• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周血管介入器械注册评估——股浅动脉和腘动脉外周血管介入的客观性能目标。

Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices objective performance goals for superficial femoral and popliteal artery peripheral vascular interventions.

机构信息

University of Vermont Medical Center, Division of Vascular Surgery, Burlington, VT.

Your Third Opinion, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1702-1714.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.09.030
PMID:33080324
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Superficial Femoral Artery-Popliteal EvidencE Development Study Group developed contemporary objective performance goals (OPGs) for peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) for superficial femoral artery (SFA)-popliteal artery disease using the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices.

METHODS

The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry from January 2010 to October 2016 was used to develop OPGs based on SFA-popliteal procedures (n = 21,377) for intermittent claudication and critical limb ischemia (CLI). OPGs included 1-year rates for target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation, and 1 and 4-year survival rates. OPGs were calculated for the SFA and popliteal arteries and stratified by four treatments: angioplasty alone (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]), self-expanding stenting, atherectomy, and any treatment type. Outcomes were illustrated by unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

Cohorts included PTA (n = 7505), stenting (n = 9217), atherectomy (n = 2510) and any treatment (n = 21,377). The mean age was 69 years, 58% were male, 79% were White, and 52% had CLI. The freedom from TLR OPGs at 1 year in the SFA were 80.3% (PTA), 83.2% (stenting), 83.9% (atherectomy), and 81.9% (any treatments). The freedom from TLR OPGs at 1 year in the popliteal were 81.3% (PTA), 81.3% (stenting), 80.2% (atherectomy), and 81.1% (any treatments). The freedom from major amputation OPGs at 1 year after SFA PVI were 93.4% (PTA), 95.7% (stenting), 95.1% (atherectomy), and 94.8% (any treatments). The freedom from major amputation OPG at 1 year after popliteal PVI were 90.5% (PTA), 93.7% (stenting), 91.8% (atherectomy), and 91.8%, (any treatments). The 4-year survival OPGs after SFA PVI were 76% (PTA), 80% (stenting), 82% (atherectomy), and 79% (any treatments), and for the popliteal artery were 72% (PTA), 77% (stenting), 82% (atherectomy), and 75% (any treatment). On a multivariable analysis, which included patient-level, leg-level, and lesion-level covariates, CLI was the single independent factor associated with increased TLR, amputation, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The Superficial Femoral Artery-Popliteal EvidencE Development OPGs define a new, contemporary benchmark for SFA-popliteal interventions using a large subset of real-world evidence to inform more efficient peripheral device clinical trial designs to support regulatory and clinical decision-making. It is appropriate to discuss proposals intended for regulatory approval with the US Food and Drug Administration to refine the OPG to match the specific trial population. The OPGs may be updated using coordinated registry networks to assess long-term real-world device performance.

摘要

背景

浅表股动脉-腘动脉证据发展研究组使用外周血管介入(PVI)注册表评估外周介入设备,为股浅动脉(SFA)-腘动脉疾病制定了当代客观绩效目标(OPG)。

方法

利用 2010 年 1 月至 2016 年 10 月的血管外科学会血管质量倡议(SVS VQI)PVI 登记处,基于 SFA-腘动脉病变间歇性跛行和严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者的 SFA-腘动脉介入程序(n=21377)制定 OPG。OPG 包括 1 年靶病变血运重建(TLR)、大截肢和 1 年和 4 年生存率的发生率。根据四种治疗方法(单纯经皮腔内血管成形术[PTA]、自膨式支架、旋切术和任何治疗类型)对 SFA 和腘动脉的 OPG 进行了计算。通过未调整的 Kaplan-Meier 分析来描绘结果。

