憩室炎:旧观念的新视角。
Diverticulitis: An Update From the Age Old Paradigm.
机构信息
Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
出版信息
Curr Probl Surg. 2020 Oct;57(10):100862. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100862. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
For a disease process that affects so many, we continue to struggle to define optimal care for patients with diverticular disease. Part of this stems from the fact that diverticular disease requires different treatment strategies across the natural history- acute, chronic and recurrent. To understand where we are currently, it is worth understanding how treatment of diverticular disease has evolved. Diverticular disease was rarely described in the literature prior to the 1900’s. In the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, Painter and Burkitt popularized the theory that diverticulosis is a disease of Western civilization based on the observation that diverticulosis was rare in rural Africa but common in economically developed countries. Previous surgical guidelines focused on early operative intervention to avoid potential complicated episodes of recurrent complicated diverticulitis (e.g., with free perforation) that might necessitate emergent surgery and stoma formation. More recent data has challenged prior concerns about decreasing effectiveness of medical management with repeat episodes and the notion that the natural history of diverticulitis is progressive. It has also permitted more accurate grading of the severity of disease and permitted less invasive management options to attempt conversion of urgent operations into the elective setting, or even avoid an operation altogether. The role of diet in preventing diverticular disease has long been debated. A high fiber diet appears to decrease the likelihood of symptomatic diverticulitis. The myth of avoid eating nuts, corn, popcorn, and seeds to prevent episodes of diverticulitis has been debunked with modern data. Overall, the recommendations for “diverticulitis diets” mirror those made for overall healthy lifestyle – high fiber, with a focus on whole grains, fruits and vegetables. Diverticulosis is one of the most common incidental findings on colonoscopy and the eighth most common outpatient diagnosis in the United States. Over 50% of people over the age of 60 and over 60% of people over age 80 have colonic diverticula. Of those with diverticulosis, the lifetime risk of developing diverticulitis is estimated at 10–25%, although more recent studies estimate a 5% rate of progression to diverticulitis. Diverticulitis accounts for an estimated 371,000 emergency department visits and 200,000 inpatient admissions per year with annual cost of 2.1–2.6 billion dollars per year in the United States. The estimated total medical expenditure (inpatient and outpatient) for diverticulosis and diverticulitis in 2015 was over 5.4 billion dollars. The incidence of diverticulitis is increasing. Besides increasing age, other risk factors for diverticular disease include use of NSAIDS, aspirin, steroids, opioids, smoking and sedentary lifestyle. Diverticula most commonly occur along the mesenteric side of the antimesenteric taeniae resulting in parallel rows. These spots are thought to be relatively weak as this is the location where vasa recta penetrate the muscle to supply the mucosa. The exact mechanism that leads to diverticulitis from diverticulosis is not definitively known. The most common presenting complaint is of left lower quadrant abdominal pain with symptoms of systemic unwellness including fever and malaise, however the presentation may vary widely. The gold standard cross-sectional imaging is multi-detector CT. It is minimally invasive and has sensitivity between 98% and specificity up