Suppr超能文献

全麦与白面粉及小麦-鹰嘴豆粉混合物和面团的微观结构:对面包血糖反应的影响。

Microstructure of Whole Wheat versus White Flour and Wheat-Chickpea Flour Blends and Dough: Impact on the Glycemic Response of Pan Bread.

作者信息

Zafar Tasleem A, Aldughpassi Ahmed, Al-Mussallam Abdulwahab, Al-Othman Amani

机构信息

Department of Food Science & Nutrition, College of Life Sciences, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

出版信息

Int J Food Sci. 2020 Oct 5;2020:8834960. doi: 10.1155/2020/8834960. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Whole foods are generally considered healthier choices compared to processed foods. For nutritional consideration, whole wheat bread is recommended over the white bread. However, it has a similarly high effect on glycemic response (GR) as the white bread. This study is aimed at assessing the microstructure of whole wheat flour (WWF), white flour (WF), chickpea flour (BF), their blends, and dough and the GR of the bread made thereof. Scanning electron microscope analysis showed clear distinctions in the microstructure of the three flours. WWF particle size distribution had the widest spread with a polydispersity index (PDI) of 1.0 (±0.0) and wider average diameter, with value of 1679.5 (±156.3) compared with the particle size of 658.9 (±160.4) and PDI of 0.740 (±0.04) for WF followed by BF with the particle size of 394.1 (±54.9) and PDI of 0.388 (±0.07) ( < 0.05). The falling number was significantly ( < 0.05) lower for WWF compared to WF or BF, indicating higher alpha-amylase activity. Thus, bread made from WWF without BF substitution exhibited a higher glycemic response similar to the bread made from WF. When partly replaced with BF, the GR of the bread made with WWF or WF reduced significantly ( < 0.05) in healthy individuals.

摘要

与加工食品相比,天然食品通常被认为是更健康的选择。出于营养方面的考虑,推荐食用全麦面包而非白面包。然而,它对血糖反应(GR)的影响与白面包类似。本研究旨在评估全麦粉(WWF)、白面粉(WF)、鹰嘴豆粉(BF)及其混合物和面团的微观结构,以及用它们制作的面包的血糖反应。扫描电子显微镜分析显示三种面粉的微观结构有明显差异。WWF的粒度分布范围最广,多分散指数(PDI)为1.0(±0.0),平均直径更宽,值为1679.5(±156.3),相比之下,WF的粒度为658.9(±160.4),PDI为0.740(±0.04),其次是BF,粒度为394.1(±54.9),PDI为0.388(±0.07)(P<0.05)。与WF或BF相比,WWF的降落数值显著更低(P<0.05),表明其α-淀粉酶活性更高。因此,未用BF替代的WWF制作的面包表现出与WF制作的面包相似的更高血糖反应。当用BF部分替代时,在健康个体中,用WWF或WF制作的面包的血糖反应显著降低(P<0.05)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e9c/7557900/4eaa5f59b2fb/IJFS2020-8834960.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验