Bachelani Arshad M, Holton Laura A, Soliman Youssef
Penn Highlands Mon Valley, 1163 Country Club Road, Monongahela, PA 15063, USA.
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, 20 Seton Hill Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601, USA.
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 May 15;13:100180. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100180. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Recommendations for surgery of diverticular abscesses continue to evolve. This study aimed to examine the short- and long-term results of nonoperative management of diverticular abscesses while analyzing granular data to assess for predictive factors for successful treatment.
We analyzed patients admitted with diverticular abscesses at Penn Highlands Mon Valley Hospital from 2010 to 2020 who received initial planned nonoperative management. Short-term failure was defined as requiring surgery within 60 days of diagnosis, whereas long-term failure was defined as requiring surgery beyond 60 days. Successful treatment was defined as treatment that did not require surgery.
In total, 857 patient charts were individually analyzed. Sixty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period was 48 months. Nineteen (30.2%) patients experienced short-term failure of nonoperative management, whereas 6 (9.5%) patients experienced long-term failure. Surgery was successfully avoided in the remaining 41 (60.3%) patients. Abscess size was significantly associated with success rate (< 3 cm, 85.7%; 3-5 cm, 42.3%; > 5 cm, 33.3%; = 0.001). When corrected for the abscess size, percutaneous drainage did not affect the requirement for eventual surgery.
Nonoperative management is a reasonable option for diverticular abscesses and is particularly successful in patients with abscesses < 3 cm in diameter. Although sometimes performed in conjunction with nonoperative management, percutaneous drainage does not decrease the requirement for eventual surgery. Elective surgery should be considered for patients with larger abscesses. Future prospective studies may further clarify the role of the nonoperative management of diverticular abscesses.
关于憩室脓肿手术的建议不断发展。本研究旨在探讨憩室脓肿非手术治疗的短期和长期结果,同时分析详细数据以评估成功治疗的预测因素。
我们分析了2010年至2020年在宾夕法尼亚高地蒙谷医院因憩室脓肿入院且接受初始计划非手术治疗的患者。短期失败定义为在诊断后60天内需要手术,而长期失败定义为在60天后需要手术。成功治疗定义为无需手术的治疗。
总共对857份患者病历进行了单独分析。63名患者符合纳入标准。中位随访期为48个月。19名(30.2%)患者经历了非手术治疗的短期失败,而6名(9.5%)患者经历了长期失败。其余41名(60.3%)患者成功避免了手术。脓肿大小与成功率显著相关(<3 cm,85.7%;3 - 5 cm,42.3%;>5 cm,33.3%;P = 0 . .001)。校正脓肿大小后,经皮引流不影响最终手术的需求。
非手术治疗是憩室脓肿的合理选择,对于直径<3 cm的脓肿患者尤其成功。尽管经皮引流有时与非手术治疗联合进行,但它不会降低最终手术的需求。对于脓肿较大的患者应考虑择期手术。未来的前瞻性研究可能会进一步阐明憩室脓肿非手术治疗的作用。