to 99% for diagnosing acute diverticulitis. Uncomplicated acute diverticulitis may be safely managed as an out-patient in carefully selected patients. Hospitalization is usually necessary for patients with immunosuppression, intolerance to oral intake, signs of severe sepsis, lack of social support and increased comorbidities. The role of antibiotics has been questioned in a number of randomized controlled trials and it is likely that we will see more patients with uncomplicated disease treated with observation in the future Acute diverticulitis can be further sub classified into complicated and uncomplicated presentations. Uncomplicated diverticulitis is characterized by inflammation limited to colonic wall and surrounding tissue. The management of uncomplicated diverticulitis is changing. Use of antibiotics has been questioned as it appears that antibiotic use can be avoided in select groups of patients. Surgical intervention appears to improve patient’s quality of life. The decision to proceed with surgery is recommended in an individualized manner. Complicated diverticulitis is defined as diverticulitis associated with localized or generalized perforation, localized or distant abscess, fistula, stricture or obstruction. Abscesses can be treated with percutaneous drainage if the abscess is large enough. The optimal long-term strategy for patients who undergo successful non-operative management of their diverticular abscess remains controversial. There are clearly patients who would do well with an elective colectomy and a subset who could avoid an operation all together however, the challenge is appropriate risk-stratification and patient selection. Management of patients with perforation depends greatly on the presence of feculent or purulent peritonitis, the extent of contamination and hemodynamic status and associated comorbidities. Fistulas and strictures are almost always treated with segmental colectomy. After an episode of acute diverticulitis, routine colonoscopy has been recommended by a number of societies to exclude the presence of colorectal cancer or presence of alternative diagnosis like ischemic colitis or inflammatory bowel disease for the clinical presentation. Endoscopic evaluation of the colon is normally delayed by about 6 weeks from the acute episode to reduce the risk associated with colonoscopy. Further study has questioned the need for endoscopic evaluation for every patient with acute diverticulitis. Colonoscopy should be routinely performed after complicated diverticulitis cases, when the clinical presentation is atypical or if there are any diagnostic ambiguity, or patient has other indications for colonoscopy like rectal bleeding or is above 50 years of age without recent colonoscopy. For patients in whom elective colectomy is indicated, it is imperative to identify a wide range of modifiable patient co-morbidities. Every attempt should be made to improve a patient’s chance of successful surgery. This includes optimization of patient risk factors as well as tailoring the surgical approach and perioperative management. A positive outcome depends greatly on thoughtful attention to what makes a complicated patient “complicated”. Operative management remains complex and depends on multiple factors including patient age, comorbidities, nutritional state, severity of disease, and surgeon preference and experience. Importantly, the status of surgery, elective versus urgent or emergent operation, is pivotal in decision-making, and treatment algorithms are divergent based on the acuteness of surgery. Resection of diseased bowel to healthy proximal colon and rectal margins remains a fundamental principle of treatment although the operative approach may vary. For acute diverticulitis, a number of surgical approaches