• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性抗生素抑制冲洗和清创与 2 期翻修置换在广泛器械使用的翻修全膝关节置换术中同样有效。

Irrigation and Debridement with Chronic Antibiotic Suppression Is as Effective as 2-Stage Exchange in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Extensive Instrumentation.

机构信息

OrthoCarolina Hip & Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 6;103(1):53-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00240.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.20.00240
PMID:33079900
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extraction of implants because of periprosthetic infection (PJI) following complex revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with extensive instrumentation is a daunting undertaking for surgeon and patient alike. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether infections following complex rTKA are better treated with 2-stage exchange or irrigation and debridement (I&D) with modular component exchange and antibiotic suppression in terms of infection control, reoperation, and function.

METHODS

We reviewed rTKAs that had been performed for the treatment of PJI from 2005 to 2016. Extensive instrumentation was defined as the presence ≥1 of the following: metaphyseal cones/sleeves, distal femoral replacement, periprosthetic fracture instrumentation, or fully cemented stems measuring >75 mm. Cases were categorized according to the initial treatment (I&D with antibiotic suppression or initiation of 2-stage exchange).

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients with PJI and extensive instrumentation were identified: 56 patients who were managed with I&D with suppression and 31 who were managed with the initiation of 2-stage exchange. The rate of success (defined as no reoperation for infection) was similar for the 2 groups (62.5% the I&D group compared with 67.7% for the 2-stage group; p = 0.62). The rate of mortality was also similar (39.3% for the I&D group compared with 38.7% for the 2-stage group; p = 0.96). Of the 31 patients in the 2-stage group, 18 (58.1%) underwent reimplantation with a revision replacement. Of those 18 patients, 13 were still infection-free at the time of the most recent follow-up; however, when the analysis was expanded to all 31 patients in the 2-stage group, only 13 (41.9%) both had a successful reimplantation and did not require additional surgery for infection. Nine (29.0%) of the 31 patients in the 2-stage group never underwent the second stage, and 4 (12.9%) of the 31 required arthrodesis at the second stage. In contrast, 35 (62.5%) of the 56 patients in the I&D group were successfully managed, without additional surgery for the treatment of infection. At the time of the latest follow-up (mean, 3.2 years; range, 2 to 13 years), more patients in the I&D group were ambulatory (76.8% in the I&D group compared with 54.8% in the 2-stage group; p = 0.05) and maintained a functional bending knee joint (85.7% in the I&D group compared with 45.2% in the 2-stage group; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of periprosthetic infection of rTKA with extensive instrumentation, I&D with chronic antibiotic suppression was as effective as 2-stage exchange in terms of preventing reoperation for infection and was more effective in terms of maintaining function. These data apply to rTKA with extensive periarticular instrumentation and should not be extrapolated to primary or simple revision implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

在进行复杂的全膝关节翻修术(rTKA)时,由于假体周围感染(PJI)而需要取出假体,这对于外科医生和患者来说都是一项艰巨的任务。本研究的目的是评估在控制感染、再次手术和功能方面,对于广泛使用器械的复杂 rTKA 后发生的感染,采用 2 期置换术还是灌洗清创术(I&D)联合模块化组件置换和抗生素抑制更为有效。

方法

我们回顾了 2005 年至 2016 年治疗 PJI 的 rTKA。广泛使用器械的定义为存在以下任何一种情况≥1:骨水泥型髓内钉/套管、股骨远端置换、假体周围骨折器械或完全骨水泥固定的长度>75mm的柄。根据初始治疗(I&D 联合抗生素抑制或开始 2 期置换)对病例进行分类。

结果

确定了 87 例 PJI 伴广泛器械使用的患者:56 例患者接受 I&D 联合抗生素抑制治疗,31 例患者接受 2 期置换术治疗。2 组的成功率(定义为无感染再次手术)相似(I&D 组为 62.5%,2 期组为 67.7%;p=0.62)。死亡率也相似(I&D 组为 39.3%,2 期组为 38.7%;p=0.96)。在 2 期组的 31 例患者中,18 例(58.1%)进行了翻修置换的再植入。在这 18 例患者中,在最近的随访时,13 例仍无感染;然而,当分析扩展到 2 期组的所有 31 例患者时,只有 13 例(41.9%)既成功再植入,又无需再次手术治疗感染。2 期组的 31 例患者中,有 9 例(29.0%)从未进行过第 2 期手术,有 4 例(12.9%)需要在第 2 期进行融合。相比之下,I&D 组的 56 例患者中有 35 例(62.5%)成功接受了治疗,无需再次手术治疗感染。在最近一次随访时(平均 3.2 年;范围 2 至 13 年),I&D 组有更多的患者能够行走(I&D 组为 76.8%,2 期组为 54.8%;p=0.05),且保持膝关节功能良好(I&D 组为 85.7%,2 期组为 45.2%;p<0.001)。

