Suppr超能文献

评价直接口服抗凝剂治疗门静脉血栓形成的疗效和安全性。

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis.

机构信息

St. Louis College of Pharmacy at University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

West Virginia University School of Pharmacy.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun 1;33(6):911-916. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001958.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin for portal vein thrombosis treatment.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study. Adult patients initiated on a direct oral anticoagulant or warfarin for treatment of a new portal vein thrombosis were included. The primary failure outcome was the absolute difference in recurrent thromboembolic events 90 days following initiation of a direct oral anticoagulant vs. warfarin. The primary safety outcome was the absolute difference in bleeding events 90 days following initiation of a direct oral anticoagulant vs. warfarin. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact, and Student's t-tests were utilized as appropriate.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included. Thirteen (39.4%) patients received direct oral anticoagulants, and 20 (60.6%) received warfarin. None of the patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants experienced a primary failure event compared to four receiving warfarin (P < 0.001). None of the patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants experienced a primary safety event vs. one receiving warfarin (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Direct oral anticoagulants appear to be effective and safe in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis and in preventing recurrent thromboembolic events. Future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm direct oral anticoagulants' efficacy in portal vein thrombosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗门静脉血栓形成的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项单中心、回顾性研究。纳入新诊断为门静脉血栓形成并开始使用直接口服抗凝剂或华法林治疗的成年患者。主要失败结局为直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗开始后 90 天内复发性血栓栓塞事件的绝对差异。主要安全性结局为直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗开始后 90 天内出血事件的绝对差异。适当使用描述性统计、Fisher 确切检验和学生 t 检验。

结果

共纳入 33 例患者。13 例(39.4%)患者接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗,20 例(60.6%)患者接受华法林治疗。与接受华法林治疗的患者相比,无接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的患者发生主要失败事件(P<0.001)。与接受华法林治疗的患者相比,无接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的患者发生主要安全性事件(P<0.001)。

结论

直接口服抗凝剂在治疗门静脉血栓形成和预防复发性血栓栓塞事件方面似乎是有效且安全的。未来需要更大样本量的研究来证实直接口服抗凝剂在门静脉血栓形成中的疗效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
[Portal vein thrombosis-treatment options].[门静脉血栓形成——治疗选择]
Gastroenterologe. 2021;16(2):79-89. doi: 10.1007/s11377-021-00507-5. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验