• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于偏好性注视技术和远程眼动追踪控制的自动视力评估

Automated Visual Acuity Evaluation Based on Preferential Looking Technique and Controlled with Remote Eye Tracking.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Xlab, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):389-397. doi: 10.1159/000512395. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1159/000512395
PMID:33080607
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish an automated visual acuity test (AVAT) for infants, based on preferential looking technique and controlled with remote eye tracking. To validate the AVAT in a group of healthy children. To compare AVAT visual acuity (VA) values with corresponding VA values acquired with standard tests (ST).

METHODS

ST, adapted for age (Keeler Acuity Cards in preverbal children and LEA symbols in verbal children), was performed to obtain monocular VA in a group of 36 healthy children. During AVAT, 9 different stimuli with grating circles that matched spatial frequencies of 9 Keeler Acuity Cards (ranging between 0.29 and 14.5 cycles per degree) were projected on a screen. Three repetitions of each stimulus were shown during 9-s intervals, interchanging with an attention grabber. The remote eye tracker was used to evaluate the proportion of time a child spent looking at each grating circle compared to a homogeneous gray background that matched the grating stimuli in average luminance. From this proportion of time, child's binocular VA was evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven percent (35/36) of healthy children successfully completed ST and AVAT. There was an agreement between the results of an ST and AVAT, with Lin's concordance coefficient being 0.53 (95% CI = 0.31-0.72). A tendency was observed toward VA overestimation on AVAT for children with VA >0.4 logMAR on ST and toward VA underestimation on AVAT for children with VA ≤0.4 logMAR on ST.

CONCLUSIONS

AVAT requires a minimally skilled investigator. The evaluation of better eye monocular VA on ST and binocular VA on AVAT was comparable for healthy children.

摘要

目的

建立一种基于偏好性注视技术并通过远程眼动追踪控制的婴儿自动视力测试(AVAT)。在一组健康儿童中验证该 AVAT。将 AVAT 视力(VA)值与标准测试(ST)获得的相应 VA 值进行比较。

方法

ST 经过适应年龄(口语儿童使用 Keeler 视力卡,非口语儿童使用 LEA 符号),用于获得一组 36 名健康儿童的单眼 VA。在 AVAT 期间,在屏幕上投影了 9 个带有光栅圆的不同刺激物,这些刺激物的空间频率与 9 张 Keeler 视力卡相匹配(范围从每度 0.29 到 14.5 个周期)。每个刺激物重复 3 次,每次 9 秒,间隔穿插注意力捕捉器。使用远程眼动追踪器来评估孩子注视每个光栅圆的时间比例,与平均亮度匹配光栅刺激的均匀灰色背景相比。根据这个时间比例,评估孩子的双眼 VA。

结果

97%(35/36)的健康儿童成功完成了 ST 和 AVAT。ST 和 AVAT 的结果具有一致性,Lin 一致性系数为 0.53(95%置信区间为 0.31-0.72)。对于 ST 上 VA>0.4 logMAR 的儿童,AVAT 存在 VA 高估的趋势,而对于 ST 上 VA≤0.4 logMAR 的儿童,AVAT 存在 VA 低估的趋势。

结论

AVAT 需要最少技能的调查员。对于健康儿童,ST 上最佳眼单眼 VA 和 AVAT 上双眼 VA 的评估是可比的。

相似文献

1
Automated Visual Acuity Evaluation Based on Preferential Looking Technique and Controlled with Remote Eye Tracking.基于偏好性注视技术和远程眼动追踪控制的自动视力评估
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):389-397. doi: 10.1159/000512395. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Age norms for grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in children using eye tracking technology.使用眼动追踪技术的儿童光栅视力和对比敏感度的年龄规范。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;42(3):747-756. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02040-4. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
3
Measuring Infant Visual Acuity with Gaze Tracker Monitored Visual Fixation.使用注视追踪器监测视觉注视来测量婴儿视力。
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jul;92(7):823-33. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000613.
4
An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System.一种使用眼动追踪系统评估婴幼儿视力的自动化方法。
J Vis Exp. 2023 Mar 17(193). doi: 10.3791/65274.
5
Automated measurement of resolution acuity in infants using remote eye-tracking.使用远程眼动追踪技术自动测量婴儿的分辨视力。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Oct 28;55(12):8102-10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15108.
6
Comparison of lea gratings with cardiff acuity cards for vision testing of preverbal children.比较 lea 光栅和 cardiff 视力卡用于测试婴儿的视力。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):541-3. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.103791.
7
Validity and reliability of eye tracking for visual acuity assessment in children with cortical visual impairment.用于评估皮质视觉障碍儿童视力的眼动追踪技术的有效性和可靠性。
J AAPOS. 2021 Dec;25(6):334.e1-334.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols.《弗赖堡幼儿敏锐度测试:测试性、重测变异性,以及与 LEA 符号的比较》
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 1;13(3):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.14.
9
Too Many Shades of Grey: Photometrically and Spectrally Mismatched Targets and Backgrounds in Printed Acuity Tests for Infants and Young Children.太多的灰色地带:婴儿和幼儿印刷视力测试中光度和光谱不匹配的目标和背景。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Nov 6;9(12):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.12.12. eCollection 2020 Nov.
10
Validation of the Waterloo Differential Visual Acuity Test (WatDAT) and Comparison With Existing Pediatric Tests of Visual Acuity.滑铁卢小儿远视力测试(WatDAT)的验证及其与现有儿童视力测试的比较。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Sep 1;12(9):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.9.13.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of Automated Visual Acuity Measurement Using a Calibration-Free Eye-Tracking System.使用免校准眼动追踪系统开发自动视力测量方法。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 12;16(7):e64401. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64401. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
A review of experimental task design in psychophysical eye tracking research.心理物理学眼动追踪研究中的实验任务设计综述。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Aug 17;17:1112769. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1112769. eCollection 2023.
3
Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Preterm and Full-Term Children Using a Novel Digital Test.
使用新型数字测试评估早产儿和足月儿的视力和对比敏感度
Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 31;10(1):87. doi: 10.3390/children10010087.
4
EyeT4Empathy: Dataset of foraging for visual information, gaze typing and empathy assessment.眼动追踪情感数据集:用于视觉信息搜索、注视类型和同理心评估。
Sci Data. 2022 Dec 3;9(1):752. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01862-w.
5
The Integration of Eye Tracking Responses for the Measurement of Contrast Sensitivity: A Proof of Concept Study.用于测量对比度敏感度的眼动追踪反应整合:概念验证研究
Front Neurosci. 2021 Aug 12;15:710578. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.710578. eCollection 2021.