CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
UWA Oceans Institute, Ocean Graduate School and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0239978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239978. eCollection 2020.
Coral bleaching driven by ocean warming is one of the most visible ecological impacts of climate change and perhaps the greatest threat to the persistence of reefs in the coming decades. In the absence of returning atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations to those compatible with ocean temperatures below the mass coral bleaching temperature thresholds, the most straightforward means to reduce thermal-stress induced bleaching is to cool water at the seabed. The feasibility of reducing the seabed temperature through cool-water injections is considered first by analysing the feasibility of doing so on 19 reefs with differing physical environments using a simple residence time metric in 200 m resolution hydrodynamic model configurations. We then concentrate on the reefs around Lizard Island, the most promising candidate of the 19 locations, and develop a 40 m hydrodynamic model to investigate the effect of the injection of cool water at differing volumetric rates. Injecting 27°C seawater at a rate of 5 m3 s-1 at 4 sites in early 2017 cooled 97 ha of the reef by 0.15°C or more. The power required to pump 5 m3 s-1 through a set of pipes over a distance of 3 km from a nearby channel is ∼466 kW. This power applied at 4 sites for 3 months achieves a 2 Degree Heating Weeks (DHWs) reduction on 97 ha of reef. A more precise energy costing will require further expert engineering design of the pumping equipment and energy sources. Even for the most physically favourable reefs, cool-water transported through pipes and injected at a reef site is energy expensive and cannot be scaled up to any meaningful fraction of the 3,100 reefs of the GBR. Should priority be given to reducing thermal stress on one or a few high value reefs, this paper provides a framework to identify the most promising sites.
海洋变暖导致的珊瑚白化是气候变化最明显的生态影响之一,也是未来几十年珊瑚礁持续存在的最大威胁。在大气温室气体浓度不恢复到与大规模珊瑚白化温度阈值以下的海洋温度相兼容的情况下,减少热应激诱导白化的最直接方法是在海底冷却海水。首先通过使用简单的停留时间指标在 200 米分辨率水动力模型配置中分析在具有不同物理环境的 19 个珊瑚礁上这样做的可行性来考虑通过冷海水注入降低海底温度的可行性。然后,我们将重点放在蜥蜴岛周围的珊瑚礁上,这是 19 个地点中最有希望的候选地点,并开发了一个 40 米的水动力模型,以研究以不同体积率注入冷水的效果。2017 年初,在 4 个地点以 5 m3 s-1 的速度注入 27°C 的海水,将 97 公顷的珊瑚礁冷却了 0.15°C 或更多。将 5 m3 s-1 的海水通过一组管道从附近的通道输送 3 公里的距离所需的功率约为 466 kW。在 4 个地点应用 3 个月的功率可使 97 公顷的珊瑚礁减少 2 度加热周(DHWs)。更精确的能源成本需要进一步对泵送设备和能源进行专家工程设计。即使对于最适合的珊瑚礁,通过管道输送并在珊瑚礁地点注入的冷水也是能源密集型的,并且不能扩展到大堡礁 3100 个珊瑚礁中的任何有意义的部分。如果优先考虑减轻一个或几个高价值珊瑚礁的热应激,本文提供了一个确定最有希望的地点的框架。