结论

在广泛使用器械的 rTKA 假体周围感染的治疗中,I&D 联合慢性抗生素抑制与 2 期置换术在预防感染再次手术方面同样有效,且在保持功能方面更有效。这些数据适用于广泛使用关节周围器械的 rTKA,不应推广至初次或简单的翻修植入物。

证据水平:治疗性 III 级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。

相似文献

1
Irrigation and Debridement with Chronic Antibiotic Suppression Is as Effective as 2-Stage Exchange in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Extensive Instrumentation.慢性抗生素抑制冲洗和清创与 2 期翻修置换在广泛器械使用的翻修全膝关节置换术中同样有效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 6;103(1):53-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00240.
2
Irrigation, Débridement, and Implant Retention for Recurrence of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.一期翻修治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染翻修术后复发的冲洗、清创和假体保留:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1772-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
3
Prognostic Factors for Success After Irrigation and Debridement With Modular Component Exchange for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.感染性全膝关节置换术后冲洗清创联合模块化组件置换的预后因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2240-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.翻修全膝关节置换术中干骺端锥体和套筒的生存率
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6S):S263-S269. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.074. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
5
The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: fate of two-stage reimplantation after failed irrigation and débridement for periprosthetic knee infection.奇特朗詹·拉纳瓦特奖:关节置换术后感染清创灌洗失败二期翻修的结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):18-25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1434-1.
6
Infection After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A High Risk of Subsequent Complications.单髁膝关节置换术后感染:后续并发症风险高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jan;477(1):70-77. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000372.
7
Outcomes of Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Ankle Arthroplasty Treated With Irrigation, Debridement, and Polyethylene Exchange.关节置换术后急性血源性假体周围感染的治疗:冲洗清创和聚乙烯置换的结果
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Nov;39(11):1266-1271. doi: 10.1177/1071100718786164. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
8
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants as Functional Prosthetic Spacers for Definitive Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Multicenter Study.初次全膝关节置换假体作为治疗人工关节周围感染的功能性假体间隔物:一项多中心研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):3040-3047. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
9
Two-stage knee arthrodesis with a modular intramedullary nail due to septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty with extensor mechanism deficiency.因翻修全膝关节置换术感染失败并伴有伸肌机制缺陷而采用模块化髓内钉进行两阶段膝关节融合术。
Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):1240-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
10
The Influence of a Failed Irrigation and Debridement on the Outcomes of a Subsequent 2-Stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty.一次失败的灌洗清创术对后续两阶段翻修膝关节置换术结果的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2508-2512. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.026. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
[Revision analysis and successful solutions for my failed primary total knee arthroplasties].[我失败的初次全膝关节置换术的翻修分析及成功解决方案]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04714-8.
2
Outcomes following planned two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections in the United States: a systematic review of the literature.美国人工关节周围感染计划性两阶段翻修关节成形术的疗效:文献系统评价
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jun 23;145(1):352. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05955-0.
3
Efficacy of Adjunctive Antiseptic Lavage Solution in Managing Acute Hip/Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Comparative Study in a Tertiary Revision Center.
辅助性抗菌灌洗溶液在治疗急性髋/膝关节假体周围感染中的疗效:在三级翻修中心的一项对比研究
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jan 21;31:101593. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101593. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
The Efficacy of Antibiotic-Loaded Calcium Sulfate Beads (Stimulan) in Patients with Hip Arthroplasty Infections.载抗生素硫酸钙珠(Stimulan)在髋关节置换术感染患者中的疗效。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 9;13(14):4004. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144004.
5
Utility of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.清创术、抗生素和植入物保留在翻修全膝关节置换术治疗急性假体周围关节感染中的应用。
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):79-84.
6
Risk factors for early septic failure after two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.二期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染的全膝关节置换术后早期败血症失败的危险因素。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Feb 12;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00750-w.
7
A simplified approach for the surgical treatment of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections.一种用于髋膝关节假体周围感染手术治疗的简化方法。
J Orthop. 2023 Nov 11;47:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.005. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
The Economics of Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.人工关节周围感染翻修关节成形术的经济学分析
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Sep 16;23:101213. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101213. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Irrigation and Debridement With Chronic Antibiotic Suppression for the Management of Acutely Infected Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasties.慢性抗生素抑制冲洗清创术治疗急性感染性无菌性翻修全关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Dec;38(12):2710-2715.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.092. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
10
Principles of mechanical and chemical debridement with implant retention.保留植入物的机械清创和化学清创原则。
Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr 6;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00170-x.