• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在调整幅度方案中不同浓度蔗糖的选择:强化物特定价值最大值的证据。

Choice between different concentrations of sucrose in an adjusting-magnitude schedule: Evidence for reinforcer-specific value maxima.

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2020 Dec;181:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104275. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104275
PMID:33075441
Abstract

According to the Multiplicative Hyperbolic Model (MHM), an extension of Mazur's (1987) model of delay discounting, the value of a reinforcer is an increasing hyperbolic function of its size (q). This experiment tested a prediction based on a revised version of MHM (MHM-R), according to which the maximum value may differ between different reinforcers, a possibility not envisaged in MHM. Rats were trained under a discrete-trials adjusting-magnitude schedule in which a response on lever B delivered a dilute sucrose reinforcer (0.2 M) of fixed volume, q, while a response on lever A delivered a more concentrated sucrose solution (0.4 M) the volume of which, q, was adjusted according to the rats' choices. When B was preferred in a given block of trials, q was increased in the following block; when A was preferred, q was reduced in the following block. q was varied across four phases of the experiment and the corresponding indifference magnitudes of A (q) were measured. In keeping with expectations based on both MHM and MHM-R, q increased approximately linearly with q, and 1/q with 1/q. The ratio q/q increased linearly with q with a positive intercept, a finding that is consistent with MHM-R but not with MHM.

摘要

根据多重双曲模型(MHM),这是马祖尔(1987)延迟折扣模型的扩展,强化物的价值是其大小(q)的递增双曲函数。本实验根据 MHM 的修订版(MHM-R)测试了一个预测,根据该预测,不同强化物之间的最大值可能不同,这是 MHM 中未设想的可能性。老鼠在离散试验调整幅度方案下接受训练,其中对杠杆 B 的反应会产生固定体积 q 的稀释蔗糖强化物(0.2 M),而对杠杆 A 的反应会产生更浓缩的蔗糖溶液(0.4 M),其体积 q 根据老鼠的选择进行调整。在给定的试验块中,当 B 被优先选择时,q 在下一个块中增加;当 A 被优先选择时,q 在接下来的块中减少。q 在实验的四个阶段中变化,测量相应的 A(q)的无差异量。与基于 MHM 和 MHM-R 的预期一致,q 与 q 大致呈线性关系,与 1/q 呈线性关系。q/q 与 q 呈线性关系,截距为正,这一发现与 MHM-R 一致,但与 MHM 不一致。

相似文献

1
Choice between different concentrations of sucrose in an adjusting-magnitude schedule: Evidence for reinforcer-specific value maxima.在调整幅度方案中不同浓度蔗糖的选择:强化物特定价值最大值的证据。
Behav Processes. 2020 Dec;181:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104275. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
Further observations on the reinforcing value of sucrose solutions: Interaction between quantity and concentration.关于蔗糖溶液强化价值的进一步观察:量与浓度之间的相互作用。
Behav Processes. 2023 Nov;213:104946. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104946. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Adulteration of sucrose with citric acid: Effect on reinforcing value, examined using an adjusting-magnitude schedule of reinforcement.柠檬酸对蔗糖的掺假:使用调整幅度强化计划检查其强化值的影响。
Behav Processes. 2022 Jan;194:104551. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104551. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
4
The effect of adulteration with a bitter tastant, denatonium benzoate, on the reinforcing value of sucrose.苯甲地那铵(一种苦味剂)对蔗糖强化值的影响。
Behav Processes. 2022 Nov;203:104771. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104771. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Effects of sucrose concentration on choice in an adjusting-magnitude schedule.蔗糖浓度对调整幅度程序中选择行为的影响。
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:562-569. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
6
Theoretical note: Quantity and concentration as co-determinants of the reinforcing value of sucrose: A re-analysis of some previously published data.理论说明:数量和浓度作为蔗糖强化值的共同决定因素:对一些先前发表数据的重新分析
Behav Processes. 2024 Feb;215:104990. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2024.104990. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
7
Some properties of an adjusting-magnitude schedule of reinforcement: Implications for models of choice.强化幅度调整程序表的一些特性:对选择模型的启示
Behav Processes. 2017 Jul;140:19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
8
Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.在调整延迟计划下的过渡和稳态选择行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jan;95(1):57-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-57.
9
Comparison of sucrose and maltose as reinforcers in an operant choice paradigm.蔗糖和麦芽糖作为操作性条件反射选择范式中的强化物的比较。
Behav Processes. 2024 Aug;220:105075. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105075. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
10
Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.鸽子和大鼠选择中的延迟量权衡:双曲线贴现与指数贴现
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Mar;91(2):197-211. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-197.