• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过动态重新加权实现选择偏差校正可视化。

Selection-Bias-Corrected Visualization via Dynamic Reweighting.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021 Feb;27(2):1481-1491. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030455. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030455
PMID:33079667
Abstract

The collection and visual analysis of large-scale data from complex systems, such as electronic health records or clickstream data, has become increasingly common across a wide range of industries. This type of retrospective visual analysis, however, is prone to a variety of selection bias effects, especially for high-dimensional data where only a subset of dimensions is visualized at any given time. The risk of selection bias is even higher when analysts dynamically apply filters or perform grouping operations during ad hoc analyses. These bias effects threaten the validity and generalizability of insights discovered during visual analysis as the basis for decision making. Past work has focused on bias transparency, helping users understand when selection bias may have occurred. However, countering the effects of selection bias via bias mitigation is typically left for the user to accomplish as a separate process. Dynamic reweighting (DR) is a novel computational approach to selection bias mitigation that helps users craft bias-corrected visualizations. This paper describes the DR workflow, introduces key DR visualization designs, and presents statistical methods that support the DR process. Use cases from the medical domain, as well as findings from domain expert user interviews, are also reported.

摘要

从电子健康记录或点击流数据等复杂系统中收集和可视化分析大规模数据,在许多行业中已经变得越来越普遍。然而,这种回溯式可视化分析容易受到各种选择偏差的影响,特别是在高维数据中,任何给定时间只能可视化一部分维度。当分析师在临时分析过程中动态应用过滤器或执行分组操作时,选择偏差的风险更高。这些偏差效应威胁到在视觉分析中发现的洞察力的有效性和普遍性,因为这些洞察力是决策的基础。过去的工作主要集中在偏差透明度上,帮助用户了解选择偏差何时可能发生。然而,通过偏差缓解来抵消选择偏差的影响通常留给用户作为一个单独的过程来完成。动态重新加权 (DR) 是一种用于选择偏差缓解的新型计算方法,可以帮助用户制作偏差校正的可视化。本文描述了 DR 工作流程,介绍了关键的 DR 可视化设计,并提出了支持 DR 过程的统计方法。还报告了来自医学领域的用例以及来自领域专家用户访谈的发现。

相似文献

1
Selection-Bias-Corrected Visualization via Dynamic Reweighting.通过动态重新加权实现选择偏差校正可视化。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021 Feb;27(2):1481-1491. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030455. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Selection Bias Tracking and Detailed Subset Comparison for High-Dimensional Data.高维数据的选择偏差跟踪和详细子集比较。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020 Jan;26(1):429-439. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934209. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Visual Analysis of High-Dimensional Event Sequence Data via Dynamic Hierarchical Aggregation.通过动态层次聚合对高维事件序列数据进行可视化分析
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020 Jan;26(1):440-450. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934661. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
5
Improving Visualization Interpretation Using Counterfactuals.
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2022 Jan;28(1):998-1008. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114779. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
6
Visual analytics in cheminformatics: user-supervised descriptor selection for QSAR methods.化学信息学中的可视化分析:用于定量构效关系方法的用户监督描述符选择
J Cheminform. 2015 Aug 19;7:39. doi: 10.1186/s13321-015-0092-4. eCollection 2015.
7
SeeDB: Efficient Data-Driven Visualization Recommendations to Support Visual Analytics.SeeDB:支持可视化分析的高效数据驱动型可视化推荐
Proceedings VLDB Endowment. 2015 Sep;8(13):2182-2193.
8
Progressive Visual Analytics: User-Driven Visual Exploration of In-Progress Analytics.渐进式视觉分析:用户驱动的进行中分析的视觉探索
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2014 Dec;20(12):1653-62. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346574.
9
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
10
Human factors of the confirmation bias in intelligence analysis: decision support from graphical evidence landscapes.情报分析中确认偏差的人为因素:来自图形证据格局的决策支持。
Hum Factors. 2008 Oct;50(5):745-54. doi: 10.1518/001872008X354183.