• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国疾病控制与预防中心的寨卡IgM抗体捕获酶联免疫吸附测定法(CDC寨卡MAC-ELISA)诊断寨卡病毒感染的准确性。

Accuracy of the Zika IgM Antibody Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Zika MAC-ELISA) for Diagnosis of Zika Virus Infection.

作者信息

Machado Portilho Moyra, de Moraes Laise, Kikuti Mariana, Jacob Nascimento Leile Camila, Galvão Reis Mitermayer, Sampaio Boaventura Viviane, Khouri Ricardo, Sousa Ribeiro Guilherme

机构信息

Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, BA 40296-710, Brazil.

Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA 40110-100, Brazil.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Oct 18;10(10):835. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10100835.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics10100835
PMID:33080935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7603149/
Abstract

Serological diagnosis of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is challenging because of antigenic cross-reactivity with dengue virus (DENV). This study evaluated the accuracy of the Zika IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CDC Zika IgM MAC-ELISA) in differentiating between ZIKV and DENV infections. To determine sensitivity, we used acute- and convalescent-phase sera from 21 patients with RT-PCR-confirmed ZIKV infection. To determine specificity, we used acute- and convalescent-phase sera from 60 RT-PCR-confirmed dengue cases and sera from 23 blood donors. During the acute-phase of the illness, the assay presented a sensitivity of 12.5% (2/16) for samples collected 0-4 days post symptoms onset (DPSO), and of 75.0% (3/4) for samples collected 5-9 DPSO. During the convalescent-phase of the illness, the test sensitivity was 90.9% (10/11), 100% (2/2), and 0% (0/2) for samples obtained 12-102, 258-260, and 722-727 DPSO, respectively. Specificity for acute- and convalescent-phase samples from RT-PCR-confirmed dengue cases was 100% and 93.2%, respectively. Specificity for blood donor samples was 100%. The assay is an accurate method for Zika serological diagnosis and proved to be reliable for use during surveillance and outbreak investigations in settings where ZIKV and DENV cocirculate.

摘要

由于寨卡病毒(ZIKV)感染与登革热病毒(DENV)存在抗原交叉反应,因此寨卡病毒感染的血清学诊断具有挑战性。本研究评估了寨卡IgM抗体捕获酶联免疫吸附测定法(美国疾病控制与预防中心寨卡IgM MAC-ELISA)在区分寨卡病毒和登革热病毒感染方面的准确性。为了确定敏感性,我们使用了21例经逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)确诊为寨卡病毒感染患者的急性期和恢复期血清。为了确定特异性,我们使用了60例经RT-PCR确诊的登革热病例的急性期和恢复期血清以及23名献血者的血清。在疾病急性期,对于症状出现后0-4天(DPSO)采集的样本,该测定法的敏感性为12.5%(2/16),对于症状出现后5-9天采集的样本,敏感性为75.0%(3/4)。在疾病恢复期,对于症状出现后12-102天、258-260天和722-727天采集的样本,检测敏感性分别为90.9%(10/11)、100%(2/2)和0%(0/2)。RT-PCR确诊的登革热病例急性期和恢复期样本的特异性分别为100%和93.2%。献血者样本的特异性为100%。该测定法是寨卡病毒血清学诊断的准确方法,在寨卡病毒和登革热病毒共同流行的地区,已证明在监测和疫情调查中使用是可靠的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af2/7603149/a0129dbbd24f/diagnostics-10-00835-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af2/7603149/a0129dbbd24f/diagnostics-10-00835-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af2/7603149/a0129dbbd24f/diagnostics-10-00835-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of the Zika IgM Antibody Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Zika MAC-ELISA) for Diagnosis of Zika Virus Infection.美国疾病控制与预防中心的寨卡IgM抗体捕获酶联免疫吸附测定法(CDC寨卡MAC-ELISA)诊断寨卡病毒感染的准确性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Oct 18;10(10):835. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10100835.
2
Diagnostic performance of commercial IgM and IgG enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs) for diagnosis of Zika virus infection.商业 IgM 和 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)用于诊断 Zika 病毒感染的诊断性能。
Virol J. 2018 Jul 13;15(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1015-6.
3
Comprehensive Evaluation of Differential Serodiagnosis between Zika and Dengue Viral Infections. Zika 和登革热病毒感染的血清学诊断差异的综合评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Feb 27;57(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01506-18. Print 2019 Mar.
4
Comparison of Four Serological Methods and Two Reverse Transcription-PCR Assays for Diagnosis and Surveillance of Zika Virus Infection.四种血清学方法与两种逆转录聚合酶链反应检测方法用于寨卡病毒感染诊断与监测的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01785-17. Print 2018 Mar.
5
A Systematic Evaluation of IgM and IgG Antibody Assay Accuracy in Diagnosing Acute Zika Virus Infection in Brazil: Lessons Relevant to Emerging Infections.巴西急性寨卡病毒感染 IgM 和 IgG 抗体检测准确性的系统评价:新兴感染的相关经验教训。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Nov 18;59(12):e0289320. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02893-20. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Evaluation of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Assay and Two Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Detection of IgM-Class Antibodies to Zika Virus.寨卡病毒 IgM 类抗体检测的快速免疫层析法和两种酶联免疫吸附法的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Feb 27;57(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01413-18. Print 2019 Mar.
7
Serological tests reveal significant cross-reactive human antibody responses to Zika and Dengue viruses in the Mexican population.血清学检测揭示了墨西哥人群中寨卡病毒和登革热病毒存在显著的交叉反应性人类抗体应答。
Acta Trop. 2020 Jan;201:105201. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105201. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
8
Evaluation of two commercially available chikungunya virus IgM enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISA) in a setting of concomitant transmission of chikungunya, dengue and Zika viruses.评价两种市售基孔肯雅病毒 IgM 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)在基孔肯雅病毒、登革热病毒和 Zika 病毒同时传播情况下的应用。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Feb;91:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
9
Serologic Testing for Zika Virus: Comparison of Three Zika Virus IgM-Screening Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays and Initial Laboratory Experiences.寨卡病毒的血清学检测:三种寨卡病毒IgM筛查酶联免疫吸附试验的比较及初步实验室经验
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jul;55(7):2127-2136. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00580-17. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection.两种用于诊断寨卡病毒感染的血清学检测方法的评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 17;11(9):1696. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091696.

