• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩散磁共振成像纤维束追踪滤波技术改变了结构连接组的拓扑结构。

Diffusion MRI tractography filtering techniques change the topology of structural connectomes.

作者信息

Frigo Matteo, Deslauriers-Gauthier Samuel, Parker Drew, Aziz Ould Ismail Abdol, John Kim Junghoon, Verma Ragini, Deriche Rachid

机构信息

Athena Project-Team, Inria Sophia Antipolis-Méditerranée, Université Côte D'Azur, Nice, France.

Penn Applied Connectomics and Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.

出版信息

J Neural Eng. 2020 Nov 11;17(6). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/abc29b.

DOI:10.1088/1741-2552/abc29b
PMID:33075758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8053736/
Abstract

The use of non-invasive techniques for the estimation of structural brain networks (i.e. connectomes) opened the door to large-scale investigations on the functioning and the architecture of the brain, unveiling the link between neurological disorders and topological changes of the brain network. This study aims at assessing if and how the topology of structural connectomes estimated non-invasively with diffusion MRI is affected by the employment of tractography filtering techniques in structural connectomic pipelines. Additionally, this work investigates the robustness of topological descriptors of filtered connectomes to the common practice of density-based thresholding.We investigate the changes in global efficiency, characteristic path length, modularity and clustering coefficient on filtered connectomes obtained with the spherical deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms and using the convex optimization modelling for microstructure informed tractography. The analysis is performed on both healthy subjects and patients affected by traumatic brain injury and with an assessment of the robustness of the computed graph-theoretical measures with respect to density-based thresholding of the connectome.Our results demonstrate that tractography filtering techniques change the topology of brain networks, and thus alter network metrics both in the pathological and the healthy cases. Moreover, the measures are shown to be robust to density-based thresholding.The present work highlights how the inclusion of tractography filtering techniques in connectomic pipelines requires extra caution as they systematically change the network topology both in healthy subjects and patients affected by traumatic brain injury. Finally, the practice of low-to-moderate density-based thresholding of the connectomes is confirmed to have negligible effects on the topological analysis.

摘要

使用非侵入性技术估计脑结构网络(即连接组)为大规模研究大脑功能和结构打开了大门,揭示了神经疾病与脑网络拓扑变化之间的联系。本研究旨在评估在结构连接组学流程中使用纤维束成像滤波技术时,通过扩散磁共振成像非侵入性估计的结构连接组拓扑是否以及如何受到影响。此外,这项工作还研究了滤波后连接组的拓扑描述符对基于密度阈值化这一常见做法的稳健性。我们研究了通过纤维束的球面反卷积信息滤波以及使用微观结构信息纤维束成像的凸优化建模获得的滤波后连接组的全局效率、特征路径长度、模块性和聚类系数的变化。分析在健康受试者和创伤性脑损伤患者中均进行,并评估了计算得到的图论测量相对于连接组基于密度阈值化的稳健性。我们的结果表明,纤维束成像滤波技术会改变脑网络的拓扑结构,从而在病理和健康情况下都会改变网络指标。此外,这些测量结果显示对基于密度的阈值化具有稳健性。本研究强调,在连接组学流程中纳入纤维束成像滤波技术需要格外谨慎,因为它们会系统性地改变健康受试者和创伤性脑损伤患者的网络拓扑结构。最后,证实对连接组进行低至中等密度的基于阈值化的做法对拓扑分析的影响可忽略不计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/0dfb74243da8/nihms-1657960-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/b38a34aaee84/nihms-1657960-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/745c376a9625/nihms-1657960-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/f04b3fbae170/nihms-1657960-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/2da74d61311b/nihms-1657960-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/2ca84224ddfa/nihms-1657960-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/0dfb74243da8/nihms-1657960-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/b38a34aaee84/nihms-1657960-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/745c376a9625/nihms-1657960-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/f04b3fbae170/nihms-1657960-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/2da74d61311b/nihms-1657960-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/2ca84224ddfa/nihms-1657960-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bef/8053736/0dfb74243da8/nihms-1657960-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Diffusion MRI tractography filtering techniques change the topology of structural connectomes.扩散磁共振成像纤维束追踪滤波技术改变了结构连接组的拓扑结构。
J Neural Eng. 2020 Nov 11;17(6). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/abc29b.
2
Correction for diffusion MRI fibre tracking biases: The consequences for structural connectomic metrics.弥散磁共振成像纤维追踪偏差的校正:对结构连接组学指标的影响。
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:150-162. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.047. Epub 2016 May 20.
3
Connectomes from streamlines tractography: Assigning streamlines to brain parcellations is not trivial but highly consequential.基于弥散张量成像的连接组学研究:将示踪的轨迹线分配到脑区并不是一件简单的事,但其结果却非常重要。
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:160-171. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 11.
4
Structural Brain Network Reproducibility: Influence of Different Diffusion Acquisition and Tractography Reconstruction Schemes on Graph Metrics.结构脑网络可重复性:不同扩散采集和轨迹重建方案对图度量的影响。
Brain Connect. 2022 Oct;12(8):754-767. doi: 10.1089/brain.2021.0123. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
5
Exploring the limits of network topology estimation using diffusion-based tractography and tracer studies in the macaque cortex.利用基于扩散的束追踪和示踪剂研究探索猕猴大脑皮层网络拓扑估计的极限。
Neuroimage. 2019 May 1;191:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
6
Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI?从弥散磁共振成像中获取密集加权结构连接体的图论分析是否需要去除弱连接?
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 1;194:68-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.039. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
7
Tensor network factorizations: Relationships between brain structural connectomes and traits.张量网络分解:脑结构连接组与特征之间的关系。
Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 15;197:330-343. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
8
The effects of SIFT on the reproducibility and biological accuracy of the structural connectome.SIFT 对结构连接组学的可重复性和生物学准确性的影响。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 1;104:253-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
9
The Connectomes: Methods of White Matter Tractography and Contributions of Resting State fMRI.连接组学:白质束轨迹方法和静息态 fMRI 的贡献。
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2021 Oct;42(5):507-522. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
10
Reproducibility and intercorrelation of graph theoretical measures in structural brain connectivity networks.结构脑连接网络中图论度量的可重复性和相关性。
Med Image Anal. 2019 Feb;52:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional Brain Network Disruptions in Parkinson's Disease: Insights from Information Theory and Machine Learning.帕金森病中的功能性脑网络破坏:来自信息论和机器学习的见解
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 4;14(23):2728. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232728.
2
Exploring personalized structural connectomics for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.探索适用于中重度创伤性脑损伤的个性化结构连接组学。
Netw Neurosci. 2023 Jan 1;7(1):160-183. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00277. eCollection 2023.
3
Quantitative mapping of the brain's structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography: A review.

