Zhang Chongyang, Zhang Fengyun, Wang Yaohui, Sun Wei, Li Hongju
Department of Emergency, the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei, China.
Graduate School of Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, Hebei, China.
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Sep;32(9):1096-1100. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200714-00520.
To analyze the status quo of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Qinhuangdao area and its influence on the prognosis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Based on the Utstein model CPR database of Qinhuangdao, data of 1 162 OHCA patients admitted to the Health Emergency Dispatch Center of Qinhuangdao City from January 2018 to January 2019 were collected, and they were divided into two groups according to whether BCPR was performed or not. The patients' demographic parameters (gender, age), precardiac arrest parameters (location of cardiac arrest), the parameters of the CPR (first aid response time before hospital, initial diagnosis of causes of cardiac arrest, initial cardiac rhythm) and the parameters of the CPR results [whether to achieve on-site restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 30-day survival rate] were collected. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed for the relationship between BCPR and on-site ROSC rate. The social characteristics of bystanders implementing BCPR, including gender, age, occupation, educational background, and acquisition method of CPR knowledge, were analyzed.
Among the 1 162 OHCA patients, the patients witnessed by professional medical personnel in nursing homes, hospitals and other places and pre-hospital emergency personnel were excluded. 852 OHCA patients were enrolled, among which only 24 patients obtained BCPR (2.8%), and the remaining 828 patients did not obtain BCPR (97.2%). There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, location of cardiac arrest, pre-hospital emergency response time, primary diagnosis of cardiac arrest causes and initial cardiac rhythm between the two groups. Compared with the non-BCPR group, the on-site ROSC rate and the 30-day survival rate of the BCPR group were significantly increased [on-site ROSC rate: 16.7% (4/24) vs. 5.2% (43/828), 30-day survival rate: 8.3% (2/24) vs. 1.3% (11/828), both P < 0.05]. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that BCPR [odds ratio (OR) = 32.132, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 11.129-65.471], location of cardiac arrest (OR = 0.080, 95%CI was 1.212-3.125) and response time during pre-hospital emergency treatment (OR = 0.121, 95%CI was 0.174-0.816) were important factors for on-site ROSC of OHCA patients (all P < 0.01). A total of 30 bystanders participated in the implementation of OHCA patients' BCPR, excluding 2 bystanders of lost follow-up, 28 bystanders with effective return visit. The 28 bystanders of BCPR practitioners were mainly male (85.7%), the age was mainly 18-40 years old (57.1%), the occupation was mainly in the tourism service industry (21.5%), students (17.9%), soldiers (14.3%) and bus drivers (10.7%), and the education background was mainly junior college or above (85.7%), the methods of acquiring CPR knowledge mainly included APP and new media (42.9%) and lectures (21.4%).
The BCPR implementation rate of OHCA in Qinhuangdao was only 2.8%. BCPR can improve the success rate of pre-hospital CPR and the 30-day survival rate of OHCA patients. Targeted selection of tourism service industry, students, military personnel and bus drivers as CPR training targets may obtain more significant social benefits.
分析秦皇岛地区院外心脏骤停(OHCA)旁观者心肺复苏(BCPR)现状及其对心肺复苏(CPR)预后的影响。
基于秦皇岛市Utstein模式CPR数据库,收集2018年1月至2019年1月秦皇岛市卫生应急调度中心收治的1162例OHCA患者资料,根据是否实施BCPR分为两组。收集患者的人口统计学参数(性别、年龄)、心脏骤停前参数(心脏骤停地点)、CPR参数(院前急救反应时间、心脏骤停病因初步诊断、初始心律)及CPR结果参数[是否实现现场自主循环恢复(ROSC)及30天生存率]。对BCPR与现场ROSC率的关系进行多因素Logistic回归分析。分析实施BCPR旁观者的社会特征,包括性别、年龄、职业、文化程度及CPR知识获取方式。
1162例OHCA患者中,排除养老院、医院等场所专业医护人员及院前急救人员目击的患者。纳入852例OHCA患者,其中仅24例获得BCPR(2.8%),其余828例未获得BCPR(97.2%)。两组患者在性别、年龄、心脏骤停地点、院前急救反应时间、心脏骤停病因初步诊断及初始心律方面差异无统计学意义。与未实施BCPR组相比,实施BCPR组的现场ROSC率及30天生存率显著提高[现场ROSC率:16.7%(4/24)比5.2%(43/828),30天生存率:8.3%(2/24)比1.3%(11/828),均P<0.05]。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,BCPR[比值比(OR)=32.132,95%置信区间(95%CI)为11.129 - 65.471]、心脏骤停地点(OR = 0.080,95%CI为1.212 - 3.125)及院前急救反应时间(OR = 0.121,95%CI为0.174 - 0.816)是OHCA患者现场ROSC的重要影响因素(均P<0.01)。共有30名旁观者参与实施OHCA患者的BCPR,排除2例失访旁观者,有效回访28例。28例实施BCPR的旁观者中男性居多(85.7%),年龄主要为18 - 40岁(57.1%),职业主要为旅游服务业(21.5%)、学生(17.9%)、军人(14.3%)和公交司机(10.7%),文化程度主要为大专及以上(85.7%),CPR知识获取方式主要包括APP及新媒体(42.9%)和讲座(21.4%)。
秦皇岛地区OHCA的BCPR实施率仅为2.8%。BCPR可提高院前CPR成功率及OHCA患者30天生存率。针对性选择旅游服务业、学生、军人及公交司机作为CPR培训对象可能获得更显著的社会效益。