Department of Psychology, York University.
Centre for Vision Research, York University.
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1470-1474. doi: 10.1177/0956797620956986. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
Rapidly judging the number of objects in a scene is an important perceptual ability. Recent debates have centered on whether number perception is accomplished by dedicated mechanisms and, in particular, on whether number-adaptation aftereffects reflect adaptation of number per se or adaptation of related stimulus properties, such as density. Here, we report an adaptation experiment ( = 8) for which the predictions of number and density theories are diametrically opposed. We found that when a reference stimulus has higher density than an adaptation stimulus but contains fewer elements, adaptation reduces the perceived number of elements in the reference stimulus. This is consistent with number adaptation and inconsistent with density adaptation. Thus, number-adaptation aftereffects are more than a by-product of density adaptation: When density and number are dissociated, adaptation effects are in the direction predicted by adaptation to number, not density.
快速判断场景中的物体数量是一种重要的感知能力。最近的争论集中在数量感知是否是通过专门的机制来完成的,特别是在数量适应后效是否反映了数量本身的适应还是相关刺激属性(如密度)的适应。在这里,我们报告了一个适应实验(n = 8),其预测与数量和密度理论完全相反。我们发现,当参考刺激的密度高于适应刺激但包含的元素较少时,适应会减少参考刺激中元素的感知数量。这与数量适应一致,与密度适应不一致。因此,数量适应后效不仅仅是密度适应的副产品:当密度和数量分离时,适应效果与数量适应而不是密度适应的方向一致。