• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调强适形放射治疗 9 野照射比 7 野照射治疗鼻咽癌更优吗?

Is 9-field IMRT superior to 7-field IMRT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

机构信息

Department of Radiation Physics, Oncology and Hematology Hospital, Maadi Armed Forces Medical Compound, Cairo, Egypt.

Department of Radiotherapy, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

出版信息

Indian J Cancer. 2020 Oct-Dec;57(4):388-392. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_555_18.

DOI:10.4103/ijc.IJC_555_18
PMID:33078744
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the pros and cons of 9-field intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to 7-field IMRT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

Ten NPC patients were treated with 7F-IMRT and 9F-IMRT. A dose prescription of 70 Gy was delivered in 35 fractions to gross planning target volume (PTV1). Plan verification was performed via 2D-array and film dosimetry. Dose-Volume Histogram (DVH) parameters were used to evaluate the quality of IMRT plans.

RESULTS

Dose data for the investigated planning techniques obeyed the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol no. 0615. The dose delivered to PTV1 and organs-at-risk (OARs) for 9F-IMRT was significantly better than 7F-IMRT, except for OARs which were at a distance from PTV1, such as eyes, optical nerves, and chiasma. Ninety five percent of PTV1 was covered by more than 95% of the prescribed dose (67.75 ± 1.1 Gy and 68.57 ± 1.2 Gy for 7F-IMRT and 9F-IMRT, respectively). The maximum dose to 1% of brainstem was 50.06 ± 2.7 Gy and 47.75 ± 2.6 Gy for 7F-IMRT and 9F-IMRT, respectively. Dose verification showed good agreement with treatment planning system with a maximum deviation for 2D-array of 2.16% ± 0.86 and 1.73% ± 0.33 for 7F-IMRT and 9F-IMRT, respectively. Similarly, radiochromic film reported maximum dose deviations of 3.38% ± 1.68 and 2.77% ± 1.3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

9F-IMRT provides better homogenous dose to PTV1 and more sparing of OARs over 7F-IMRT for NPC patients, except for OARs which are are a distance from PTV1.

摘要

背景

评估 9 野强度调制放疗(IMRT)与 7 野 IMRT 治疗鼻咽癌(NPC)的优缺点。

方法

对 10 例 NPC 患者分别采用 7F-IMRT 和 9F-IMRT 治疗。大体肿瘤靶区(PTV1)给予 70Gy/35 次剂量。通过二维矩阵和胶片剂量测定进行计划验证。剂量-体积直方图(DVH)参数用于评估 IMRT 计划质量。

结果

所研究的计划技术的剂量数据符合放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)协议号 0615。9F-IMRT 给予 PTV1 和危及器官(OARs)的剂量明显优于 7F-IMRT,除了远离 PTV1 的 OARs 如眼睛、视神经和视交叉。95%的 PTV1 被超过 95%的规定剂量覆盖(7F-IMRT 和 9F-IMRT 分别为 67.75±1.1Gy 和 68.57±1.2Gy)。脑干 1%的最大剂量分别为 50.06±2.7Gy 和 47.75±2.6Gy。剂量验证与治疗计划系统吻合良好,二维矩阵最大偏差分别为 2.16%±0.86%和 1.73%±0.33%,7F-IMRT 和 9F-IMRT。同样,放射色胶片报告的最大剂量偏差分别为 3.38%±1.68%和 2.77%±1.3%。

结论

9F-IMRT 为 NPC 患者提供了更好的 PTV1 均匀剂量,对 OARs 的保护作用优于 7F-IMRT,除了远离 PTV1 的 OARs。

相似文献

1
Is 9-field IMRT superior to 7-field IMRT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma?调强适形放射治疗 9 野照射比 7 野照射治疗鼻咽癌更优吗?
Indian J Cancer. 2020 Oct-Dec;57(4):388-392. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_555_18.
2
Dosimetry study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on Halcyon accelerator fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy.基于 Halcyon 加速器固定野强度调制放射治疗的鼻咽癌剂量学研究。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2021 Nov;17(5):1165-1171. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_992_21.
3
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.容积旋转调强弧形治疗与常规调强适形放疗在食管癌中的比较:一项治疗计划的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 7;18(37):5266-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5266.
4
Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.二维放射治疗与调强放射治疗在晚期T 期鼻咽癌治疗中的剂量学比较:在脑干和脊髓的计划危及器官体积中是少照射还是多照射。
Med Dosim. 2007 Winter;32(4):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.02.006.
5
F-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography/CT-guided volumetric-modulated arc therapy-based dose escalation for hypoxic subvolume in nasopharyngeal carcinomas: A feasibility study.基于F-氟米索硝唑正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描引导的容积调强弧形放疗对鼻咽癌缺氧亚体积进行剂量递增的可行性研究。
Head Neck. 2017 Dec;39(12):2519-2527. doi: 10.1002/hed.24925. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
6
Dose-volume histogram prediction in volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinomas based on uniform-intensity radiation with equal angle intervals.基于等角度间隔均匀强度放射的鼻咽癌容积调强弧形治疗中的剂量-体积直方图预测。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Dec 5;64(23):23NT03. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5433.
7
Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.调强放射治疗与调强质子治疗在复发性鼻咽癌治疗中的剂量学比较
Med Dosim. 2022;47(1):14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
8
Dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) of nasopharyngeal carcinomas: a simultaneous integrated boost treatment plan comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapies and single arc VMAT.鼻咽癌的双弧容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT):与调强放疗和单弧 VMAT 的同步综合增敏治疗计划比较。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Apr;24(3):196-207. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
9
Evaluation of dose-volume histogram prediction for organ-at risk and planning target volume based on machine learning.基于机器学习的危及器官和计划靶区剂量-体积直方图预测评估。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3117. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82749-5.
10
Determining appropriate timing of adaptive radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma during intensity-modulated radiation therapy.确定鼻咽癌在调强放射治疗期间进行自适应放射治疗的合适时机。
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Sep 17;10:192. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0498-1.