE 组或 CO2 组行插入操作。两组患者均在 CO2 充气下退镜至肝曲,然后重新插入结肠镜至盲肠。由第二位结肠镜医师对右半结肠进行再次检查。第二位结肠镜医师对初次插入方法不知情,但进行猜测。将两次检查中发现的额外腺瘤数除以两次检查发现的总腺瘤数,即得到 rAMR。

结果

262 例患者(每组 131 例)中,两组患者的人口统计学变量相似。WE 组的体重指数显著更高。与 CO2 相比,WE 显著降低了 rAMR[18.0%(33/183)比 34.6%(62/179),P=0.0025]和右半结肠锯齿状息肉漏诊率[17.4%(27/155)比 39.3%(33/84),P=0.002]。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,WE 是 rAMR 的独立预测因素(优势比,0.42;95%置信区间,0.21-0.86),右半结肠有≥2 个腺瘤也是 rAMR 的独立预测因素(优势比,2.35;95%置信区间,1.17-4.76)。无论第二位结肠镜医师是否猜对插入方法,以及人口统计学和手术变量均与 rAMR 无关。

结论

该随机对照试验验证了非盲观察性数据,表明 WE 显著降低了 rAMR 和右半结肠锯齿状息肉漏诊率(临床试验注册号:NCT03845933)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Right Colon Adenoma Miss Rates Between Water Exchange and Carbon Dioxide Insufflation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.水交换与二氧化碳充气对比右半结肠腺瘤漏检率:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021;55(10):869-875. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001454.
2
Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach.对比水下全结肠镜与标准 CO 检查的腺瘤和息肉遗漏率:使用串联结肠镜方法的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):591-598. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.046. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
3
Comparing right colon adenoma detection rate during water exchange and air insufflation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.比较水交换和注气过程中右半结肠腺瘤检出率:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jan;26(1):35-44. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02537-1. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
4
Water exchange for screening colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.用于筛查结肠镜检查的水交换可提高腺瘤检出率:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2017 May;49(5):456-467. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101229. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
5
Water exchange colonoscopy decreased adenoma miss rates compared with literature data and local data with CO insufflation: an observational study.水交换结肠镜检查与文献数据和局部 CO2 充气数据相比,降低了腺瘤漏诊率:一项观察性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1065-2.
6
A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.一种对腺瘤检测具有重大影响的新方法:联合水交换和帽辅助结肠镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
7
Insertion water exchange increases right colon adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection rates during withdrawal.插入式水交换可提高退镜过程中右半结肠腺瘤和增生性息肉的检出率。
Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jun;48(6):638-43. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
8
A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy.一项比较轻度镇静结肠镜检查期间空气膨肺、水浸和水交换的患者盲法随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1390-400. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.126. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
9
Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial.结肠镜退镜时动态改变患者体位可增加腺瘤检出率:一项随机交叉试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):456-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.046. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
10
Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.经内镜黏膜切除术与单纯内镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃固有肌层肿瘤的效果比较
Surg Endosc. 2020 Dec;34(12):5461-5468. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07342-4. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Water exchange technique improves colonoscopy in patients with spinal cord injury: Results of a matched cohort study.水交换技术改善脊髓损伤患者的结肠镜检查:一项匹配队列研究的结果
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Mar 18;12(3):E394-E401. doi: 10.1055/a-2251-3478. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Computer-Aided Detection False Positives in Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中的计算机辅助检测假阳性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 18;11(6):1113. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061113.