Suppr超能文献

系统诱导治疗对初始不可切除的局部进展期肝内和肝门周围胆管癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价。

Efficacy and safety of systemic induction therapy in initially unresectable locally advanced intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Dept. of Medical Oncology, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Amsterdam UMC, Dept. of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Dec;91:102110. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102110. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to international guidelines, induction therapy may be considered in selected patients with initially unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. The criteria for (un)resectability in cholangiocarcinoma varies between studies and no consensus-based agreement is available about these criteria. By performing a systematic literature review, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of systemic induction therapy in initially unresectable locally advanced perihilar (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and summarize resectability criteria used across studies.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane library to identify studies on systemic induction therapy in locally advanced pCCA and/or iCCA. The primary outcome was resection rate (RR) after induction therapy and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Ten studies with a total of 1167 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Among these patients, 334 (28.6%) were treated with systemic induction therapy. Across the studies, different types of chemotherapy regimens were administered (e.g., gemcitabine (based) chemotherapy and 5-FU (based) chemotherapy). Only six studies provided sufficient data and were used to analyze pooled (radical) resection rates. After induction therapy, 94 patients (39.2%) underwent a resection, of which R0 resections (22.9%). Pooled data on OS showed, better OS for chemotherapy plus resection versus chemotherapy only (pooled HR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.19-0.50; P value < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Adequately selected patients with locally advanced pCCA or iCCA may benefit from induction therapy followed by surgical resection. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.

摘要

背景

根据国际指南,对于最初不可切除的局部晚期胆管癌患者,可考虑采用诱导治疗。胆管癌的(可)切除标准在不同研究之间存在差异,目前尚无基于共识的统一标准。通过系统文献回顾,我们旨在调查全身诱导治疗对初始不可切除的局部晚期肝门部(pCCA)和肝内胆管癌(iCCA)的疗效和安全性,并总结研究中使用的可切除性标准。

方法

在 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行文献检索,以确定有关局部晚期 pCCA 和/或 iCCA 全身诱导治疗的研究。主要结局是诱导治疗后切除率(RR),次要结局是总生存期(OS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。

结果

共纳入了 10 项研究,总计 1167 例患者,符合纳入标准,并纳入本综述。这些患者中,有 334 例(28.6%)接受了全身诱导治疗。在这些研究中,使用了不同类型的化疗方案(如吉西他滨(基于)化疗和 5-FU(基于)化疗)。只有 6 项研究提供了足够的数据,用于分析汇总(根治性)切除率。诱导治疗后,94 例患者(39.2%)接受了手术切除,其中 R0 切除(22.9%)。汇总的 OS 数据显示,化疗加切除术与单纯化疗相比,OS 更好(汇总 HR=0.31,95%CI=0.19-0.50;P 值<0.0001)。

结论

对于局部晚期 pCCA 或 iCCA 的适当选择患者,可能受益于诱导治疗后行手术切除。需要进行前瞻性随机对照试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验