Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec;31(12):3124-3131. doi: 10.1111/jce.14781. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
Ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has emerged as an effective method of rhythm control. This exploratory analysis aimed to determine how various measures of recurrence would influence the definition of treatment success.
Using an electronic health record data set from January 2007 to June 2019 linked with Medtronic cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) data, patients who underwent a first AF ablation procedure following CIED implantation were identified. Data were analyzed for recurrence of AF stratified by varying definitions of successful ablation. The performance of various simulated external AF monitoring strategies was assessed.
A total of 665 patients were analyzed including 248 with paroxysmal AF (mean age: 66.2 ± 9.3 years, 73.0% male) and 417 patients with persistent AF (mean age: 67.3 ± 9.0 years, 73.6% male). Among patients with paroxysmal AF, survival free from recurrence at 1 year ranged from 28.2% to 72.1% (>6 min and >23 h thresholds, respectively) with an overall median percentage of time in AF reduction of 99.6%. Among patients with persistent AF, survival free from recurrence at 1 year ranged from 24.9% to 60.0% (>6 min and 7 consecutive days > 23 h thresholds, respectively) with an overall median percentage of time in AF reduction of 99.3%. A single 7-day monitoring strategy had a sensitivity of less than 50% for detecting AF greater than 6 min in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF.
In this real-world data set of AF patients with CIEDs undergoing catheter ablation, treatment success varied substantially with different definitions of minimally required AF duration and is significantly impacted by the method of recurrence detection.
房颤(AF)消融已成为节律控制的有效方法。本探索性分析旨在确定各种复发衡量标准如何影响治疗成功的定义。
使用 2007 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间的电子病历数据集,与美敦力心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)数据相关联,确定了在 CIED 植入后首次接受 AF 消融的患者。根据不同消融成功定义,对 AF 复发分层分析数据。评估了各种模拟外部 AF 监测策略的性能。
共分析了 665 例患者,其中 248 例为阵发性 AF(平均年龄:66.2±9.3 岁,73.0%为男性),417 例为持续性 AF(平均年龄:67.3±9.0 岁,73.6%为男性)。在阵发性 AF 患者中,1 年无复发的生存率从 28.2%到 72.1%不等(>6 分钟和>23 小时阈值分别),AF 总时间减少中位数为 99.6%。在持续性 AF 患者中,1 年无复发的生存率从 24.9%到 60.0%不等(>6 分钟和 7 天连续>23 小时阈值分别),AF 总时间减少中位数为 99.3%。在阵发性和持续性 AF 患者中,单次 7 天监测策略对检测大于 6 分钟的 AF 的灵敏度均低于 50%。
在这个具有 CIED 的 AF 患者的真实世界数据集的导管消融中,治疗成功与最小所需 AF 持续时间的不同定义有很大差异,并且受到复发检测方法的显著影响。