exist, including loop colostomy, sigmoidectomy with colostomy (Hartmann’s procedure) and sigmoidectomy with primary colorectal anastomosis. Overall, data suggest that primary anastomosis is preferable to a Hartman’s procedure in select patients with acute diverticulitis. Patients with hemodynamic instability, immunocompromised state, feculent peritonitis, severely edematous or ischemic bowel, or significant malnutrition are poor candidates. The decision to divert after colorectal anastomosis is at the discretion of the operating surgeon. Patient factors including severity of disease, tissue quality, and comorbidities should be considered. Technical considerations for elective cases include appropriate bowel preparation, the use of a laparoscopic approach, the decision to perform a primary anastomosis, and the selected use of ureteral stents. Management of the patient with an end colostomy after a Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis can be a challenging clinical scenario. Between 20 – 50% of patients treated with sigmoid resection and an end colostomy after an initial severe bout of diverticulitis will never be reversed to their normal anatomy. The reasons for high rates of permanent colostomies are multifactorial. The debate on the best timing for a colostomy takedown continues. Six months is generally chosen as the safest time to proceed when adhesions may be at their softest allowing for a more favorable dissection. The surgical approach will be a personal decision by the operating surgeon based on his or her experience. Colostomy takedown operations are challenging surgeries. The surgeon should anticipate and appropriately plan for a long and difficult operation. The patient should undergo a full antibiotic bowel preparation. Preoperative planning is critical; review the initial operative note and defining the anatomy prior to reversal. When a complex abdominal wall closure is necessary, consider consultation with a hernia specialist. Open surgery is the preferred surgical approach for the majority of colostomy takedown operations. Finally, consider ureteral catheters, diverting loop ileostomy, and be prepared for all anastomotic options in advance. Since its inception in the late 90’s, laparoscopic lavage has been recognized as a novel treatment modality in the management of complicated diverticulitis; specifically, Hinchey III (purulent) diverticulitis. Over the last decade, it has been the subject of several randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, systematic reviews as well as cost-efficiency analyses. Despite being the subject of much debate and controversy, there is a clear role for laparoscopic lavage in the management of acute diverticulitis with the caveat that patient selection is key. Segmental colitis associated with diverticulitis (SCAD) is an inflammatory condition affecting the colon in segments that are also affected by diverticulosis, namely, the sigmoid colon. While SCAD is considered a separate clinical entity, it is frequently confused with diverticulitis or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). SCAD affects approximately 1.4% of the general population and 1.15 to 11.4% of those with diverticulosis and most commonly affects those in their 6th decade of life. The exact pathogenesis of SCAD is unknown, but proposed mechanisms include mucosal redundancy and prolapse occurring in diverticular segments, fecal stasis, and localized ischemia. Most case of SCAD resolve with a high-fiber diet and antibiotics, with salicylates reserved for more severe cases. Relapse is uncommon and immunosuppression with steroids is rarely needed. A relapsing clinical course may suggest a diagnosis of IBD and treatment as such should be initiated. Surgery is extremely uncommon