引用本文的文献

1
Persistence of Immunogenicity of a Purified Inactivated Zika Virus Vaccine Candidate in Healthy Adults: 2 Years of Follow-up Compared With Natural Infection.健康成年人中纯化灭活寨卡病毒候选疫苗的免疫原性持久性:与自然感染相比的 2 年随访。
J Infect Dis. 2023 May 29;227(11):1303-1312. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac482.
2
Zika Virus Envelope Protein Domain III Produced in Has the Potential for Diagnostic Applications.在[具体生产环境]中产生的寨卡病毒包膜蛋白结构域III具有诊断应用潜力。 (注:原文中“Produced in”后面缺少具体内容)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 11;12(5):1198. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051198.
3
ZIKA Virus Neutralizing Antibody Kinetics in Antenatally Exposed Infants.

本文引用的文献

1
Zika Virus IgM Detection and Neutralizing Antibody Profiles 12-19 Months after Illness Onset.寨卡病毒 IgM 检测和中和抗体谱 12-19 个月发病后。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;25(2):299-303. doi: 10.3201/eid2502.181286.
2
Concomitant Transmission of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika Viruses in Brazil: Clinical and Epidemiological Findings From Surveillance for Acute Febrile Illness.巴西登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒的共同传播:急性发热性疾病监测的临床和流行病学发现
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 27;69(8):1353-1359. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1083.
3
Diagnostic performance of commercial IgM and IgG enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs) for diagnosis of Zika virus infection.
ZIKA 病毒中和抗体在产前暴露婴儿中的动力学。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 17;224(6):1060-1068. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab054.
商业 IgM 和 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)用于诊断 Zika 病毒感染的诊断性能。
Virol J. 2018 Jul 13;15(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1015-6.
4
Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses.三重实时 RT-PCR 检测 Zika、登革热和基孔肯雅热病毒的性能。
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 11;9(1):1391. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03772-1.
5
Does immunity after Zika virus infection cross-protect against dengue?感染寨卡病毒后产生的免疫力能否对登革热起到交叉保护作用?
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Feb;6(2):e140-e141. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30496-5.
6
Comparison of Four Serological Methods and Two Reverse Transcription-PCR Assays for Diagnosis and Surveillance of Zika Virus Infection.四种血清学方法与两种逆转录聚合酶链反应检测方法用于寨卡病毒感染诊断与监测的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01785-17. Print 2018 Mar.
7
Development of Zika Virus Serological Testing Strategies in New York State.纽约州寨卡病毒血清学检测策略的制定。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01591-17. Print 2018 Mar.
8
Detection of Zika Virus in April 2013 Patient Samples, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.2013 年 4 月巴西里约热内卢患者样本中寨卡病毒的检测。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;23(12):2120-2121. doi: 10.3201/eid2312.171375. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
9
Evaluation of 5 Commercially Available Zika Virus Immunoassays.5种市售寨卡病毒免疫测定法的评估
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;23(9):1577-1580. doi: 10.3201/eid2309.162043. Epub 2017 Sep 17.
10
Early Evidence for Zika Virus Circulation among Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.巴西里约热内卢埃及伊蚊中寨卡病毒传播的早期证据。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Aug;23(8):1411-1412. doi: 10.3201/eid2308.162007. Epub 2017 Aug 15.