结果

队列包括 PTA(n=7505)、支架(n=9217)、旋切术(n=2510)和任何治疗(n=21377)。平均年龄为 69 岁,58%为男性,79%为白人,52%为 CLI。SFA 中 1 年 TLR 无复发生存率 OPG 分别为 80.3%(PTA)、83.2%(支架)、83.9%(旋切术)和 81.9%(任何治疗)。1 年时 PTV 后腘动脉 TLR 无复发生存率 OPG 分别为 81.3%(PTA)、81.3%(支架)、80.2%(旋切术)和 81.1%(任何治疗)。SFA-PVI 后 1 年大截肢无复发生存率 OPG 分别为 93.4%(PTA)、95.7%(支架)、95.1%(旋切术)和 94.8%(任何治疗)。PTV 后 1 年 POP 大截肢无复发生存率 OPG 分别为 90.5%(PTA)、93.7%(支架)、91.8%(旋切术)和 91.8%(任何治疗)。SFA-PVI 后 4 年生存率 OPG 分别为 76%(PTA)、80%(支架)、82%(旋切术)和 79%(任何治疗),POP 分别为 72%(PTA)、77%(支架)、82%(旋切术)和 75%(任何治疗)。多变量分析包括患者水平、肢体水平和病变水平的协变量,CLI 是唯一与 TLR、截肢和死亡率增加相关的独立因素。

结论

浅表股动脉-腘动脉证据发展 OPG 使用了大量真实世界的数据,为股浅动脉-腘动脉介入制定了新的当代基准,以支持更有效的外周设备临床试验设计,为监管和临床决策提供信息。与美国食品和药物管理局讨论旨在获得监管批准的提议,以细化 OPG 以匹配特定的试验人群是合适的。可以使用协调的注册网络来更新 OPG,以评估长期真实世界设备性能。

相似文献

1
Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices objective performance goals for superficial femoral and popliteal artery peripheral vascular interventions.外周血管介入器械注册评估——股浅动脉和腘动脉外周血管介入的客观性能目标。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1702-1714.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
2
Three-Year Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy for the Endovascular Treatment of Infrainguinal Claudication or Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.用于血管腔内治疗股腘动脉闭塞症或慢性肢体威胁性缺血的眼眶斑块旋切术的三年疗效
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Oct;27(5):714-725. doi: 10.1177/1526602820935611. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
3
Primary Self-EXPANDing Nitinol Stenting vs Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Bailout Stenting for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Intermittent Claudication or Critical Limb Ischemia (EXPAND Study).原发性自膨式镍钛合金支架置入术与球囊血管成形术联合选择性补救性支架置入术治疗重度间歇性跛行或严重肢体缺血患者的腘下动脉疾病(EXPAND研究)
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;22(5):690-7. doi: 10.1177/1526602815598955. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
4
Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Post Hoc Analysis From the IN.PACT Global Study.药物涂层球囊治疗严重肢体缺血患者股腘动脉病变后的结局:来自IN.PACT全球研究的事后分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Jun;26(3):305-315. doi: 10.1177/1526602819839044. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
5
Endovascular treatment of lesions in the below-knee popliteal artery.膝下腘动脉病变的血管内治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2):356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
6
Three-Year Sustained Clinical Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in a Real-World Femoropopliteal Cohort.药物涂层球囊血管成形术在真实世界股腘动脉队列中的三年持续临床疗效
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Oct;27(5):693-705. doi: 10.1177/1526602820931477. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
Analysis of endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal disease with the Supera stent.使用Supera支架对股腘动脉疾病进行血管内治疗的分析
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(4):1002-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.053. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Simultaneous Superficial Femoral Artery Angioplasty/Stent Plus Popliteal Distal Bypass for Limb Salvage.同时进行股浅动脉血管成形术/支架置入术加腘动脉远端旁路移植术以挽救肢体
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;63:443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
9
Editor's Choice - Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Improves Outcome in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Endovascular Femoropopliteal Stenting for Critical Limb Ischaemia.编辑推荐——双联抗血小板治疗可改善接受股腘动脉血管内支架置入术治疗严重肢体缺血的糖尿病患者的预后。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;53(3):403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
10
Retrograde Popliteal Access to Percutaneous Peripheral Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion of Superficial Femoral Arteries.经腘动脉逆行入路用于经皮外周介入治疗股浅动脉慢性完全闭塞病变
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 Jul;51(5):240-246. doi: 10.1177/1538574417698902. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Endovascular Interventions for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: A Network Meta-analysis.治疗股浅动脉疾病的血管内介入治疗比较:一项网状荟萃分析。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Jan 21;4(1):102432. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102432. eCollection 2025 Jan.