本文引用的文献

1
Common misconceptions, hidden biases and modern challenges of dMRI tractography.弥散磁共振成像纤维束追踪的常见误区、潜在偏差与现代挑战。
J Neural Eng. 2020 Feb 18;17(1):011001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab6aad.
2
MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation.MRtrix3:一个用于医学图像处理和可视化的快速、灵活、开放的软件框架。
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116137. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
Neuroimaging Findings in US Government Personnel With Possible Exposure to Directional Phenomena in Havana, Cuba.
基于弥散磁共振成像追踪技术的脑结构连接的定量图谱:综述。
Neuroimage. 2022 Apr 1;249:118870. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118870. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
4
Network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes.网络对齐与相似性揭示了基于图谱的结构连接组中的拓扑差异。
Netw Neurosci. 2021 Aug 30;5(3):711-733. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00199. eCollection 2021.
美国政府人员在古巴哈瓦那可能接触到定向现象的神经影像学研究结果。
JAMA. 2019 Jul 23;322(4):336-347. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9269.
4
Connectomes from streamlines tractography: Assigning streamlines to brain parcellations is not trivial but highly consequential.基于弥散张量成像的连接组学研究:将示踪的轨迹线分配到脑区并不是一件简单的事,但其结果却非常重要。
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:160-171. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 11.
5
Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI?从弥散磁共振成像中获取密集加权结构连接体的图论分析是否需要去除弱连接?
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 1;194:68-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.039. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
6
The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography.基于弥散张量成像的人类连接组图谱绘制挑战。
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 7;8(1):1349. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x.
7
Neuropsychological Recovery Trajectories in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Influence of Patient Characteristics and Diffuse Axonal Injury.中度至重度创伤性脑损伤的神经心理学康复轨迹:患者特征和弥漫性轴索损伤的影响。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Mar;24(3):237-246. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717000996. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Building connectomes using diffusion MRI: why, how and but.基于弥散磁共振成像构建连接组学:为何、如何以及但是。
NMR Biomed. 2019 Apr;32(4):e3752. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3752. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
9
High angular resolution diffusion-weighted imaging in mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤的高角分辨率扩散加权成像
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Nov 17;13:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.11.016. eCollection 2017.
10
Small-World Brain Networks Revisited.再次探讨小世界脑网络。
Neuroscientist. 2017 Oct;23(5):499-516. doi: 10.1177/1073858416667720. Epub 2016 Sep 21.