• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染的全膝关节置换术后早期败血症失败的危险因素。

Risk factors for early septic failure after two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Feb 12;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00750-w.

DOI:10.1186/s10195-024-00750-w
PMID:38347255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10861422/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The cause of early septic failure after two-stage exchange revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and the factors affecting it are not well known. The purpose of this study was to determine the surgical outcomes and the risk factors for early septic failure after two-stage revision TKA for chronic PJI.

METHODS

We identified a total of 246 adult patients who met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) diagnostic criteria for chronic PJI at two academic tertiary hospitals from March 2012 to December 2018. Finally, 151 patients who consecutively received two-stage exchange revision TKA for chronic PJI and who had a minimum 3-year follow-up were enrolled and retrospectively reviewed. Successful surgical treatment was evaluated for two-stage revision TKA and risk factors for early septic failure were identified.

RESULTS

Early septic failures occurred within 3 years after reimplantation in 48 patients (31.8%). After accounting for potentially confounding variables, we found that male patient [odds ratio (OR): 2.753, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.099-6.893, p = 0.031], fungus or mycobacterial infection (OR: 5.224, 95% CI 1.481-18.433, p = 0.01), and positive culture at reimplantation (OR: 4.407, 95% CI 1.255-15.480, p = 0.021) were independently associated with early septic failure after two-stage exchange revision TKA.

CONCLUSION

Male patients, fungus or mycobacterial infection, and positive culture at reimplantation were independently associated with an increased risk of early septic failure after two-stage exchange revision TKA despite normal C-reactive protein values prior to reimplantation. Further prospective and high-quality studies are needed to determine the risk factors of two-stage exchange revision TKA for chronic PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level IV; retrospective comparison; treatment study.

摘要

背景

对于慢性假体周围关节感染(PJI)的两阶段翻修全膝关节置换术(TKA)后早期败血症失败的原因及其影响因素尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定两阶段翻修 TKA 治疗慢性 PJI 后早期败血症失败的手术结果和危险因素。

方法

我们在两家学术性三级医院中确定了总共 246 名符合肌骨骼感染协会(MSIS)慢性 PJI 诊断标准的成年患者。最终,我们纳入并回顾性分析了 151 名连续接受两阶段翻修 TKA 治疗慢性 PJI 且随访时间至少 3 年的患者。对两阶段翻修 TKA 的手术治疗效果进行评估,并确定早期败血症失败的危险因素。

结果

在再植入后 3 年内,48 名患者(31.8%)发生早期败血症失败。在考虑了潜在的混杂变量后,我们发现男性患者[比值比(OR):2.753,95%置信区间(CI)1.099-6.893,p=0.031],真菌感染或分枝杆菌感染(OR:5.224,95%CI 1.481-18.433,p=0.01)和再植入时的阳性培养(OR:4.407,95%CI 1.255-15.480,p=0.021)与两阶段翻修 TKA 后早期败血症失败独立相关。

结论

尽管在再植入前 C 反应蛋白值正常,但男性患者、真菌感染或分枝杆菌感染以及再植入时的阳性培养与两阶段翻修 TKA 后早期败血症失败的风险增加独立相关。需要进一步进行前瞻性和高质量的研究来确定慢性 PJI 的两阶段翻修 TKA 的危险因素。

证据水平

四级;回顾性比较;治疗研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e0d/10861422/7e84c1d252a7/10195_2024_750_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e0d/10861422/7e84c1d252a7/10195_2024_750_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e0d/10861422/7e84c1d252a7/10195_2024_750_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for early septic failure after two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.二期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染的全膝关节置换术后早期败血症失败的危险因素。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Feb 12;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00750-w.
2
High revision rates following repeat septic revision after failed one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后一期翻修失败的假体周围关节感染行重复清创翻修后高返修率。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Mar;104-B(3):386-393. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B3.BJJ-2021-0481.R2.
3
Synovial Cytokines and the MSIS Criteria Are Not Useful for Determining Infection Resolution After Periprosthetic Joint Infection Explantation.滑膜细胞因子和MSIS标准对确定人工关节感染翻修术后感染是否消退并无帮助。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1630-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4710-x.
4
Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?在两阶段翻修关节成形术再次植入时,冰冻切片和微卫星不稳定性(MSIS)标准是否可靠?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1619-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4673-3.
5
Infection After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A High Risk of Subsequent Complications.单髁膝关节置换术后感染:后续并发症风险高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jan;477(1):70-77. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000372.
6
Two-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in 245 Knees without Prior Treatment for Infection.245 例初次全膝关节置换术后无感染前期治疗的假体周围关节感染的两阶段置换协议。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):239-249. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00356.
7
Revision TKA with a distal femoral replacement is at high risk of reinfection after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic knee joint infection.对于膝关节假体周围感染的二期翻修,采用股骨远端置换的翻修 TKA 具有很高的再感染风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):899-906. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06474-2. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Comparison of two-stage revision arthroplasty and intramedullary arthrodesis in patients with failed infected knee arthroplasty.感染性膝关节置换失败患者的两阶段翻修关节成形术与髓内关节固定术的比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Oct;138(10):1443-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3007-9. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
9
Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: predictors of failure.二期翻修术治疗感染性全膝关节置换术:失败的预测因素。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):3049-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2030-8.
10
Positive Alpha-defensin at Reimplantation of a Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty Is Not Associated with Infection at 1 Year.二期翻修关节成形术中再植入时的阳性α-防御素与 1 年内的感染无关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1615-1621. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000620.