and reserved for severe refractory disease. While sigmoid colon involvement is considered the most common site of colonic diverticulitis in Western countries, diverticular disease can be problematic in other areas of the colon. In Asian countries, right-sided diverticulitis outnumbers the left. This difference seems to be secondary to dietary and genetic factors. Differential diagnosis might be difficult because of similarity with appendicitis. However accurate imaging studies allow a precise preoperative diagnosis and management planning. Transverse colonic diverticulitis is very rare accounting for less than 1% of colonic diverticulitis with a perforation rate that has been estimated to be even more rare. Rectal diverticula are mostly asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally in the majority of patients and rarely require treatment. Giant colonic diverticula (GCD) is a rare presentation of diverticular disease of the colon and it is defined as an air-filled cystic diverticulum larger than 4 cm in diameter. The pathogenesis of GCD is not well defined. Overall, the management of diverticular disease depends greatly on patient, disease and surgeon factors. Only by tailoring treatment to the patient in front of us can we achieve optimal outcomes.
对于如此多的患者,我们一直在努力为患者提供将医学专业学术文献翻译成简体中文的服务。这是一个疾病过程,但我们仍在努力为其定义最佳护理方法。部分原因在于,憩室病在其自然病史中需要不同的治疗策略,包括急性、慢性和复发性。为了了解我们目前的情况,值得理解憩室病的治疗方法是如何演变的。在 1900 年代之前,文献中很少描述憩室病。在 20 世纪 60 年代末和 70 年代初,Painter 和 Burkitt 提出了憩室病是西方文明疾病的理论,其依据是憩室病在农村非洲很少见,但在经济发达的国家却很常见。以前的手术指南侧重于早期手术干预,以避免潜在的复杂复发性憩室炎(例如伴有游离穿孔)的发作,这可能需要紧急手术和造口术。最近的数据对手术治疗反复发作的憩室炎效果降低的担忧以及憩室炎自然病程进展的观点提出了质疑。它还允许更准确地分级疾病的严重程度,并允许更具侵入性的管理选择,以尝试将紧急手术转变为择期手术,甚至完全避免手术。饮食在预防憩室病方面的作用一直存在争议。高纤维饮食似乎可降低症状性憩室炎的发生几率。现代数据已经推翻了避免食用坚果、玉米、爆米花和种子以防止憩室炎发作的神话。总的来说,“憩室炎饮食”的建议与整体健康的生活方式建议相似,即高纤维,重点是全谷物、水果和蔬菜。憩室病是结肠镜检查中最常见的偶然发现之一,也是美国第八大最常见的门诊诊断。超过 60 岁的人群中有超过 50%,超过 80 岁的人群中有超过 60%患有结肠憩室病。在患有憩室病的人群中,憩室炎的发病风险估计为 10-25%,尽管最近的研究估计其进展为憩室炎的发病率为 5%。憩室炎估计每年导致 371,000 次急诊就诊和 200,000 次住院治疗,每年在美国的医疗费用为 2.1-2.6 亿美元。憩室病和憩室炎在 2015 年的估计总医疗支出(住院和门诊)超过 54 亿美元。憩室炎的发病率正在增加。除了年龄增长之外,憩室病的其他风险因素还包括使用 NSAIDs、阿司匹林、类固醇、阿片类药物、吸烟和久坐不动的生活方式。憩室最常见于沿对系膜缘的肠系膜侧的半系膜线上,导致平行排列。这些部位被认为相对较弱,因为这是直肠直血管穿入肌肉供应粘膜的位置。导致憩室炎从憩室病发展而来的确切机制尚不清楚。最常见的表现是左下腹腹痛,伴有全身不适的症状,包括发热和不适,但表现可能差异很大。憩室炎的黄金标准横断面成像为多探测器 CT。它具有微创性,诊断急性憩室炎的灵敏度为 98%至 99%,特异性高达 99%。对于精心选择的患者,可以安全地对无并发症的急性憩室炎进行门诊治疗。对于免疫抑制、不能口服摄入、有严重败血症迹象、缺乏社会支持和合并症较多的患者,通常需要住院治疗。在一些随机对照试验中对抗生素的作用提出了质疑,未来我们可能会看到更多患有单纯性疾病的患者在接受观察治疗。急性憩室炎可进一步分为复杂和非复杂表现。非复杂性憩室炎的特征是炎症局限于结肠壁和周围组织。非复杂性憩室炎的管理正在发生变化。抗生素的使用受到了质疑,因为在某些患者群体中可以避免使用抗生素。手术干预似乎可以改善患者的生活质量。建议以个体化的方式进行手术。复杂的憩室炎定义为憩室炎伴有局部或全身穿孔、局部或远处脓肿、瘘管、狭窄或梗阻。如果脓肿足够大,可以通过经皮引流进行治疗。对于成功接受非手术治疗的憩室脓肿患者,最佳长期策略仍存在争议。显然,有些患者会接受择期结肠切除术,有些患者可以完全避免手术,但挑战在于进行适当的风险分层和患者选择。接受成功的非手术管理的患者,应根据穿孔是否伴有粪便或脓性腹膜炎、污染程度以及血流动力学状态和相关合并症来决定是否进行手术治疗。瘘管和狭窄几乎总是需要通过节段性结肠切除术进行治疗。在急性憩室炎发作后,许多学会都建议进行结肠镜检查以排除结直肠癌或缺血性结肠炎或炎症性肠病等其他替代诊断的存在,因为其临床表现。由于存在结肠镜检查相关的风险,通常会将急性憩室炎的内镜评估延迟约 6 周,以降低与结肠镜检查相关的风险。进一步的研究对每个患有急性憩室炎的患者进行内镜评估的必要性提出了质疑。对于复杂的憩室炎病例,应常规进行内镜检查,对于不典型的临床表现或存在任何诊断歧义的情况,或患者有其他接受结肠镜检查的指征,如直肠出血或年龄超过 50 岁且无近期结肠镜检查,也应进行常规内镜检查。对于需要进行择期结肠切除术的患者,确定广泛的可纠正的患者合并症至关重要。应尽一切努力提高患者成功手术的机会。这包括优化患者的风险因素以及调整手术方法和围手术期管理。一个积极的结果在很大程度上取决于对使复杂患者“复杂”的因素的深思熟虑。手术管理仍然复杂,取决于多种因素,包括患者年龄、合并症、营养状况、疾病严重程度以及外科医生的偏好和经验。重要的是,手术的状态,即紧急或紧急手术与择期手术,对决策具有关键作用,并且治疗方案因手术的紧迫性而有所不同。尽管手术方法可能有所不同,但保留患病肠段至近端健康结肠和直肠边缘仍然是治疗的基本原理,尽管手术方法可能有所不同。对于急性憩室炎,有多种手术方法,包括结肠造口术、乙状结肠切除术伴结肠造口术(Hartmann 手术)和乙状结肠切除术伴直肠结肠端端吻合术。总体而言,数据表明,对于急性憩室炎,选择性吻合术优于 Hartmann 手术。对于有血流动力学不稳定、免疫抑制、粪便性腹膜炎、严重水肿或缺血性肠病或明显营养不良的患者,不适合进行此类手术。是否进行结肠吻合术的决定由手术医生决定。患者因素包括疾病严重程度、组织质量和合并症等,均应考虑在内。择期病例的技术考虑因素包括适当的肠道准备、腹腔镜方法的使用、是否进行原发性吻合术以及选择性使用输尿管支架的决定。在 Hartmann 手术后对急性憩室炎进行结肠造口术的患者的管理可能是一个具有挑战性的临床情况。在最初严重发作憩室炎后接受乙状结肠切除术和末端结肠造口术的患者中,有 20-50%的患者可能永远不会恢复到正常解剖结构。导致永久性造口术高发生率的原因有很多。对于何时进行造口术的最佳时机的争论仍在继续。一般选择在初次发作后 6 个月,因为此时粘连可能最软,使吻合更容易。手术方法将由手术医生根据