Clinical and economic impact of bacterial resistance: an approach to infection control and antimicrobial stewardship solutions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and economic burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and to provide an expert opinion on different approaches to fight it.

RECENT FINDINGS

For several decades now, it has been known that AMR among human pathogens is related to high clinical and economic burden.Different strategies have been implemented to control the clinical and economic burden of AMR. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASP), environmental cleaning and infection source control have been reported as the most effective interventions. There is a potential role for faecal microbiome transplant (FMT); however, long-term effectiveness and safety remain to be demonstrated. Another promising tool is to develop molecules to chelate or degrade residual antibiotics in the colon. Decolonization has demonstrated impact on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, but there is limited evidence on the clinical impact and effectiveness of decolonization in MDR Gram-negative carriers.

SUMMARY

A better assessment of AMR rates and the clinical and economic impact is needed. The epidemiology of AMR bacteria varies in different regions with MRSA, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenamase-producing Enterobacterales being the most worrying. ASP and infection control have been increasingly demonstrated to impact on AMR rates. New approaches such as FMT and decolonization have still to demonstrate efficacy and safety.