引用本文的文献

1
No difference in failure between static, articulating, and prosthetic low-friction spacers for periprosthetic joint infection of total knee arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染中,静态、可活动和假体低摩擦间隔物在治疗失败方面无差异。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2025 Jul 30;10(4):243-253. doi: 10.5194/jbji-10-243-2025. eCollection 2025.
2
Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?膝关节假体周围感染的诊断检查:白蛋白与球蛋白比值能否作为一种筛查工具?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Jul 2;26(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00857-8.
3
Implant removal: benefits and drawbacks - Results of a survey with five hundred participants from the Italian Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SIOT) and comparison with other international trends.

本文引用的文献

1
Poor outcome after debridement and implant retention for acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection: a cohort study of 43 patients.清创和保留植入物治疗急性血源性人工关节感染的不良预后:43 例患者的队列研究。
Acta Orthop. 2023 Mar 8;94:115-120. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.10312.
2
Are Accuracy Studies for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis Inherently Flawed? And What to Do with Schrödinger's Hips? A Prospective Analysis of the Alpha Defensin Lateral-Flow Test in Chronic Painful Hip Arthroplasties.人工关节周围感染诊断的准确性研究本身是否存在缺陷?以及如何处理“薛定谔的髋关节”?慢性疼痛性髋关节置换术中α防御素侧向流动试验的前瞻性分析。
Hip Pelvis. 2022 Dec;34(4):236-244. doi: 10.5371/hp.2022.34.4.236. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
3
植入物取出:利弊——对来自意大利骨外科与创伤学协会(SIOT)的五百名参与者的调查结果及与其他国际趋势的比较
Int Orthop. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06564-7.
4
Risk factors of recurrent periprosthetic joint infection of the knee after two-stage reimplantation.两阶段再植入术后膝关节假体周围感染复发的危险因素
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2025 Jan 14;37(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s43019-025-00258-5.
5
Review of recent advances in the diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty part 2: single-stage or two-stage surgical technique?全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的诊断和治疗新进展述评 第 2 部分:单阶段还是双阶段手术技术?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 12;19(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05152-6.
6
Mouldable Collagen-Tricalciumphosphate Is a Safe Carrier for Local Antibiotics-Short-Term Results in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.可塑形胶原-磷酸三钙是局部抗生素的安全载体——髋关节翻修术的短期结果
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 30;13(6):510. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060510.
7
Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection.两阶段翻修术治疗人工关节感染的临床实践中即将出现的证据。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 May 18;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00767-1.
Which serum markers predict the success of reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection?
哪些血清标志物可预测假体周围关节感染后再植入的成功率?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Sep 16;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00664-5.
4
Impact of patient and prosthesis characteristics on common reasons for total knee replacement revision: a registry study of 36,626 revision cases from Australia, Sweden, and USA.患者和假体特征对全膝关节置换翻修常见原因的影响:来自澳大利亚、瑞典和美国的 36626 例翻修病例的注册研究。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Jul 5;93:623-633. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.3512.
5
Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.翻修全膝关节置换术后的临床结果:至少 2 年随访。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Mar;14(1):69-75. doi: 10.4055/cios20206. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
High revision rates following repeat septic revision after failed one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后一期翻修失败的假体周围关节感染行重复清创翻修后高返修率。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Mar;104-B(3):386-393. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B3.BJJ-2021-0481.R2.
7
Fungal and mycobacterial cultures should not be routinely obtained for diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected periprosthetic joint infections.对于疑似人工关节感染的患者,不应该常规进行真菌和分枝杆菌培养以进行诊断性检查。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jan;104-B(1):53-58. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B1.BJJ-2021-0876.R1.
8
Hospital Costs for Unsuccessful Two-Stage Revisions for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.翻修治疗失败的人工关节周围感染的两期翻修术的医院成本。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):205-212. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.018. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
9
Do Pre-Reimplantation Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate/C-Reactive Protein Cutoffs Guide Decision-Making in Prosthetic Joint Infection? Are We Flying Blind?术前红细胞沉降率/ C 反应蛋白截止值是否指导假体关节感染的决策?我们是否盲目飞行?
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):347-352. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.028. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
10
Aseptic and septic prosthetic joint loosening: Impact of biomaterial wear on immune cell function, inflammation, and infection.无菌性和感染性人工关节松动:生物材料磨损对免疫细胞功能、炎症和感染的影响。
Biomaterials. 2021 Nov;278:121127. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121127. Epub 2021 Sep 9.