Suppr超能文献

直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗脑静脉血栓形成(ACTION-CVT)的多中心国际研究。

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (ACTION-CVT): A Multicenter International Study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, RI (S.Y., L.S., C.S., N.K., S.E.J., A.C., S.C., K.F.).

Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (E.B.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2022 Mar;53(3):728-738. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037541. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A small randomized controlled trial suggested that dabigatran may be as effective as warfarin in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). We aimed to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in a real-world CVT cohort.

METHODS

This multicenter international retrospective study (United States, Europe, New Zealand) included consecutive patients with CVT treated with oral anticoagulation from January 2015 to December 2020. We abstracted demographics and CVT risk factors, hypercoagulable labs, baseline imaging data, and clinical and radiological outcomes from medical records. We used adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox-regression models to compare recurrent cerebral or systemic venous thrombosis, death, and major hemorrhage in patients treated with warfarin versus DOACs. We performed adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression to compare recanalization rates on follow-up imaging across the 2 treatments groups.

RESULTS

Among 1025 CVT patients across 27 centers, 845 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 44.8 years, 64.7% were women; 33.0% received DOAC only, 51.8% received warfarin only, and 15.1% received both treatments at different times. During a median follow-up of 345 (interquartile range, 140-720) days, there were 5.68 recurrent venous thrombosis, 3.77 major hemorrhages, and 1.84 deaths per 100 patient-years. Among 525 patients who met recanalization analysis inclusion criteria, 36.6% had complete, 48.2% had partial, and 15.2% had no recanalization. When compared with warfarin, DOAC treatment was associated with similar risk of recurrent venous thrombosis (aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.51-1.73]; =0.84), death (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.22-2.76]; =0.70), and rate of partial/complete recanalization (aOR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.48-1.73]; =0.79), but a lower risk of major hemorrhage (aHR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.82]; =0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CVT, treatment with DOACs was associated with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes and favorable safety profile when compared with warfarin treatment. Our findings need confirmation by large prospective or randomized studies.

摘要

背景

一项小型随机对照试验表明,达比加群在治疗脑静脉血栓形成(CVT)方面可能与华法林一样有效。我们旨在比较真实世界 CVT 队列中直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)与华法林的疗效。

方法

本研究为多中心国际回顾性研究(美国、欧洲、新西兰),纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受口服抗凝治疗的连续 CVT 患者。我们从病历中提取人口统计学和 CVT 危险因素、高凝实验室检查、基线影像学数据以及临床和影像学结局。我们使用调整后的逆概率治疗加权 Cox 回归模型比较华法林与 DOAC 治疗患者的复发性脑或系统性静脉血栓形成、死亡和大出血。我们使用调整后的逆概率治疗加权逻辑回归比较两组治疗患者在随访影像学上的再通率。

结果

在 27 个中心的 1025 例 CVT 患者中,845 例符合纳入标准。平均年龄为 44.8 岁,64.7%为女性;33.0%仅接受 DOAC 治疗,51.8%仅接受华法林治疗,15.1%在不同时间同时接受两种治疗。中位随访 345(四分位距 140-720)天,每 100 患者年发生静脉血栓形成复发 5.68 例、大出血 3.77 例和死亡 1.84 例。在符合再通分析纳入标准的 525 例患者中,36.6%完全再通,48.2%部分再通,15.2%无再通。与华法林相比,DOAC 治疗与复发性静脉血栓形成风险相似(调整后 HR,0.94[95%CI,0.51-1.73];=0.84)、死亡率(调整后 HR,0.78[95%CI,0.22-2.76];=0.70)和部分/完全再通率(调整后 OR,0.92[95%CI,0.48-1.73];=0.79),但大出血风险较低(调整后 HR,0.35[95%CI,0.15-0.82];=0.02)。

结论

在 CVT 患者中,与华法林治疗相比,DOAC 治疗的临床和影像学结局相似,且安全性良好。我们的研究结果需要大样本前瞻性或随机研究的验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验